|
|
SpiritualityFreeThinks said Dec 16, 2007, 4:29 PM: |
||
|
I am not hostile, I'm not idiotic (usually), and I'm not always apathetic. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitydavid1976 said Dec 16, 2007, 8:23 PM: |
||
|
You may not believe in Spirituality, but do have any philisophical bent towards service to others? |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityJack Taylor said Dec 16, 2007, 8:41 PM: |
||
|
no, yor not the only one….. but one of a few |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualitySpundana *~The Cosmic Vibration~* said Dec 18, 2007, 7:14 PM: |
||
|
Dear Soozi, |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityFreeThinks said Dec 17, 2007, 4:57 AM: |
||
|
No, David. I'm not against helping other people out, but I've never felt any obligation to donate to charities or give anything of myself to others. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitydavid1976 said Dec 17, 2007, 8:50 PM: |
||
|
FreeThinks |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityGypster said Dec 18, 2007, 9:53 AM: |
||
|
Hi Free Thinks, |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualitySpundana *~The Cosmic Vibration~* said Dec 18, 2007, 2:27 PM: |
||
|
Hi Free Thinks,
|
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitysandy said Jan 1, 2008, 3:57 PM: |
||
|
You mentioned The Celestine Prophecy , |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitysmwilliams said Jun 5, 2008, 11:55 PM: |
||
|
Why someone believes in something I can't explain, because beliefs are based on a persons indivdual experiences through life. I can say that people are curious by nature, and since the first people where on this earth we have looked for meaning and understanding of the things around us. I believe that spirituality is the search for understanding of ourselves. Discovering who we are and finding the way to become the best person that we can become. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualitySpundana *~The Cosmic Vibration~* said Dec 18, 2007, 7:17 PM: |
||
|
Dear Ms Free thinks, |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityGypster said Dec 19, 2007, 7:34 AM: |
||
|
Thank you Jagan for your always insightful posts. :D |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityGrace said Dec 19, 2007, 1:43 PM: |
||
|
|
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualityelementstew said Dec 19, 2007, 2:14 PM: |
||
|
You do too believe in the concept of spirituality, you're talking about it. I'm not going to get into why different cultures/regions differ, nor will I ramble about the origins of religion/spirituality because it is too complex and hard to piece together due to the origins pre-dating written language by millenia. One of the reasons is likely to be the difficulty of managing the reality of mortality. You should understand that being a nonspiritual person. I suspect that the glowing/inner/chakra/fluff-stuff serves bith as a bonding mechanism and a distraction from the harsh realities of the present with it's seeds sown for a potentially horrific future. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityHazzard [no longer around] said Dec 20, 2007, 5:52 AM: |
||
|
How do you think I feel! I am a Christian but I feel like I've joined some new age cult. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitybackyarder1 said Dec 20, 2007, 12:29 PM: |
||
|
Hi Free Thinks. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityFreeThinks said Dec 20, 2007, 4:34 PM: |
||
|
Thank you all for your posts. SPECIAL thanks to you, elementstew, for correcting my inaccurate wording. *winks.* 1. Why do we Love? Is it instinct? If so, why do we love certain activities, things, people? I don't know. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityAlan said Dec 22, 2007, 5:21 AM: |
||
|
Hi Freethinks, I took a look at your profile, and you’re like 18? something like that, right? Well, at 18, I didn’t believe in none of that gump either, and I’d bet everyone here, in some point in their *longer than you might think* existance didn’t believe in it as well. I think the answer to your question is, it’s a question of evolution. Personally I’ve never liked the word spirituality, because it conjures up images of people with flowers painted on their heads doing mushrooms and trying to talk to van-gogh using ouji-boards. now, I have no problem with flowers, mushrooms, or van gogh, but inherant in the term is the history of judgement those “with two feet firmly planted” have leveled against the ‘spiritualists.’ What happened to me, simply, was that eventually I came to the point where it couldn’t be denied that the view of the universe, cause and effect, and human life that I’d been given by society was… shockingly limited, and in a sense, horribly miscorrect. I think most here would say, as people who have responded here are beautifully saying, the trick is to find all answers within yourself. don’t believe in chakras? Ok, that word is meaningless to you: erase it from your vocabulary. You got a star, follow it. If you’re inflappable, if you are dedicated beyond the end of your strength, eventually, you may decide everything you’ve been taught wasn’t what they said it was. …or not. the question is, are you wiling to dance the dance? Seek the seeker’s…thing that’s sought? But to give a few of my answers: paradox is the fundamental state of our existance, and everything you say is true, but usually, so is the opposite, and all shades in between. The trick is to resolve the paradoxes, which none can do for you. I wouldn’t look for god in my mind, but I wouldn’t look for god outside of me either. in fact, I wouldn’t look for god period, because if I look for god, chances are I won’t find god, because looking for god is an action based in logical phalacy. Paradox: even imperfect as we are, everyone is perfect, because everything is perfect. If there’s a guy with a white beard standing on a cloud somewhere, throwing lightning or spying on us, his ‘creations,’ I’d treat him like the zens say to treat the buddha if I see him. Chakras are a culturally and historically loaded term for energy convergience points in the human body, and that the human body has energy is undeniable, if you like the matrix or know anything about free electrons or MRI exams. trust no one : P |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityShameslaya said Dec 22, 2007, 4:53 PM: |
||
|
Hello Freethinx….Alan.. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityAlan said Dec 23, 2007, 4:38 PM: |
||
|
And I would endorse/add to tantricksta’s eloquence to say that, especially if you take a good look at science, with a key eye towards the areas where science’s understanding doesn’t jive with their evidence, AND you without believing or disbelieving, read up on things like chakras, very interesting answers come up. …why does the body, for example, lose 6 grams or whatever? …how many free photons are in a body? When they move, they act as if they have ‘weight’ and are detectable by scales and such… how many free photons would it take to stop moving to make these 6 grams, and is it possible to prove that this happens at death? would fleeing free photons then possibly be what god-loving types call “the soul?” heh heh heh I really wish someone would do this study, damnit : P EDIT: hmmm it just occurred to me that “free” photons couldn’t be “in a body,” could they? Still, I’d bet everyone’s vibrating their own special way in the free photon sea, the “Cosmic Microwave Background”… wish I knew more about how it worked… where are scientists when you need them? REedit: hm, something else occurred to me, as I mull this again– wouldn’t an “out of body” experience just be cutting the ties between one’s photons and matter? I could see photons being superimposed somehow, only to escape every now and then, if the brain of the person is savvy… |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityBrian said Dec 27, 2007, 1:21 AM: |
||
|
There is a movie that may shed light on this: 21 grams. This is said to be the weight of the human soul. A body that ways 180lbs sheds 21 grams of weight at the exact moment of death. This is a medical/scientific fact and don't ask me how the data was gathered but it is nearly scientific proof of “something”. In sociology I recently heard of a study of couples having fertility problems. It was a double blind study set up so that neither the couples nor the religious organizations knew anything about the study. Group 1 was prayed for and group 2 of the couples was not. The religious folk were simply asked by scientists to pray for a group of families having fertility problems with no knowledge of the study or that the men asking for prayer were actually furthuring scientific research. The group being prayed for experienced something along the lines of a 20% increased fertility rate MORE than the control or first group. The ratio was something like group 1 60% fertility group 2 40% fertility - no medicines were given and the grouping was done with tremendous attention to details such as ethnicity, age, and social inclination. The study caused waves because it seemed to prove the action of a divine hand. Draw your own conclusions but I for one have been very spiritual for a long time - even if I don't follow the traditional worshiping behavior of my southern babtist upbringing. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityNaumadd said Dec 27, 2007, 5:46 PM: |
||
|
The concept of “spirit” needn't have anything to do with the supernatural and, indeed, is best without it. If there is a “spirit” it must be and can only be rooted in what is natural and real. If it is rooted only in the imaginary or the unsubstantiated, it is a waste of your time other than as a fanciful mental exercise. Considering the heavy value people place on the idea of the “spirit”, in its discovery, its cultivation, it nurturance, its preservation, you would think they'd be extremely diligent in discovering and defining what IS genuinely “spirit” and what is NOT. In other words, if you value “spirit” highly, I'd expect you to spend every effort to find its authentic basis rather than accept whatever sounds good or whatever you can imagine is true. The concept of “spirit” is too important to be so casual in its definition and in attaching unsubstantiated qualities or truths to it. The true nature of “spirit”, once perceived, will steer you clear of the “snake oil” and smoke and mirrors of the mystics. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityFreeThinks said Dec 31, 2007, 3:59 PM: |
||
|
Thank you, Naumadd, for that post. When I saw your reference to “the mystics,” I suspected that you were a fan of Ayn Rand, as I am. Your response is very insightful and has helped me to look at the “spirit” in a different way. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spirituality1Vector3 said Jan 1, 2008, 1:14 PM: |
||
|
Hadn't checked this thread for awhile. Getting more interesting, more wisdom!!! |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityMegan said Jan 1, 2008, 2:42 PM: |
||
|
I really agree totally with all that Vector says. We all have our own rhythm or wavelength we operate on and total awarenss of all that is going on around is is overwhelming. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualitySpundana *~The Cosmic Vibration~* said Jan 1, 2008, 3:41 PM: |
||
|
I just wonder why did we name these terms as Spirit and Spiral? because both seem to indicate something which is Unending, or Infinite, eternal. Also Scientists couldn't get even a Single picture from their Space Voyages to Mars before they named their Craft “Spirit” |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityAlan said Jan 1, 2008, 5:32 PM: |
||
|
Hmm I suppose that’s one point scored for the word “spirituality,” isn’t it? At least, a point for spirit, the root word. : D This thread kicks ass. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitybackyarder1 said Jan 1, 2008, 5:49 PM: |
||
|
Just something else to think about, since it's a new year: Spirituality is a choice and I imagine that all of the people that choose it are more peaceful and blissful and centered. Being spiritual – believing there is a spirit within that guides us – is like having a constant friend there with you to help you through the rough times in life. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spirituality1Vector3 said Jan 2, 2008, 12:45 AM: |
||
|
Hey Alan, or anyone who digs this threa, you can bop on over to Collective Wisdom pod and nominate it for the Hall of Fame for zaadz Threads!!! |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualityhi! said Jan 2, 2008, 7:28 PM: |
||
|
people think or beleive in this the same way others believe in their religion. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityAlan said Jan 3, 2008, 4:27 PM: |
||
|
I’ve tried, but every time I do my internet crashes. : ( My computer’s so old, I think it must’ve been featured on an episode of the flinstones. I’ll get one up soon tho promise this thread bedrocks! ha *ducks rotten fruit* |
|||
|
|
Re: Spirituality1Vector3 said Jan 4, 2008, 1:49 AM: |
||
|
Yeah, Alan, I hear you. I am not techie enough to suggest any workarounds. What does “ducks rotten fruit” refer to????? |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityJPtigercat said Jan 4, 2008, 4:06 PM: |
||
|
Dear FreeThinks (and everybody), |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualityfounderofhope2revival said Jan 4, 2008, 11:59 PM: |
||
|
For all:
We could speak much about opinions concerning spirituality, but here is a simple exercise that proves it is real:
close your eyes: imagine the smile of someone you love, the warmth of a phone call of someone you care for, the soft petting of your cat or dog when you rest, the calm serenity of a small empty church, the clearing of the mind when walking in a garden center with the plants and flowers, the inspiration you feel after having watched some heroism of people on a show, the uplifting of emotions by listening to some instrumental movie score that makes you feel connected, the tears coming up when you see two people meeting again after many years and they cry of happiness…THAT is spirituality… AND one moment or the other, by probability of mathematics, we ALL do experience in our lifetime a few of these. Point. Like electricity, you might not see the Force and God, BUT it is there, just embrace the 4Th dimension, sometimes, it shall then broad your view of what there is really out there.
Pascal Gillon BASc Founder infogatherer.com |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitybackyarder1 said Jan 6, 2008, 6:36 AM: |
||
|
that's wonderful Pascal. Thank you. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityFreeThinks said Jan 8, 2008, 3:30 AM: |
||
|
There was a time when I would've been posting here every day, coming up with new arguments against all the people who don't believe as I do…but I'm glad that now I can honestly say that I have no desire to make you guys see my way of thinking. Obviously I don't agree with everyone, but I love the fact that so many people are sharing their beliefs with me here, if only because they help confirm the beliefs of others. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityAlan said Jan 8, 2008, 5:43 AM: |
||
|
Free Thinks, How you’ve made all of us smile with this lovely message! I’ll send you hope that you find your joy… |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualityauntie k said Mar 6, 2008, 3:41 PM: |
||
|
Hi, FreeThinks, |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualitySelf_Honesty said Jan 11, 2008, 5:27 PM: |
||
|
Hi FreeThinks, I recently came to this site to explore this very issue. Experience has taught me that concepts can be part of the problem rather than the solutions. (Ken Wilber talks about maps and territory.) I believe we expect to much out of our minds/intellectual capacity. Have you ever thought that spirituality may simply be your state of being, i.e., moods, thoughts,etc. Forget about the label. Practice listening to your body. Buddha warned us not to believe something just because someone said it. Overtime you will discover truths about your very being that you will readily acept because they will be grounded in your life experience. . |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityFreeThinks said Jan 11, 2008, 6:49 PM: |
||
|
I don't understand what you mean when you say that we expect too much of our minds. Can you explain that further, please? |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityAlan said Jan 11, 2008, 10:57 PM: |
||
|
freethinks, hi! First, the nature vs. nurture debate– whether or not your emotions and capabilities are hereditary– has been going on for as long as science has had the word “hereditary.” The simple answer to your question is that genetics are not the cause of the emotions and moods we feel– we are. But some might say one’s past ‘experiences’ could be responsible for one’s future ‘genetics.’ : ) Have you ever checked out those books that gather information scientifically about people who believe they remember past life experiences? That stuff’s pretty fascinating. once there was a five year old who knew as much about ancient egypt as any egyptologist, literally. They had to check everything he (or she) said against all the research. Now, if you think about it that way, something they might label as “hereditary” could have nothing do do with who one’s parents are. And I like where you’re going with the word/label thing! There’s nothing mystical in the universe. There’s only the universe. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualityjoy said Apr 30, 2008, 12:15 PM: |
||
|
Free Thinks |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityDarlene said Jan 20, 2008, 4:36 PM: |
||
|
I think it would depend on how you define spirituality. Not everyone who says their spiritual means auras or chi and such. I am spiritual, though don't really have much of an opinion on the examples you gave. I am more of a basic dualist (ie I think that the body and the soul are different but interconnected.) I don't think anyone can tell you why people believe in an external essence apart from their body (be careful with mind as many find that to be the seperate part). The question goes back to ancient times, wher the greatest of the philosophers even ponder such questions. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityWisdom Channeler said Jan 23, 2008, 11:19 AM: |
||
|
When one is able to SEE, then one is able to SEE. I can see and feel what many can not. I believe in spirituality–chi, essence, auras, energy–because I can see it. I cannot deny my sight or my sensation any more than I can prove that what I see–feel–actually exists. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityTara said Jan 23, 2008, 12:52 PM: |
||
|
Freethinks, hang in there your answers will come with new stops along your journey. I have been on a spiritual 'quest' for years asking the same questions I saw earlier in the thread. I read, and really focused on making every day an adventure. Over time, I met others who were the answer. It was nothing they said, it was what they did. I became a sponge, soaking up every ounce of wisdom I could. Through experience, I am right now still the student. I don't live by a structured belief system, yet rather a simple plan of actions. Humans learn best by doing. Go out and meet people- go on an adventure, your answers will come. An open mind will set you free. Cherish each moment by following your bliss. Remember that the concept of tomorrow is an idea, not a promise. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityShanita said Feb 6, 2008, 5:17 PM: |
||
|
Wow! The only thing I want to say is that it is discussions like these that make fall in love with this website over and over again. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityStaci said Feb 7, 2008, 11:26 AM: |
||
|
If you find yourself overanalysing things around you then it may be impossible to look inward at yourself as an amazing creature with theoretically infinite possibilities. Only you must choose from the myriad of scenarios that will become your life. Spirituality to me, is a concept of being part of or the essense of whatever life-giving force created us. To be in touch with spirituality then, is just believing you didnt just fall into this dimension from a time/space portal. Just my oponion,,, |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualityjohanna said Feb 8, 2008, 11:45 AM: |
||
|
UNIFICATION OF PERSPECTIVES ABOUT HOW TO BETTER LOVE EACH OTHER |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitysandy said Mar 8, 2008, 2:58 AM: |
||
|
What you speak of Stands near the Fire is |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitypirate3 said Feb 24, 2008, 8:08 PM: |
||
|
I am trying to understand spirituality myself. I have always tried to base my actions on what I believed to be the greater good of mankind -Meaning that I try to help all those I am able too, regardless of outcome or “who's watching”. I honestly do it because I just know its right, not because I feel “balanced” or in tune, or whatever. I was raised as a catholic, but find it difficult to prescribe to a certain belief. To the original poster: you are not alone in thought. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualityjill said Mar 1, 2008, 4:09 PM: |
||
|
I feel the same way. I send my kids to church (not even a Catholic one and I am actually Catholic) so that they learn the values because I do believe in being kind to others and treating others as you would want to be treated, but the whole God thing escapes me. I guess I'm just too scientific of a thinker. I need proof. I believe in evolution and scientific theory. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityBassicallyTom said Mar 2, 2008, 6:53 AM: |
||
|
Spirituality is like a pair of shoes. What fits you may not fit me, what works for you may not work for me. Flip-flops are worthless for hiking in the mountains, just as boots don't work on the beach. And just as purchasing a pair of shoes is a painful, time consuming effort (for me), so is finding the spirituality that best fits you. You may have to go through several pairs before you find the ONE. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualityjill said Mar 3, 2008, 1:31 PM: |
||
|
That was an excellent analogy. Being a shoe lover it made a lot of sense to me. You are absolutely right. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityBassicallyTom said Mar 5, 2008, 7:17 PM: |
||
|
Thanks, Jill. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitykerrimarie113 said Mar 7, 2008, 9:33 AM: |
||
|
My spiritual journey is the quest to end my suffering. What has worked best for me is learning to be conscious at all times, in the sense of always being in the moment and accepting or enjoying what im doing, and simply just enjoying being. Not identifying with form/ego and knowing that all physical form is temporary, but the spirit, is eternal. a couple of quotes that pretty much demonstrate what I mean, from Eckhart Tolle's new book “A New Earth” “The change goes deeper than the content of your mind, deeper than thoughts. In fact, at the heart of the new concsiousness lies the transcendence of thought, the newfound ability of rising above thought, of realizing a dimension within yourself that is infinitely more vast than thought. You then no longer derive your identity, your sense of who you are, from the incessant stream of thinking that in the old consciousness you take to be yourself. What a liberation to realize that the “voice in my head” is not who i am. Who am i then? The one who sees that. The awareness that is prior to thought, the space in which the thought- or the emotion or sense perception- happens.” “When there is nothing to identify with anymore, who are you? When forms around you die or death approaches, your sense of Beingness, of I Am, is freed from entanglement with form: Spirit is released from its imprisonment in matter. You realize your essential identity as formless, as an all-pervasive Presence, of Being prior to all forms, all identifications. You realize your true identity as consciousness itself, rather than what consciousness has identified with. That's the peace of God. The ultimate truth of who you are is not I am this or I am that, but I Am.” with love kerri |
|||
|
|
Re: Spirituality1Vector3 said Mar 8, 2008, 4:55 PM: |
||
|
Hi kerri, let me know you got this, because it is a reply to post, and will be easily discoverable only if you are on Notifications for this Group. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spirituality/Bob said Mar 8, 2008, 2:52 AM: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityBassicallyTom said Mar 19, 2008, 6:50 PM: |
||
|
What does spirituality do for you? I think we have seen that some posters don't have any need for spirituality, some use spirituality as a hedge bet, and some consider spirituality as the centre of their existence. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityKali-Sulis said Apr 19, 2008, 8:31 PM: |
||
|
spirituality isn't about god or you chi or whatever. its about the faith that there is a purpose and a reason for things. its about being true to yourself and your beliefs. what you are describing is religion which focus on belief in certain ideas and things or beings, spirituality has more to do with the individual and its needs on an individual scale. i think that allot of people get spirituality and religion mixed up because religion can not exist without spirituality. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityAjar said Apr 21, 2008, 2:53 AM: |
||
|
Wow. |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityRachel said Apr 29, 2008, 3:13 AM: |
||
|
for me, spirituality is following God's call for me in my life. it does not require yoga, a special diet, a “good deeds” chart or a list of movies i'm not allowed to see. it is living a full, passionate life for God. it's not about “religion”. religion tends to be a slough of rituals and lists and requirements. that's not what God is all about. He believes in LOVE and wants you to do the same. my faith, or “spirituality” as you call it, consists of two things. JESUS and LOVE. THAT is spirituality to me.
|
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityBruce said Apr 30, 2008, 6:50 PM: |
||
|
Spirituality, as I understand it is not a belef or a belief system - it is experiential. It's not about beliefs.
Spirituality is about living and living consciously, but beyond the rational and analytic processes of the mind…It doesn't mean that 'spirit' is separate or apart from the mind, it only means that there is a much deeper part of our being than the active, moving and restless “stream of though”, the inner dialogue we can all be aware of, the restless thnking which is not 'us' per se. I scoffed when exposed to this news when I was 28….after all, I was very intelligent, knew a little about a lot of things, knew a lot about a very few things, and had my own beliefs based on the rationality of science….but reason can only take one so far. Carl Jung, a medical doctor and perhaps the greatest Western psychiatrist yet, wrote about there being a deep, spiritual thirst for 'wholeness' in every human. He hesitated because he found himself to be greatly misunderstood at the time of writing in 1961, shortly before his death - a much less informed, and liberated time - let alone the forty or fifty years prior to that in which he principally worked. Jung hesitated to aver that understood “in medieval terms” - monks, chivalrous knights, barons, fiefs and The Church etc. - what fuelled humankind's various addictions (to booze, drugs, conspicuous consumption, sex etc.) was a spiritual thirst for “union with God”. (Remember, folks, Jung was saying this in “medieval terms”). He noted that this was the highest “religious” or “mystic” experience one could experience. It was the kind of experience, the state of consciousness and being, that up to then had been described only by people like Bhudda, a Christ, Shakespeare, a St. Francis, Walt Whitman etc. - an “enlightened” state of consciousness and being - medieval Christians called it, and still do, “mystic union”. Jung noted that to have such an experience one must be on what he called a “path”, a discipline - and a path to “higher consciousness”, and a path, “in reality”. Not 'shrooms, not booze, not pot, threesomes or Jimmy Chu shoes (did I spell that right?). This is a path through the mind to the deeper mind or soul - or the “psyche” - as it was referred to in ancient Greece. Some refer to it as the “Overself”. One could find oneself thrust onto such a path in three ways, Jung wrote. First, by an act of “grace” (a return to the unmerited, childlike state of being and awareness, that eventually succumbs to conditioned analytic reasoning. It is a word well worth investigating in the dictionary and online.) Second, tone can find oneself on a path hrough a personal and honest contact with friends - and, by that, I take it Jung meant not superficial contact, not a swapping of ideas and stories that we tell and share about our selves, but innermost heart-to-heart, psyche-to-psyche, soul-to-soul contact about the matters that are most dear, most important, and most real to us. Third, Jung said that one can come to such a mystic/spiritual/highest-religious experience by “a higher education of the mind, beyond the merely rational.” So, you see, spirituality is a state of consciousness of the mind, but not the way we are conditioned to think about it in purely Western, rational and empirical scientific terms. It can be experienced, as Patanjali pointed out 2,500 years ago, by re-conditioning or “stilling” the thought-waves of the mind. But, spirituality is definitely not a matter of belief, understanding, reason or even knowledge. Well, perhaps knowledge, but only experiential knowledge. A spiritually-centered state of consciousnes and being is a matter of experiencing and contemplating life, our being and our world existence, without analysis and reasoning - beyond the classification, naming and ordering of things, but rather 'wholistically' and without the restless mentation of the undisciplined and conditioned-to-restlessness, modern mind. “Thinking without awareness,” writes Eckhart Tolle, a thoroughly modern yet enlightened being, “is the chief dilemna of human existence.” And so it has been for immemorial time. That, say those who knew and realized a lot more than I ever will, is the wisdom of all ages and continents, that is humankind's perennial philosophy. Try it for yourself, with open-minded investigation. “Contempt prior to investigation”, wrote Herbert Spencer, as great a scientist and philosopher as most, is a sure “bar” knowledge and learning; and, I would add, to all scientific progress and understanding itself. Peace, Peace - Peace of Mind, and blessings, Bruce |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityTracy said May 2, 2008, 9:46 AM: |
||
|
Bruce, |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityAngel said May 2, 2008, 10:37 AM: |
||
|
Asking people why they believe in spirituality is like people asking you why you do not believe in spirituality. Why ask why? |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityBruce said May 2, 2008, 8:31 PM: |
||
|
I've been sudying my ass off on the question of what is spirituality, what is consciousness and what is reality for the last few years now - diligently studying it ….and I really know, feel with the depth of all my reasoning, rational understanding and analytical abilit,y and, what's more, with the depth of my intuitive non-cognitive part of my mind and being….that all paths and branches of knowledge lead to the same conclusion: It's all consciousness … reality, spirituality, the psyche … all the pure and undivided, non-dual, utterly entangled interbeing of one, unitive Meta-Consciousness…. Physics, metaphysics, theology and and psychology all, I believe, point to this same ageless truth. “According to quantum mechanics there is no such thing as objectivity. We cannot eliminate ourselves from the picture. We are a part of nature, and when we study nature there is no way around the fact that nature is studying itself. Physics has become a branch of psychology, or perhaps the other way round.Then Zhukav puts these two threads together to form his startling and liberating conclusion that is upheld as one peruses his history of modern physics from its Newtonian, pre-relativistic roots, through Einsteinian relativistic theory and quantum theory, ending with brilliant conclusions on Bell's theorem and the work of David Bohm - a physicist who likely missed out on the big “prizes” of phsysics, due to both McCarthyism and his metaphysical forays with the enlightened spiritual teacher Jiddu Krishnamurti. Zhukav concludes, conjoining the insights of Jung and Pauli: “If these men are correct, then physics is the study of the structure of consciousness” (emphasis added).Thoughts anyone? |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityBruce said May 2, 2008, 8:32 PM: |
||
|
I've been sudying my ass off on the question of what is spirituality, what is consciousness and what is reality for the last few years now - diligently studying it ….and I really know, feel with the depth of all my reasoning, rational understanding and analytical abilit,y and, what's more, with the depth of my intuitive non-cognitive part of my mind and being….that all paths and branches of knowledge lead to the same conclusion: It's all consicusness … reality, spirituality, the psyche … all the pure and undivided, non-dual, utterly entangled interbeing of one, unitive Meta-Consciousness…. Physics, metaphysics, theology and and psychology all, I believe, point to this same ageless truth. “According to quantum mechanics there is no such thing as objectivity. We cannot eliminate ourselves from the picture. We are a part of nature, and when we study nature there is no way around the fact that nature is studying itself. Physics has become a branch of psychology, or perhaps the other way round.Then Zhukav puts these two threads together to form his startling and liberating conclusion that is upheld as one peruses his history of modern physics from its Newtonian, pre-relativistic roots, through Einsteinian relativistic theory and quantum theory, ending with brilliant conclusions on Bell's theorem and the work of David Bohm - a physicist who likely missed out on the big “prizes” of phsysics, due to both McCarthyism and his metaphysical forays with the enlightened spiritual teacher Jiddu Krishnamurti. Zhukav concludes, conjoining the insights of Jung and Pauli: “If these men are correct, then physics is the study of the structure of consciousness” (emphasis added).Thoughts anyone? |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualityvalli said May 14, 2008, 7:39 AM: |
||
|
hi bruce - folks |
|||
|
|
Re: SpiritualityKatelyn said May 15, 2008, 7:50 PM: |
||
|
oh no. I saw this thread and I was like “oh man… stuff is gonna go down..people are gonna get pompous… dangit…” and I didnt read all of it, but it seems that hasnt been the case so far, so that is cool. |
|||
|
|
Re: Spiritualitybaretoedgirl said May 20, 2008, 11:39 AM: |
||
|
Wow. I've just been reading some of the amazing things people have written here. You have truly sparked a storm of philosophy and thought, very beautiful thoughts… I don't know if what I offer can amount to very much amongst so many others, but I guess my idea of spirituality is a little different from yours, and from a lot of people who wrote here. First of all, I've always thought of myself as a spiritual person, probably because I feel so much, and I have to believe that all of that feeling comes from something divine inside me. Maybe I'm one of those people who believes easily in something more than myself, who almost needs to believe it. But it's almost come easily for me. I've become more spiritual through the years, though my years are not so many yet. I guess because the more I see, the more there is that confirms my belief in an essential beauty, and in God, I suppose. To me, spirituality is that which truly makes a person religious. I don't mean that kind of religiousness that goes through the motions, that believes but does not feel. Religion and spirituality are two seperate ideas, but I think that they complement one another. Certainly religion without spirituality, without that depth of feeling and knowing, seems weak and empty, a food that fails to provide real sustenance and satisfaction. I think there are a lot of religious people who are unhappy, and they don't know why, and I think perhaps part of the reason why is that they cannot really make themselves feel what they practice, it is not real to them, really. | |||

Help


