|
|
Sacred WordsTom said May 4, 2007, 6:52 PM: |
||
|
It may be stretching it a bit to call this thing sacred, but since we have the unheard-of luxury of diving deeper into spirituality and writing simultaneously (for free), I think it's appropriate. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsJosy said May 5, 2007, 6:15 AM: |
||
|
Oh! What a wonderful word!!!! Thank you for sharing it! |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSharon said May 5, 2007, 3:12 PM: |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 5, 2007, 9:01 PM: |
||
|
Don't you just love a threshold? Since we're just starting our playshop, Diving Deeper, we're at a threshold, that mysterious zone of liminality. Plus Zaadz is a threshold space. Aporia: Preface to The Gateless Gate by Mumon The Great Way has no gate,
A thousand roads enter it. When one passes through this gateless gate, He freely walks between heaven and earth. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSharon said May 7, 2007, 5:47 PM: |
||
|
Gateless because it has no gate barrier. The gate that one sees is but an image/mirage that one's belief has placed there. And, even though the gate is nonexistent, Oh, it exits for the creator who put it there. Dismiss or de+fuse the belief, and “poof!” the gate is an open Archway beckoning the weary traveler to enter and be free. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 7, 2007, 7:54 PM: |
||
|
Laws a mercy! Sharon you blow my mind. Literally. You blow the gates off my mind. It never even occurred to me that gateless could mean there is no barrier. I figured it for a paradox when it was just a plain statement of fact. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSandra said May 6, 2007, 4:36 AM: |
||
|
Oh, What can I say, dear Tom, but |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 6, 2007, 6:49 AM: |
||
|
I have another word that opens up vistas: |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsNono said May 6, 2007, 9:31 AM: |
||
|
Yammy… words for brekfast, words for dinner, words as late night snack. Keeping our digestion ongoing, nuturing our weighless enbodyment still heavy to carry from time to time - knowledge and the lack of it. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 6, 2007, 9:54 AM: |
||
|
Welcome Nothing, great to meet you! Always wanted to meet nothing, from whence everything comes, just didn't know it would be so soon. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsNono said May 6, 2007, 11:22 AM: |
||
|
Thank you Tom… no correct usage needed, I'm here because I love to write and where would I otherwise feel good and free if not in a place were those are who love to write and also do so? |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 10, 2007, 6:44 PM: |
||
|
Esprit …from from Life's 2% Solution: Simple Steps to Achieve Happiness and Balance by Marcia M. Hughes Esprit d'Core is the spirit at the core of our being. It is that unique element that makes up one's fundamental core self. It dwells in our innermost self. Our core spirit must be integrated and expressed in our daily living in order to be fulfilled and happy. When I created the concept of Esprit d'Core, I was inspired by the term esprit de corps, which is defined as “the selfless and often enthusiastic and jealous devotion of the members of a group or association of persons to the group or to its purposes.” In both phrases, the heart of the meaning is based on the word esprit, which, according to The Oxford English Dictionary, was first used by a Frenchman in 1591, and means “spirit mind” […] |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSandra said May 11, 2007, 5:19 AM: |
||
|
Oh Tom, you have released me from the chains of advertising - when I think of Esprit I think of Esprit. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 10, 2007, 6:49 PM: |
||
|
Amphisbaema: a serpent with a head at each end. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 10, 2007, 6:51 PM: |
||
|
Urinator: an archaic term for someone who dives under the sea in a diving bell. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsEnlightened.thinker said May 11, 2007, 12:35 PM: |
||
|
Glad you clarified this one. Seems like a pissed off terminator!!!LOL |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 11, 2007, 6:30 PM: |
||
|
The Urinator: Submit or Drown |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsEnlightened.thinker said May 11, 2007, 8:52 PM: |
||
|
LOL |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSandra said May 11, 2007, 12:56 PM: |
||
|
Hmm, I wonder if our pod should be renamed??! |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 11, 2007, 6:27 PM: |
||
|
Urinating Deeper just doesn't have the same zing to me, too much machinery involved. But it's a good thought, Sandra! Outside the box, that's you. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 10, 2007, 7:14 PM: |
||
|
Sigil A sign, symbol, or cypher created for a specific magical purpose. The term sigil derives from the Latin sigilum meaning “seal,” though it may also be related to the Hebrew סגולה (segulah meaning “word, action or item of spiritual effect”). The old Norse binding rune is an example of the idea. A sigil may have an abstract, pictorial or semi-abstract form. It may appear in any medium, physical, virtual, or mental. Visual symbols are the most popular form, but the use of audial and tactile symbols in magic is not unheard of. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 10, 2007, 7:29 PM: |
||
|
Quinzilbop |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsJosy said May 11, 2007, 12:16 PM: |
||
|
Thanks Tom! My head is now swimming with new words and ideas to ponder…. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsEnlightened.thinker said May 11, 2007, 12:34 PM: |
||
|
Symbiotic (as in relationship) |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 11, 2007, 6:46 PM: |
||
|
I think some artists may be symbiotic, most of them I bet. Feeding off of other artists. Dream feeding dream. And then to combine spirit, now that's mutually beneficial! |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsEnlightened.thinker said May 11, 2007, 8:50 PM: |
||
|
Hi Tom: |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 11, 2007, 7:02 PM: |
||
|
Hiden (Japanese) |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 11, 2007, 8:33 PM: |
||
|
Chiasmus |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsEnlightened.thinker said May 11, 2007, 8:51 PM: |
||
|
I like chasm too. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsNono said May 11, 2007, 11:27 PM: |
||
|
When I wrote my first book (memoirs in short prose glimpses) I called the book: |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsJosy said May 12, 2007, 9:31 AM: |
||
|
Tom~ All your great words have inspired me: ~APORIA~
(The Gateless Gate) HERE WE REACH THE DOOR MASSIVE UNPENETRABLE UNPASSABLE WE SEARCH FOR A LOCK A KEY A HANDLE ON THE MOMENT FACING THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF CROSSING THIS THRESHOLD WE BEG PLEA POSTURE CURLING FINGERS INTO FISTS WE KNOCK POUND RATTLE RAGE OUR FRUSTRATION INTO THE DOOR THE DOOR UNYIELDING UNRESPONSIVE UNANSWERING ANSWERS WE FALL PROSTRATE CONCEDING DEFEAT WE OPEN OUR EYES AND SEE THAT UPON SEEING IT DISSOLVES EFFLORESCING TRANSCENDING TRANSFORMING THE WORLD BEFORE US INTO WHAT? WE CAN ONLY PONDER… ~J.E.S. I have always wanted to try to write a poem in this style. This poem just seemed right for it. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 17, 2007, 9:35 AM: |
||
|
LOVED your poem Josy! Its form is even like a gate or a big barrier. A poem that's like a painting, visually depicting what it says. Very cool. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsAlexNoble said May 17, 2007, 10:11 AM: |
||
|
jOSY: awesome! |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 17, 2007, 9:38 AM: |
||
|
. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 17, 2007, 9:44 AM: |
||
|
Earworm |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 17, 2007, 10:28 AM: |
||
|
Mu (Japanese) A word which can be roughly translated as “none” or “without”. While typically used as a prefix to imply the absence of something (e.g., 無線 musen for “wireless”), it is more famously used as a response to certain koans and other questions in Zen Buddhism, intending to indicate that the question itself was wrong. The Mu koan is as follows: A monk asked Zen master Zhaozhou, a Chinese Zen Master: “Has a dog Buddha-nature or not?” Zhaozhou answered: ”Mu”. Some earlier Buddhist thinkers had maintained that creatures such as dogs did have the Buddha-nature; others, that they did not. Therefore, to answer “no” is to deny their wisdom, whereas to say “yes” would appear to blindly follow their teachings. Zhaozhou's answer has subsequently been interpreted to mean that all such categorical thinking is in fact a delusion. In other words, yes and no are both right and wrong . This Koan is traditionally used by students of the Rinzai School of Zen as their initiation into Zen study. In his 1974 novel Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, Robert M. Pirsig translated mu as “no thing”, saying that it meant “unask the question”. He offered the example of a computer circuit using the binary numeral system: For example, it's stated over and over again that computer circuits exhibit only two states, a voltage for “one” and a voltage for “zero”. That's silly! Any computer-electronics technician knows otherwise. Try to find a voltage representing one or zero when the power is off! The circuits are in a mu-state. According to the Jargon File, a collection of hacker jargon and culture, mu (here pronounced “moo”) is considered by Discordians to be the correct answer to the classic logical fallacy of the loaded question “Have you stopped beating your wife?” Assuming that you have no wife or you have never beaten your wife, the answer “yes” is wrong because it implies that you used to beat your wife and then stopped, but “no” is worse because it suggests that you have one and are still beating her. As a result, various Discordians proposed mu as the correct answer, alleged by them to mean “Your question cannot be answered because it depends on incorrect assumptions”. Mu is also the name of a legendary lost continent in the Pacific, analogous to Atlantis in the Atlantic. - Wikipedia |
|||
|
|
more on mudavie said Feb 29, 2008, 11:28 AM: |
||
|
i cannot not help my non-self, i just had to not not write something about something other than what i wasnt thinking. |
|||
|
|
Re: more on muNicole said Feb 29, 2008, 6:21 PM: |
||
|
delightful! i find rather enlightened on mu now, never really had a handle on it at all before. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 17, 2007, 12:17 PM: |
||
|
Ouroboros An ancient symbol depicting a serpent or dragon swallowing its own tail and forming a circle. It has been used to represent many things over the ages, but it most generally symbolizes ideas of cyclicality, primordial unity, or the vicious circle. The ouroboros has been important in religious and mythological symbolism, but has also been frequently used in alchemical illustrations. More recently, it has been interpreted by psychologists, such as Carl Jung, as having an archetypal significance to the human psyche. The name ouroboros (or, in Latinized form, uroborus) is Greek οὐροβóρος, “tail-devourer”. The depiction of the serpent is believed to have been inspired by the Milky Way, as some ancient texts refer to a serpent of light residing in the heavens. Plato described a self-eating, circular being as the first living thing in the universe - an immortal, perfectly constructed animal. The living being had no need of eyes when there was nothing remaining outside him to be seen; nor of ears when there was nothing to be heard; and there was no surrounding atmosphere to be breathed; nor would there have been any use of organs by the help of which he might receive his food or get rid of what he had already digested, since there was nothing which went from him or came into him: for there was nothing beside him. Of design he was created thus, his own waste providing his own food, and all that he did or suffered taking place in and by himself. For the Creator conceived that a being which was self-sufficient would be far more excellent than one which lacked anything; and, as he had no need to take anything or defend himself against any one, the Creator did not think it necessary to bestow upon him hands: nor had he any need of feet, nor of the whole apparatus of walking; but the movement suited to his spherical form was assigned to him, being of all the seven that which is most appropriate to mind and intelligence; and he was made to move in the same manner and on the same spot, within his own limits revolving in a circle. All the other six motions were taken away from him, and he was made not to partake of their deviations. And as this circular movement required no feet, the universe was created without legs and without feet. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSandra said May 17, 2007, 12:41 PM: |
||
|
Tom! |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 17, 2007, 7:20 PM: |
||
|
It's a dirty job, but somebody's gotta do it. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 17, 2007, 7:50 PM: |
||
|
Have you tried pretending that you don't want to write? Maybe if you can make it illicit, it will have more charm. Sneak away, escape from yourself, hide out, and do your worst. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSandra said May 18, 2007, 8:46 AM: |
||
|
I can see you now, hunched furtively over your desk, wild-eyed and jumpy, snapping your head around at the least faint door closing or tiniest mouse scrabbling in the wall, writing frantically in hopes you can scrawl a couple pages before you get caught. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 19, 2007, 9:14 AM: |
||
|
Trickster |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsHappiness said May 24, 2007, 3:55 AM: |
||
|
“Places where deep-change accidents occur…” Thanks for these excellent notes on the Trickster, who can often be a Threshold Guardian and Guide. Super notes! AJN |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 19, 2007, 9:47 AM: |
||
|
Alchemist |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 23, 2007, 10:51 PM: |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsNono said May 23, 2007, 11:10 PM: |
||
|
Author and painting Tom? Do you mean when an author paint with words? Or if it is painting with brushes and stuff, does it need to be an author or can an artist also do that “Penimento” painting? How about if one is both, as I am? |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 24, 2007, 7:35 PM: |
||
|
Hi Nono, thank God you're still here. I've been off in lala land for a few days and missed my precious resource most deeply. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSharon said May 25, 2007, 2:39 PM: |
||
|
I think the inspiration is the concept. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 25, 2007, 9:30 PM: |
||
|
Leave it to you, Sharon, to strike right to the heart of the matter. Of course that's it! |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 24, 2007, 7:41 PM: |
||
|
Emily Dickenson |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSandra said May 25, 2007, 7:55 AM: |
||
|
She did?? I wondered. I knew I'd been here before ;-) |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsNono said May 25, 2007, 8:04 AM: |
||
|
My beloved Thing… |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said May 30, 2007, 10:49 AM: |
||
|
grass widow |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said Jun 30, 2007, 3:32 PM: |
||
|
wordhord This chapter aims to help you over the first hurdles by introducing you to some useful and quickly identifiable Old English words, and suggesting some strategies with which you can begin to build up your own ‘word hoard' (Old English wordhord) of ancient expressions. With the minimum of effort, many Old English words are easy to recognise. They have not changed very much for over a thousand years. For instance, most if not all of the following words should be recognisable (their present-day equivalences are given at the end of this chapter). It often helps to say the words aloud. |
|||
|
|
ChiaroscuroJulieJordanScott said Jul 5, 2007, 2:27 AM: |
||
|
One of my favorites: |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsMichael said Jul 5, 2007, 4:14 AM: |
||
|
My brother in law is reputed to have said to his mum & dad - during the early period of his language aquisition - |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said Sep 8, 2007, 12:13 AM: |
||
|
Panopticism from The Oprah Phenomenon by Robert J. Thompson, Jennifer Harris, and Elwood Watson |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said Jan 19, 2008, 8:24 PM: |
||
|
Apophatic Negative theology - also known as the Via Negativa (Latin for “Negative Way”) and Apophatic theology - is a theology that attempts to describe God by negation, to speak of God only in terms of what may not be said about God. In brief, the attempt is to gain and express knowledge of God by describing what God is not (apophasis), rather than by describing what God is. The apophatic tradition is often, though not always, allied with the approach of mysticism, which focuses on a spontaneous or cultivated individual experience of the divine reality beyond the realm of ordinary perception, an experience often unmediated by the structures of traditional organized religion or learned thought and behavior. Apophatic description of God Neither existence nor nonexistence as we understand it applies to God, i.e., God is beyond existing or not existing. (One cannot say that God exists in the usual sense of the term; nor can we say that God is nonexistent.) |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsMichele [no longer around] said Feb 1, 2008, 7:06 AM: |
||
|
God is not Dog, or is it? |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSparrow [no longer around] said Feb 1, 2008, 4:30 PM: |
||
|
Michele, surely you've heard about the insomniac dyslexic agnostic who lays awake at night |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsMichele [no longer around] said Jan 20, 2008, 7:23 AM: |
||
|
(Liking what I'm reading…prolific!)
In recent times, and more globally, the term “namaste” has come to be especially associated with yoga and spiritual meditation all over the world. In this context, it has been viewed in terms of a multitude of very complicated and poetic meanings which tie in with the spiritual origins of the word. Some examples:
|
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsTom said Jan 20, 2008, 9:38 AM: |
||
|
Holy liminal, Batman! Thanks so much, Michele, for adding to our list. Namaste is a liminal word, for there is a threshold between two people that they cross when they meet, and namaste is a grand gate, as well as a threshold between languages. It's important to me that you chose this word because before it was something I was a little uncomfortable saying. Made me feel like a poser. Longmont boy makes the bigtime, eastwise. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsRumi Wannabe said Jan 29, 2008, 10:06 PM: |
||
|
Sparrow, |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsRumi Wannabe said Jan 29, 2008, 10:13 PM: |
||
|
With the guffaw out of the way, I'd like to (seriously) propose the word 'before' as a sacred word. It has a nice way of lifting me out of mind-talk. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsRumi Wannabe said Jan 30, 2008, 9:44 PM: |
||
|
Sparrow, |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsSparrow [no longer around] said Jan 31, 2008, 4:17 AM: |
||
|
hmmmmm, a challenge methinks….will chew on challenge today and see what I comes up with…. |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsMichele [no longer around] said Feb 1, 2008, 7:17 AM: |
||
|
oops. Sorry, Rumi. What were you saying before? |
|||
|
|
Re: Sacred WordsRumi Wannabe said Feb 1, 2008, 8:27 AM: |
||
|
Michele, |
|||

Help

