| |
Hi Peter,
You replied:
Ken's view on politics is much more refined than that. The second part of the audio has just been released, and you can read some details about that here.
If anybody wants to discuss that further, please open a new thread, since it's off-topic.
Thanks for the link, and for the very correct moderator direction to open a new thread, which I've done here.
Though I read the material in the link carefully, I didn't see anything that showed more depth in terms of either of my problems with the original statement - i.e. Left and Right are quite simply and (in my opinion) erroneously assigned to Democrats and Republicans, and Left=external and Right=internal.
In fact, it goes on to say that
… as Ken explains, the second, hidden, civil war is raging smack dab in the middle of the Democratic Party. Quite simply, the new postmodern Left and the old modern Left…
(again presupposing the existence of any true Left within the Democratic Party)
I'd like to leave this issue of where the Democratic Party lies to the side, though, and consider the (to me) more serious problem of summing up the Left as attributing ”the fundamental cause of human suffering to external causes”.
In his introduction to a talk in 2006 on the War on Terror Noam Chomsky presents three basic principles necessary to deal constructively with terrorism. One of them is that “Elementary moral principles matter, even if they have consequences that we would prefer not to face.” This principle, as he shows, has far-reaching implications when ignored, whether we are talking about the Nuremberg trials, or North American assistance and complicity in atrocities throughout the world, or Iraq, and the list goes on.
So, could it be a commitment to internal causes of suffering at their most basic that people on the Left work towards alleviating suffering seemingly due to “external” causes?
|