|
|
Foreign policy questionsPeggy J [no longer around] said Nov 3, 2008, 9:52 AM: |
||
|
Albert said Sep 12, 9:31 PM: |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsAlbert said Nov 6, 2008, 7:06 AM: |
||
|
See this synopsis from SPIEGEL ONLINE. After Barack Obama was elected now: |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsKeith said Nov 6, 2008, 3:41 PM: |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsMichael said Nov 23, 2008, 2:41 AM: |
||
|
Agreed indeed … BUT in the context of Barack Obama's selection of Hilary Clinton as Secretary of State elect, IT IS NOW Barack Obama's first ACTION of RESPONSIBILITY, during the transition period, to DO a great deal more to move his foriegn policy agenda forward, by collectively utilising ALL the RIGHT CONNECTIONS between Bill Clinton's and Tony Blair's “charity set”, as well as Don Beck's consultancy group, to provide Hilary Clinton & Cherie Blair with a focus to collaborate with Julia Hausermann to bring to the attention of The Peoples Republic of China, their avowed intent to come in line with the objectives of Rights and Humanities Priciples of Responsibility. |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsAlbert said Nov 23, 2008, 2:46 AM: |
||
|
Michael: 3Cheers to UK Wisdom and Genius on Gaia.) Albert |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsMichael said Nov 23, 2008, 2:53 AM: |
||
|
I THANK YOU KIND SIR, with all humility, for your support in THIS matter. |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsAlbert said Nov 23, 2008, 9:36 AM: |
||
|
As we have elections in 2009 in UK and Germany we can now focus on developing momentum for emerging new European leadership. |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsMichael said Nov 24, 2008, 12:48 AM: |
||
|
Patience IS indeed a virtue but there comes a time in the moment by moment journey of life, when the RESPONSIBLE ACTION of the people has to be considered rather than the perspective of responsible action adopted by our “glorious leaders”. |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsAlbert said Nov 24, 2008, 1:02 AM: |
||
|
And this RESPONSIBLE ACTION is multi layered. No size fits all. The more global relevance. |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsMichael said Nov 25, 2008, 2:35 PM: |
||
|
In the light of Janie's comment perhaps the children's ambassador should be Dr. Suzuki. She could then become “the fourth woman” to join with Hilary Clinton, Cherie Blair and Julia Hauserman, to be selected by Barack Obama, with George Bush's blessing if appropriate, as envoys to speak with the Peoples Republic of China about the Tibet issue. |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionscHAngeL [no longer around] said Nov 25, 2008, 5:25 PM: |
||
|
Brilliant idea Michael. I so admire her. |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsMichael said Nov 26, 2008, 1:14 AM: |
||
|
LET US ALL hope and pray that this particular IDEA will get an airing at the highest levels of the transitional Obama Camp, as well as some RESPONSIBLE ACTION in response. |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsKeith said Nov 26, 2008, 4:10 PM: |
||
|
Sorry … sorry … straying a bit here … |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsMichael said Nov 29, 2008, 2:14 AM: |
||
|
IN the context of Obama's team apparently taking on a hawkish attitude to the world, WE MUST continue to remember Obama's words … |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsAlbert said Nov 29, 2008, 2:21 AM: |
||
|
Exactly! |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsKeith said Nov 29, 2008, 12:05 PM: |
||
|
I suppose my addition above has to do more with Foreign Relations than with Policy, very indirectly of course. But felt it important to demonstrate the type of individual we have chosen as our next leader. Very important. He is not fiddling while Rome burns. This is a “roll up the sleeves and find something helpful to accomplish” soul. … “The Bush doctrine is angry, irrational, immoral, and merciless.” And it does not take a brain surgeon to see what kind of atmosphere this type of doctrine engenders … The culture of fear is not a spontaneous reaction by the public to a truly dangerous world. The worldwide anthrax panic sparked by a handful of anthrax-related deaths in America shortly after 9/11 was not caused by a genuine and widespread mortal danger facing US and European citizens. Our propensity to panic about everything from child abductions to mobile phones does not come from the fact that modern life contains more risks than ever before - on the level of everyday reality, the opposite is the case. Picture, if you will, an angry father who has just punished you … for something you haven't done! You may have “thought” about acting, but you never did. How would your family life be after this? Would you not live in constant fear that the next “thought” may send him over the edge again? Is it any wonder the US over these past eight years has been viewed with such loathing by the world? We have become the world's abusive, irrational father. Time for the pendulum to swing to the other direction. We need to have the nurturer step forward. |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsMichael said Dec 16, 2008, 1:44 AM: |
||
|
The culture of fear comes from the top down. It comes from society's leaders, and their inability to lead … ABSOLUTELY |
|||
|
|
Re: Foreign policy questionsAlbert said Apr 24, 6:30 AM: |
||
|
its silent on this thread since Obama is doing his job. |
|||

Help



