| |
I feel we're substantially in agreement, here. One of my frustrations has been the lack of true integration of all the feminist thought of the past. It seems like too often, it's simply dismissed as “green” or anti-male and the uncomfortable truths are also thrown out with the bathwater. It sounds like you are actually more in a position to talk abut the nitt-gritty of this, and I'm excited to hear more of what you have to say. I'm looking to learn more, and you seem quite capable of bring more light to this.
As to the video, it's just not that good. I don't think it necessarily reflects on these women's full body of work at all. I know that Diane's other videos have been much more useful to me. I just don'tthink this was one of those sessions that “clicked.” They could have found something better to spotlight. It seems like an afterthought, with no truly coherent message.
As to Ms. Floris, I don't think it'/s a pre-trans error, but a category error. I don't see where she's saying that the 50/50 stage is equivalent to the non-dual, just that she thinks it's necessary. Non-dual, is, of course, always-already present, and not dependent on one's evolutionary stage, hence the category error. Though of course, as has been said before, it's an accident that is made more likely to happen the further up the ladder you go.
Liz
|
