Explore
Gaia Soulmates
down  About This Group
The Integral Pod

The Integral Pod (formerly I-I+Zaadz, or IIZ) is a discussion group (a.k.a. “pod”) for enthusiasts of the work of Ken Wilber and other proponents of integral thought. Our aim here is to provide a “We-space” for broad discussion of second-tier living, loving and learning. Please read our vision and guidelines – the ...(more)
down  About This Room
This is the place to discuss all things integral, at all levels, but with an emphasis on challenging ourselves and each other through the insights that Integral Theory can provide. [AQAL focus: upper-left (UL), individual/interior, inner transformation]
down  Room Activity
Irmeli : Aletheia
Irmeli posted a reply to the conversation "Pathological Guru/Disciple Relationships?" ()
1Vector3 : "Relentless Wisdom"
1Vector3 posted a reply to the conversation "Pathological Guru/Disciple Relationships?" ()
Mascha : drop
Mascha posted a reply to the conversation "Pathological Guru/Disciple Relationships?" ()
1Vector3 : "Relentless Wisdom"
1Vector3 posted a reply to the conversation "Pathological Guru/Disciple Relationships?" ()
Mascha : drop
Mascha posted a reply to the conversation "Pathological Guru/Disciple Relationships?" ()
1Vector3 : "Relentless Wisdom"
1Vector3 posted a reply to the conversation "Pathological Guru/Disciple Relationships?" ()
down  Group Grapevine
Grey : Integral Ideator (I-I)
Grey Link! Cool! :D (9 months ago)
Grey : Integral Ideator (I-I)
Grey Just testing URLs in the grapevine. This link will take you to Pelle's blog: http://is.gd/ixdm (I want to see if this gets converted to a link or if you have to copy and paste it.) (9 months ago)
Grey : Integral Ideator (I-I)
Grey Oof! Just saw this now, Siona.... Yeah, flutters I think it was... no, "flaps", but I don't like it much. "Flutter" was the name to replace "Grapevine". Anyway, I just used "tweets" here because it's more readily recognizable. :) (9 months ago)
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?
Resultset_previousprevious thread | next threadResultset_next
threaded | unthreaded | newest first


  Cartosys : Enter

The Upper-Right quadrant's role in Belief

Cartosys said Mar 5, 1:45 PM:

 

I stumbled upon an article that somehow measured brain activity in subjects according to their level of belief in god.


“Compared to non-believers, the religious participants showed significantly less activity in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). a portion of the brain that helps modify behavior by signaling when
attention and control are needed, usually as a result of some
anxiety-producing event like making a mistake.”

I can see the Flatlanders now have even more fodder in which to rationally slam the fundies, but as a developmentalist, how does activity in an area of the brain develop without it being “used?”
Certainly Red never would have had any use for such self-critical hardware… 

Perhaps worse,  the Postmodernists have an argument against development in saying “Yeah, you see! If the self critical part is inherent in our biology, then we had originally evolved utilizing self-critical skills.  Society, even at the earliest inceptions (ie Red  + Amber) have conditioned us to put that part of us to sleep!  The world was better off without the Lower Right Quadrant!
 
Anybody got a counter argument to that ? 

;)
Bryan



  1Vector3 : "Relentless Wisdom"

Re: The Upper-Right quadrant's role in Belief

1Vector3 said Mar 5, 2:10 PM:

 

More later, and more on the point, but a drive-by post about Red having no self-critical anxiety. I see Red as having plenty of opportunity for being self-critical and anxious about making mistakes. Just as the first example that comes to mind, people had to be very careful what they said to whom, so as not to offend someone powerful enough to do harm to them. I am sure they made mistakes in this, which caused much self-criticism (I should have known better) and anxiety.

Red folks would also get into self-criticism if they were artisans and failed to live up to their own or someone else’s standards for craftsmanship, especially someone else who had power over their ability to get paying work. And women were constantly afraid of offending men, because their lives depended on them. 

In fact, because violence was so prevalent, to sum it up, there were plenty of opportunities for mistakes which could get you hurt, for self-criticism about these, for anxiety about past and future mistakes, etc. 

So, I think you were a mite global about Red wrt this issue. 

And I don’t even believe the research. Believers can get extremely self-critical and anxious about displeasing God, which is very easy to do, haha.

And I could probably think of other sources of such s/c and anxiety too. I would take a good look at the exact research methodology.

Blessings, OM Bastet

  Cartosys : Enter

Re: The Upper-Right quadrant's role in Belief

Cartosys said Mar 5, 7:57 PM:

 

I definitely think the article is incomplete in it’s overview–as I’m sure it was designed to grab the attention of either side of the “science vs religion” debate.  Many examples of people being self critical (at many Levels) abound and the research could be easily biased if issues were painted with a religious brush i.e. “How would you feel if you did nothing to defend a Muslim who you had witnessed being berated in the public square?” 

Now assuming that, according to the stated research, if a subject had made a decision based on a belief, particularly through a belief that was shared by family plus majority of a community then, yes ANYBODY would feel less critical of themselves.  It doesn’t matter if those people were your parish, the scientific community, or the IP!  That’s all the Lower Left and likely not being taken into account by the researchers!

I suppose I do agree with Red being able to self criticise.  Anyone with values holds themselves to those values, and if you don’t measure up, then you will either wallow in self defeat, or take action.  I suppose that the Red i’ve seen has too often been expressed without restraint (or seemingly without grasp of the concept of restrain). At it’s worse it will value belittling, revenge, ”no conscience,” I guess the behavior that comes from that mentality is hard to see at first, but yes, it’s all in the name of not being, or be seen as weak.  

  1Vector3 : "Relentless Wisdom"

Re: The Upper-Right quadrant's role in Belief

1Vector3 said Mar 5, 10:07 PM:

 

Yes to all that, Bryan. Very perceptive, IMO. Plus:

The term “belief” is susceptible to many definitions. How strongly held? About what kind of thing? Etc.In order to affect brainwave functioning, a belief would have to be pretty deep, not shallowly held….

And, remember in Red, historically anyway, loyalty to the king or lord was a paramount value, at least for men. Breaches with respect to loyalty would be occasions for much inner anguish or at least guilt or self-berating. (Unless, of course, perceived as justified.)

I agree with you, the research probably was not only interpreted but designed and carried out to prove someone’s viewpoint……

Blessings, OM