Zet White : Alive again

Re: The Hot Politics of Global Warming

Zet White said Apr 26, 2008, 3:59 AM:

 

Thea, you have a good point. I still think it is incorrect to put all/most responsibility onto the people. I'm short on time but let me throw in a few suggestions why.

People are not enlightened (yet) and are not independent thinkers. For example, would we have this conversation if the IPCC and other scientists haven't done their study of the ecosystem, or some environmentalists going out of their skin to get the mainstream media “interested” in the topic of climate change? I believe most people who are not already “into” the topic still believe this is vague, uncertain, and all about taxing people more.

Furthermore, I find your remark about the U.S. administration not being a “real entity” very important. Why don't you see it as a real entity? Do you really think the PEOPLE run your country? Or it “runs itself”? This disconnection from the government is very important. First of all, you sound as if “the next admin” in whom you may be disappointed is already there totally independent of you. Interestingly, this is exactly one of those things you can (potentially) influence directly. I see that all potential presidential candidates today are at least partly “green”, at the same time I think that your choice as an American voter is limited to “chosen” people, just like here in the UK. You can't vote, for example, yourself into the presidency. Unless you're a mason engaged into the sly political game.

One simple example. Who decides what happens to the tax money? Nobody? You maybe? And remember, you pay your earned cash to THEM, so THEY can spend it on YOUR behalf. If there is no “they” then who do you pay all that money to? Is it just such a habit already that “everyone pays taxes” just because they are taxes?

Now, did YOU decide to spend TRILLIONS of your money on a neverending unsubstantiated war halfway across the globe? Or maybe YOU decided to subsidise the oil industry to keep polluting the planet? If all that money went into efficiency improvements and renewables, this would be a different conversation.

Individual choice does make a difference, but the choice is constrained by “them”.We should by all means change those lighbulbs, but without some really substantial social activist pressure on “them”, who are not nobody but specific agencies, governors, organisation directors etc. whom we can bug till they have a constant neverending headache.

My questions would be, why don't we do it and why won't our neighbour do it, and how to get both ourselves and our neighbour to do it.

Warm regards,
Zet

P.S. If you would like it you might want to join the Actions and Reactions group here which is aimed at personal and structural action and will soon start sending our action-suggestion newsletters.