Explore
Gaia Soulmates
down  About This Group
The Integral Pod

The Integral Pod (formerly I-I+Zaadz, or IIZ) is a discussion group (a.k.a. “pod”) for enthusiasts of the work of Ken Wilber and other proponents of integral thought. Our aim here is to provide a “We-space” for broad discussion of second-tier living, loving and learning. Please read our vision and guidelines – the ...(more)
down  About This Room
Who rocks your world?  Please use this space to discuss your favorite integral/spiritual teachers, pandits, gurus, etc. or any others who have inspired or helped you along your path.
down  Room Activity
Dave : Aristos
Dave started a new conversation - Scott Sonnon - health, fitness, yoga, personal development ()
Jane : riversong
Jane posted a reply to the conversation "Thomas Berry" ()
Lauren : mammal
Lauren posted a reply to the conversation "Thomas Berry" ()
Lauren : mammal
Lauren posted a reply to the conversation "Thomas Berry" ()
Mascha : drop
Mascha posted a reply to the conversation "Thomas Berry" ()
1Vector3 : "Relentless Wisdom"
1Vector3 posted a reply to the conversation "Thomas Berry" ()
down  Group Grapevine
Grey : Integral Ideator (I-I)
Grey Link! Cool! :D (9 months ago)
Grey : Integral Ideator (I-I)
Grey Just testing URLs in the grapevine. This link will take you to Pelle's blog: http://is.gd/ixdm (I want to see if this gets converted to a link or if you have to copy and paste it.) (9 months ago)
Grey : Integral Ideator (I-I)
Grey Oof! Just saw this now, Siona.... Yeah, flutters I think it was... no, "flaps", but I don't like it much. "Flutter" was the name to replace "Grapevine". Anyway, I just used "tweets" here because it's more readily recognizable. :) (9 months ago)
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?
Resultset_previousprevious thread | next threadResultset_next
threaded | unthreaded | newest first


  adastra : Curious Mutant

Stuart Davis

adastra said Nov 15, 2006, 12:42 PM:

 

I love the guy.  He's funny as hell, spiritual as shit and then some, and has incredible lyrics and tons of energy and enthusiasm.  Plus he writes some really entertaining and insightful stuff on his blog.  In this thread I'll probably quote some lyrics and blog stuff, and I'd encourage any other Stu fans here to do the same.

Here's one of my favourite blog entries of his; all of the movies on his list are great.  WATCH THEM.  You'll be glad you did.  :)

Top Five Mystical Films

Submitted by stuart davis on June 3, 2005 - 10:06am.

Song Of The Day: Cut Off Your Head / Jim's Big Ego
Word Of The Day: Gematria / A cabbalistic method of interpreting the Hebrew Scriptures by computing the numerical value of words, based on those of their constituent letters. (from the Aramaic 'gimatreya', which is from Greek 'geometria')


All right, I've been thinking about movies a bit more since my recent blog on Star Wars. Here now, is my Top Five All-Time Esoteric Major Motion Pictures. It's pretty easy to compose this list, since there are literally only a handful of films that even possess a developed sense of the Mystery, but they have been mind-blowing masterpieces, and I have listed them below. Think of this list as a papal dictate; It's eternal, issued directly from God THROUGH me, and wholly infallible. But even with God herSelf on my side, there must be a method to this ranking, and I will now tell you how I calibrate my system. There are four crucial items for a film making it on this list:


1, Was it ENTERTAINING? Setting aside the Mystery, did I get bored? That's why Waking Life is not on this list, it put me to sleep. Yeah, I know it was deep and brilliant, and it's all one huge Buddhist metaphor, but it was boring. What The Bleep did not make it on this list because for starters that chick Ramtha is just fucking weird, not Good Weird either, she reminds me of some Scientologist Branch Davidian Adi Da Devote. Here's a little note to the kids hanging at her table in the Mystical lunch room: STARING without blinking while you talk to someone is not an indication of the depth of your spiritual realization. It is a sign of your spooky perversion. Knock it off. Anyway, category #1 is HOW ENTERTAINING WAS IT?


2, Depth of REALIZATION. Category two in our candidate's challenge is measured by the “Depth Finder”. What you do is simply take the ENTIRE contents of the film -its script, its direction, cinematography, the degree of stabilized awakening of each of its primary actors and actresses- and drop them into the Abyss Of Love (located in the non-locatable center of YOU, and if you don't know where that is, come back to this blog in a few more life times). Once you release the film into that Void, you count; One, Two, Three, Four, and so on. If a film bounces back up to you within 30 seconds, I hate to say it, but YOU do not have an adequate access to the Abyss, and the movies are being rejected for measurement because of your insufficient realization. If the movies bounce back within 60 seconds, they are being rejected because of limitations inherent in the FILM, and they cannot be considered for inclusion in our Top Five All Time Awesome Esoteric Films.


3, Capacity to INHABIT and EXPRESS its realization. It's one thing for a film to possess great depth of ~!~?~!~ (Waking Life, What The Bleep), but it's another entirely for it to express the trans-rational insight with surprise, beauty, and a profound sense of Un-Knowing that leaves us in awe and wonder at the Miraculous way it all fits together once we detonate the Kosmic Question Mark in our heart. Also known as the Backward Step, this is true Zero-Point energy, as it emanates out of the value 'Zero' issued from the Point Of All Places. Again, if you do not have access to the non-locatable Point Of All Places or our numerical origin in Zero-Sum, in terms of conducting this research you are not a sufficiently advanced Human Biological Measuring Instrument. This is also why virtually ALL film critics and their criticism are irrelevent when it comes to these films and related discussions. These films are beyond their province. Period. Not one critic had a CLUE when it came to Mulholland Drive, because they are critics, not practitioners, they are not agents in the ~!~?~!~….yet. For now, relying on Leonard Maltin and Gene Shalit to tell us what Mulholland Drive is about is like giving a box of Rubic's cubes to drugged monkeys. It's an inappropriate combination.


4, CONFLUENCE. Above all else, these films must transmit ~!~?~!~ to us through a confluence of powers which transcend any of their constituent parts. Being ENTERTAINING (#1) is “necessary, but not sufficient” for the activation of depth of REALIZATION (to paraphrase Ken Wilber), which is necessary but not sufficient for the capacity to INHABIT AND EXPRESS the Backward Step, which is necessary but not sufficient for pollination of the God-Flower “IS” in the Human Being, and it goes on and on. The Zero-Sum is not beholden to its parts, but the Promise would never deliver without their accord. One missing part will fracture the Whole; If you have every other element in line, but you have a confused, deluded actor or actress in the lead, forget it. It's now going to be Vanilla Sky instead of Thin Red Line. The same principle applies to all four quadrants. I always wondered why Zoolander wasn't more successful (not that it's in the running for this list, but it's a tangential example), till someone pointed out that it was released at the time of 9/11, and the public just wasn't up for a funny movie, it sort of got buried. In one sense, the public is never ready for the movies in the list below, because they present such significant challenges to World Views, to our notions of Reality, our sense of identity; Their greatness comes from a willingness to question our basic assumptions, but do it in ways that are not half-baked (Phenomenon- Hey Jon, Hubbard called and the space ship will you pick you up at midnight) megalomaniacally indulgent (The Passion- hey, Mel, Manson called and he wants his brain back), judgemental (Saved- hey Brian Dannelly, Irony and Stereotype called, they wanted to thank you for hooking them up and let you know they gave birth to a 92-Minute baby they're naming Flatland), or careful to “protect us” from the death of our relative, finite self-identity (Life Or Something Like It- Angelina, Lateral Movement called and said if you just drop your selfish tack on romance and fear of death, it will reward you with the perfect guy and postpone your death). The truly great esoteric films -like truly great esoteric teachers- understand that the combination which unlocks our largest Love is not going to come from pandering to our shallow desire for comfort, or our self-reinforcing addiction to consolation in the form of Story Morphine coupled with pretty pictures. Great esoteric movies employ a creative algorythym which cannot be reversed engineered, duplicated, or even deduced.


Lastly, I want to point out that this is a list of the top five Esoteric films, meaning those exhibiting conscious participation in the Mystery through film. There are many totally kick ass movies that won't be on this list cuz they're just not Esoteric films. Garden State, Manhatten, Dr. Zhivago and a hundred others would make my list of Masterpieces, but that's a different list. And I do have to say that I think the list of films below are in a category by themselves, and it is indeed the Greatest of the Greats. It's hard enough to make a kick ass film, but it's a truly singular feat of Integral Genius to accomplish what the films below have done; Going deep AND wide with an utterly unique invention. I give you now, the

Top Five Esoteric Films:


#5, American Beauty


It's all there, a panormic display of surfaces, lust, desire, greed, confusion, repression, hope and fear, all building into vortex of ultimate release detonated in that climactic the Death of Delusion. Each of these perfect characters are an aspect of our Self, dancing through the choreography of pain known as the human condition until we are finally left exposed, bare, and transparent to experience of Divinity hiding in each wound. This film is the magnificent embodiment of the Leonard Cohen lyric “there is a crack in everything, that's how the Light gets in…”. Kevin Spacey's voice-over in the last moments of the movie stand as some of the greatest secret teaching to make their way into the hearts of millions in the history of our collective search. A Western film through and through, it carries all of the potency of the World's wisdom traditions in a truly Occidental fashion, celebrating and embracing our unique conundrum in this time and age, forging new Alchemical Keys for this culture, instead of going for the easy-cheesy formula of feeding more Eastern snacks to hungry Westerners that can't -and shouldn't- digest Eastern soup. And that in itself is an enormous gift that will go on for generations. American Beauty is the Dharma springing to life in North America, a midwife to a baby Buddha bouncing through suburbs and strip malls, using a midas touch to unveil the Reality Behind the Appearances in our fascination with the constellation of distractions we so often mistake for “meaning”.


#4, Dancer In The Dark


Bjork's performance in this films is, by itself a miracle. It's exceedingly rare to find a performer so capable and willing to surrunder so completely in each moment of a song, to fearlessly explore and celebrate all the facets of being, and to harness it with gifts of expression that are truly historical. This is the musical difference between Bjork and Radiohead; While radiohead is chronically trapped and fused with the postmodern malaise, mesmerized by the innumerable shades of the Shadow passing over the planet, and admirably devoted to sounding a warning to the sleepwalkers, Bjork is actually able to lead us through it, to drop us profound hints left and right, that if you gaze into the Puzzle without clenching any certain lense, the vision changes. It is not only dark, it is not only light. While artists like Radiohead seem determined to expose the sinister Conspiracy at every turn, Bjork has found a freedom that allows her to look at things from any angle, since she's not ultimately married to any one view, she can see through the Shadow that is Radiohead's Eclipse. Bjork knows the way out of the Haunted House, but she doesn't sugar-coat it for us either. We get a real sense of what this Occidental Goddess is up to in Dancer In The Dark every time she bursts into phrases like these:


I've seen it all, I've seen the dark
I've seen the brightness in one little spark.
I've seen what I chose and I've seen what I need,
And that is enough, to want more would be greed.
I've seen what I was and I know what I'll be
I've seen it all - there is no more to see!

You've seen it all and all you have seen
You can always review on your own little screen
The light and the dark, the big and the small
Just keep in mind - you need no more at all
You've seen what you were and know what you'll be
You've seen it all - there is no more to see!


In addition to the insane vulnerability she holds through the entire film and the desperate intimacy we come to have with her character's plight, she continually dunks us into the Music of the Spheres. Her character hears and experiences music everywhere, emanating from everything, reminding us that all we have to do is adjust our Self, and we become antennas, instantly submerged in a infinite song that's always there, we've just filtered it out, compressed the infinite into bite-sized bits that our separate self finds more manageable. In a beautiful turn of surprise, silence is an incredibly powerful felt presence in this movie, and shows up over and over in a way that amplifies all the emotional force of the struggle to maintain contact with that invisible beauty of the God-song. Perhaps most important is how richly varied that song is, at turns comforting, sweet, and then achingly bitter and somber. Listening and watching Bjork, I can't help be reminded how limited my frequency can become, as I give in again and againn to the seduction of parsing that Big Song into tiny phrases. But then remembering that, I'm inspired to surrender again into letting it just be what is IS, not what I want it to be. This film again, doesn't make any attempt to inject us with pre-fab spirituality or the easy insights, but it shines through with all the Shadow and Light of Love, because Bjork is one of those rare Prisms that is willing and able to include every luminous event in the spectrum, from black hole to effulgent super-nova.


#3, Thin Red Line


In the opening of this film, we hear the Narrative voice say something like “Who are you to assume so many forms?” as his character floats through a secret Eden in the jungle, and that phrase sets the tone for the entire film. Through the eyes of the lead character Witt, we perceive the Presence of the Mystery in everyone, in every thing, all within the most radical paradox humanity has produced: War. Through some of the most brilliant direction and cinematography ever produced on the big screen, we are allowed into the secret life of God, but not in any manner we might expect from our conditioned, programmed notions of the Divine. This is a film that opens the aperture in the audience, and without sidestepping the agonizing brutality, without denying the painful contradictions of love and life, lifts us above and beyond the limits of our brain and its endless battles (the war of separate selves, occuring all around, while in the midst of it, the Self abides and includes all equally, without judgment). In the middle of death, disease, darkness, the movie deftly opens parallel vistas, glimpses of some Unknowable going on about its business, bathed in light, adorned in color and beauty, continuing its inexorable flow of Life not only in spite of the darkness of war, but in concert with it, in participation with it in ways our heads will never grasp, but our hearts are always teetering on the edge of discovering. And this movie is a gentle push, sending us tumbling over the event horizon into a place of disappearing. In the end, when Witt meets his death and makes a conscious choice to let himself be killed instead of captured, it is in the heart, not the head, that we recognize that we resting in something that cannot be killed, it is unborn, undying, and after watching Witt live as this reality for so much of the film, we are there with him as he sees the enemy soldiers and himself, and the beauty of the jungle, and the millions of individual stories and lifetimes of insects, animals, plants, people, countries, planets, and all that ever was or will be, as ONE. As Genpo Roshi once said, “it's only confusing if you try to understand it.” At the moment of death, Witt (short for “witness”?) radiates more than ever, released into everything around him, inlcuding us, and we are left with a palpable experience of that which is truly indestructable, and indescribable. How could we ever wish for more from a movie?


#2, Mulholland Drive


It's widely known David Lynch has been a meditator for decades, and that certainly goes a long way toward helping us decipher this film, in as much as “deciphering” refers to the intuitive apprehension of trans-rational insight. Mulholland Drive is perhaps the most mis-understood, mis-interpreted film to come down the popular pipe line in the history of Hollywood. I'm here to give you my Shamanic rendering of this unequaled masterpiece. Mulholland Drive takes place in the Bardo. The film begins with a death, and from there on out we are witnessing the constituent aspects of (separate) self unravelling in the subtle dimensions which comprise experience between bodily incarnations. Although those same dimensions of experience are present right now, right here as you read these words, the corporeal body acts as an effective filter, conveniently stratifying domains of experience into waking, dreaming, and deep dreamless sleep (thanks, Neo Cortex!). When the human body is removed from that equation, the self / other boundary, as well as that accumulated experience previously mistaken for “self” begins to come undone. All you believed begins to unweave as the contents of “ME” dissolve through repeated dunkings (bouncings) into the Divine, pure light of unfiltered, un-mediated ISness. And that brings us to a terribly FUCKING interesting news flash which should be of interest to any incarnated human being (that's YOU, in case you are wondering): #1, If you dont' meditate or practice some equivalent form of awareness training, your SOUL is going to totally fucking black out after you die. You will see all kinds of fun or terrifying lights and fireworks which you may (mistakenly) interpret as “others” or “events”, but they are, without a doubt, the contents and epiphenomena of your very own SELF. If you have not stabilized (while incarnated) your awareness through waking, dreaming, and deep dreamless sleep, chances are, no matter what the fuck you “believed” while alive as a human being, you are going to disintegrate like the whispy, transient fuck you are, and immediately be spit back into another life time as a human being, or a rat, or a kangaroo, or whatever the hell your appropriate container may be. That's the facts, jack. We MUST develop and train our awareness until we are permanently stabilized in that Self which is not contingent upon any particular state (waking, dreaming, sleeping) or aspect of our relative self (sex, age, race, yadda yadda). That is, we must do that IF we want to be effective, active agents in the Mystery. Becasue, #2, There is no way to conduct ourselves as effective Bodhisattvas unless we have done so. If we're just going to fucking black out every time there's a state change, or an excarnation, or a shift in the vibrational frequency of form, then we're just more fucking flotsam jetsam that can't hold its Dhukkha in the Samsaric binge-drinking that is known as ~!~?~!~. If you want to see what it's like for someone to die and navigate the Bardo while they are not conscious of what's going on (what makes you think you're even going to realize you're dead?), then watch Mulholland Drive. And then do everyone a favor and start meditating. There are an infinite number of sentient beings, and the appropriate expression and inhabitation of our Love, our true, free real Self which is LOVE- is to work for the liberation of them all. Doing that effectively requires an advanced understanding of every nook and cranny in the caves of experience known as Being. We must become expert spelunkers through the catacombs of interior and exterior tunnels of humanity, through waking, dreaming, and deep dreamless sleep. Let's go. Let's wake up and serve LOVE, not the minutia churning about in that nexus of phantoms we call an “i”. Mulholland Drive fucking rocks, because this is the stunning non-verbal directive emitted from every revelatory frame.


#1, I Heart Huckabees


Holy Shit. This little Miracle is #1 on the list because not only does it do everything the first four movies on the list do, but it doesn't even bother to take itself seriously. HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!! Birth, life, death, love, clutching, release, evil, good- this movie infuses all the secrets of our personal stories with Nitrus Oxide, and puts them in a zero-gravity bumper car smash up. People smashing each other in the face with inflatable balls to conjure mini satoris, people fucking in the mud after existential break-throughs, people tugging at one little thread in that careful tapestry of identity and watching the whole thing unweave and catch fire- literally. This movie is fucking brilliant, and hilarious, and anyone who thinks it's one iota less “deep” or “profound” than the first four films on the list needs to get fucked in the mud by a French deconstructionist. You ever meet those “spiritual” types that take themselves so seriously, and exude such a pretentious fucking disgusting sense of importance and gravity? I mean BESIDES ME, mother fuckers! This film is the antidote to all those egotistical shits masquerading as liberated beings. You know what? The Mystery is not supposed to feel like a Mr. Yuck Face all the time. “More serious” does not mean “deeper”. The CONCEPT and AFFECTATION of seriousness is every bit as shallow and transient as humor or levity. And that's one of the many gifts of this film, FINALLY someone has made a brilliant film about the deep questions, and is free enough to let it all go in the next moment. You ever see those monks spend weeks making sand paintings, and then blow them all away when they're done. That's all ANY of us are doing. That's the point, there's no one variety of impermanent phenomena that's any more enduring than the next -it's ALL vapor, the monks just know that, whereas the rest of operate under the assumption something will last, that there's something that continues “on” from our work. What “on”? The end of time does not exist somewhere in the future, it's RIGHT HERE. No-time exists right here, with “time”, you just take the Step Backwards, and POOF! our bullshit world of concepts, events, identities, and the sum total of that lie known as History is GONE. There has never been a human insight greater than a laugh. The shortest distance to realization is in a laugh, and if you haven't laughed, your realization is not whole, not complete, and not deep. It's ALL the punch line. And what's so funny? All those opposites, the endless assemblies of binary tensions we built our bullshit lives around, were all, every last one of them, perfectly complimentary aspects of our very own ever present Self. now that's funny. All murder was suicide. All enemies were siblings. All shadows were beacons. All walls were windows. It is an incredibly auspicious sign that this movie was actually made, and made it to theaters, and did relatively well with the public. Perhaps we're ready to cross over the threshold in the popular arts, and have a few more bands like Live and U2, and have a few more books like A Brief History Of Everything, and have a few more movies like I Heart Huckabees, and Mulholland Drive, Thin Red Line, Dancer In The Dark, and American Beauty.


We are a culture pregnant with the greatest of possibilities. Let's start pushing.


» stuart davis's blog

  Punk Monk  : Post Metaphysical Punk

Re: Stuart Davis

Punk Monk said Nov 18, 2006, 5:55 PM:

 

I really thought that I  loved stuart davis and his records and then I saw him perform live at Schubbas in Chicago for his new album release “What!?”

And then the heavens opened up and the entire audience was struck with exstatic love and light and beauty and I realized that the depth of his music was bottomless!

“Should it matter that my mind won't fit back in my head?”

“Shut up, shut up, shut up, Up already with the temple talk, your freakin me out!”

S. Davis


I can't get enough of this guy,

What about the stuart davis show!?

Benji

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Nov 19, 2006, 11:09 AM:

 

His latest album is amazing, isn't it?  BTW are you an actual “Punk Monk” helping to promote his shows etc.?  Does he still have that whole set up happening? 

I love his lyrics, and felt disappointed that they aren't included in the latest album; at least they are online with additional commentary.  One of my favourites on the new album (and of his entire body of work, actually) is Easter, it's an amazing song.  Here are the lyrics, with his blog commentary:

Cliff Notes On the New CD / Easter

Song Of The Day: Easter
Word Of The Day: Clastic / having separate pieces, take apart-able.

Easter was one of the first “Big Mind” songs. It was written shortly after I'd first done Big Mind with Genpo Roshi, I was in one of those despondant, self-pitying cycles. Despressed, dejected. My daughter was in her cholic phase of infancy, screaming like a banshee -literally- six to eight hours a night. Only when I held her, of course. I thought my life was over. No sex, no rock 'n roll, no touring, no money, no partying or freedom. Instead, it was all sleep deprivation and imasculating torture from the feminine forces of the World (Headline: “Wife-Daughter Tag Team Annhilates Alpha Male”). But, I had learned Big Mind with Roshi, and funny enough, one of the voices came to the fore immediately in response to my self-pity. I think it was the Master. And the Master was not happy with this whiny victim. The Master was like, looking around at all the deities, going “Can you believe this guy? Can you BELIEVE this guy?” Then he leaned into me and was like “SHUT THE FUCK UP. You piece of shit. I sent you not one, but TWO Dakinis, and all you can do is sulk?!” So, then the Master wrote the song Easter, and told me I would have to play it thousands of times, to really remember. The whole song is sung from the Master's voice (when he sings 'this master' it's mocking me, like I'm a faux-master, pseudo master, poseur master) except when he throws it over to the chick, who is the Daughter of Man (Jesus' sister).

This is certainly one of my favorite songs I've (well, ok, the Master) ever written. Lyrically, musically, vibe-wise, Easter is really one of those rare numbers you know will have a long life. Alex Gibson produced the fucker like a home run too, and it SOUNDS un-fucking BELIEVABLE on the record. Nate Jenkins made these weird sounds and stuff, and I don't even know how to describe what he did, but damn.

Easter is in large part, a big wake-up call to that old Zen-boy syndrome, the enduring inclination (almost always a masculine thing) to ascend, to bypass that whole messy affair of the manifest realm, just hang out in your Zen tree fort in the Causal clouds. It's a pernicious proclivity in ascenders. In Wilber's model, there's ascending current, and descending current. Transcendent, immanent. Manifest, void. See? Form is emptiness, emptiness is form. But too often the boys get lopsided and it slips into a “Form is emptiness. Emptiness is emptiness.” Ha. So, then the send the Dakinis in, and they administer babies, and diapers, and the mundane gravity of familial convention, which is of course always -ALWAYS- the most exalted spiritual teaching in disguise. Decoys, people. 'S all decoys. God has no “other”. Anyway, my thanks to the Master for this song, which did help a lot, and still does.

Clues on this song:
Crows are a symbol to me, although of what I'm not sure. I saw a painting by Nantenbo once, and it really, really fucked with my head. It's my favorite painting of all time, it's called Crows. (Zen Master Tenkei Denson was seen one day feeding some crows. Later he was seen sweeping ants off the path. A monk asked him, “Why do you feed the crows and sweep away the ants?” He said, “Because I like crows and I don't like ants.”)
The Witness is that which is aware of all that arises, but the Witness itself has no qualities, no location, no characteristics. It is aware of phenomena, it's ever-present, without birth or death, but is aware of birth, death, and everything that goes with the collastomy bag of Being (including Bliss).
Caprophogy is eating shit. You can't find it even if you google, but look it up in the OED. Great word.

In the midst of perfection
this princess starts bitching
In the arms of Elijah
this infant keeps twitching
this “master” that's teaching
is a pupil repeating
this boxer loves headlines
but he couldn't take a punch line

Somebody slap me
I can't stop laughing
Suicide is back in fashion
All ascenders end up sinking
makes Love wonder
what fear's thinking

Two crows
sit at your window
keeping a vigil over your widow
Two coins
drop in a casket
over your sockets
(bury that bastard)
Two-thirds
ready for Easter
thinking you're Jesus
proving your Ceasar
ready for Easter

Right posture, right poses
too bad what's under the robes is
Still cross-eyed
in the witness
and searching for suchness
Back home, God's diamond
puts a diaper on the daughter
of a
Mystical martyr
who triggered a seizure
making believe that
his body's a disease
He's wishing for a World where
his vapor could thrive
giving up his life
(as if he were alive)
He would have his wings
if feathers came from crutches
or that cushion he clutches

Somebody slap me
I can't stop laughing
suicide is back in fashion
all ascenders end up sinking
makes Love wonder
what fear's thinking

Two crows
sit at the window
keeping a vigil
over your widow
Two coins
drop in a casket
over your sockets
bury that bastard
Two-thirds
ready for Easter
thinking you're Jesus
proving your Ceasar
ready for Easter

In the eye of a white tornado
in the pit of a black volcano
In the palm of a human hand
there's a grain of this quick-sand

[woman's voice]

I'm just a girl
with the planet inside of me
I'm the Daughter of Man
but the Men have been fighting me
I bathed my brother
and my brother ignited me
Divinity's twins
till some devil divided
the Goddess
from the Hominid's oddysey
I am
I am what I am
I am an antidote
to New Age philosophy
I am epicac
to this mythic caprophogy

(Refrain)

  latitudarian : wide-eyed student

Re: Stuart Davis

latitudarian said Nov 19, 2006, 2:57 PM:

 

Yea! The Stuart Davis Show is so integral. He has guests like Genpo Roshi and practices the art of perspective taking. His humor is expansive in that it covers so much and I think anyone can find it entertaining. He is never old or repeating things, it just seems so fresh to me. And to comment on Easter, fucking c'mon, is there any lyrics more amazing than the chorus to that song. I have'nt had a chance to listen to anything more than whats on Integral Naked and the new c.d., which I bought with the quickness. It was a good idea to start a Stu blog. Keep 'em coming!

  Punk Monk  : Post Metaphysical Punk

Re: Stuart Davis

Punk Monk said Nov 19, 2006, 6:33 PM:

 

No, I am an offical Fake Punk Monk, kinda like Colbert is a fake news reporter.

However I did confess this to him on his myspace account comments section at one time.

And he actually disbanded that group, as far as I've heard, and I believe that it wasn't pretty.


Favorite Albums

1. Bell
2. Bright Apocalypse


Really they are all good, I do like how his music has become less folky and more rockin and sophisticated stylistically now.

Is there anything cooler than Stu Davis taking the voices of big mind and turning them into characters for his show?!

-Ben

Rockin around the spiral

  aeryck : Seeking the Unseekable

Re: Stuart Davis

aeryck said Nov 21, 2006, 11:29 AM:

 

This was one of my first posts on my blog:

A Real Bodhisattva

Today, while listening to “Flower of a Zero” by Stuart Davis, it really sank in just how authentically spiritual Stuart is. His approach to spiritual responsibility is what I strive for. He knows that God cannot be found by just sitting on a cushion. That aspect of practice is important, and he does that, as do I. But Stuart knows that if you really want to find God, you have to take off the goggles, take out the nose-plug, and dive into the muck of humanity. To me, that’s what real Bodhisattvas do. They aren’t afraid to get dirty in order to experience all the various aspects of their own being and the dark sides of their fellow humans.

I don’t think you can be a truly effective spiritual practitioner or help others along their own spiritual path as long as you are anti-anything. As long as there are aspects of life that you are not willing to engage, you cannot be effective, because your filters do not allow you to see the present moment as it is. You have to be willing to give up everything you believe to be true and take each moment as it comes, and accept each person for where they are at, and understand that “there are no rules.”

Back to Stuart and Flower of a Zero. In this incredible song, he challenges us to be willing to go all the way in order to reach a hand out and help people struggle on their path. He dives into the realities that face those around us:

“Daddy likes polishing a pistol.
Mother digs fingerin’ her bible.
Sister’s stuck under an uncle.
I got a brother down bingin’ in the basement”

and presents the challenge:

“What’s another bruise in the belly?
Can’t you take a punch like a lover?
Don’t you wanna dance in the gutter…
for the flower of a zero?”

My interpretation of Flower of a Zero is simply the awakening of a human being. From “zero” to “flower”. What are you willing to do to help wake people up? Who are you willing to help? How far will you go? This verse literally gives me goose bumps every time I hear it:

“Shakin’ shadows outta the mortals.
You duke it out until the Devil is dizzy.
Breakin’ knuckles, fuckin’ climbin’ a spiral.
Diggin’ jewels outta the jungle”

That’s exactly it. Breakin’ knuckles to grow and find the best in yourself (jewels), overcome your obstacles (shadows), and help others do the same. This doesn’t happen on a mat in the lotus position. It happens when you engage with those around you who make you uncomfortable. Alcoholic mother? Drug-addicted brother? Schizophrenic sister? Who aren’t you willing to fight for? Can you enter the world of those around you who aren’t as “spiritually advanced” as you and discuss things important to them? Or just hang out with them to learn about yourself and see what makes you uncomfortable? Is the pain worth it?

Stuart tells us: “Shake it, cut it, open a vessel. A couple wounds could give you a vineyard.” In what ways are you holding back from your responsibility as a Bodhisattva? I struggle constantly with these issues. It is so much easier to surround myself with like-minded people in a safe environment. But I know that my path requires more from me. And so I fight. For my own growth and yours.

Stuart Davis is an example for all of us. I highly recommend listening to his music, seeing him in concert, and reading his blog. But remember, he “dances in the gutter” for the flower of a zero. So be ready for anything. Stuart has few filters.

If you haven’t listened to Stuart, you can buy and download every song from all his albums. “Flower of a Zero” is on the Bell album.

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Nov 21, 2006, 12:52 PM:

 

Hey Aeryck

Great riff on Flower of a Zero - that was the song that I first bonded with; prior to that I couldn't get into his music, having listened to a few of his songs here and there.  But I listened to this one once, and couldn't get it out of my head for two days.  A while after that I went to one of his shows and that's when I became a fan - his live shows are something to see, for sure.

The phrase “flower of a zero” for me also has connotations of the manifest world coming into being from the unmanifest.  All of this is the flower of a zero…

breakin' knuckles, fuckin' climbing a spiral,
arthur

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Nov 25, 2006, 7:00 PM:

 

Here's an entertaining rant by Stuart Davis against flatland atheism:

Open Letter To Rational Pundits

Song of the Day: A Sorta Fairy Tale / Tori Amos
Word of the Day: Esurient / Hungry or greedy

I have had the good fortune in this life to interview people like Sam Harris, who's wonderful book The End Of Faith spent a long, long time on the New York Times best seller list, and who's new book is Letter To A Christian Nation. But, after reading this article by Richard Dawkins, I am sorry, but I have to rant.

Is anyone still interested in this insanely FLAT approach to the (very real) problem of fundamentalism in religion? Flat, flat, flat. And as brilliant and eloquent as people like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris are, they are persuading no one. And they never will. Because they, and the general contingency of their allies, REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT. Here's something I desperately wish these authors could simply recognize and include as part of their work: PEOPLE DEVELOP. That means people's World-Views develop, there are simply, undeniably LEVELS of deveopment. Although Mythic Religious Imperialist like George Bush and similar Apocalyptic Colostamy Bags can be excused from some of the following vitriol, the likes of Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins deserve extra helpings. They write books bemoaning and lamenting (rightly so) the dangerous, toxic riddle that is fundamentalism, mythic religious zeal, but simultaneously decline to acknowledge that vexing World View (Mythic) is one of many in humanity's Vertical Unfolding. In fact, THEIR own perpsective -one which allows for such critical thinking (rational)- is also one of the stations along that vertical unfolding. Human social development has, through the ages, included these stages:

Archaic
Magic
Mythic
Rational
Pluralistic
Integral

There are many ways to describe development (and there are different kinds of development). In the simplest terms, we can say there are pre-conventional, conventional, and post-conventional World views. We could also be more sophisticated and use models of social holarchy, including the content and contours of each wave of social / cultural development as it has emerged. However you prefer it: DEVELOPMENT IS A FACT OF LIFE, and leaving it out of the equation, as nearly 99.9% of these types of authors do -on both sides of the debate- is no longer acceptable. Sorry. You're done. SHUT UP unless you are at least, at a minimum, acknowledge the FACT that most of what you are bitching about (again, rightly so), is a feature of DEVELOPMENT, and not simply “choice” or a “mistake”. You cannot PERSUADE a MYTHIC RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALIST to stop believing in a Mythic God, or the apocalypse, and the narrative of a personal deity, ANYMORE THAN YOU CAN PERSUADE A five year old child to become 27 years old. It's not stupid or wrong to act five years old if you're five years old. It's not a mistake to be five years old. It is, however, wrong to act like a five year old if you're 27, and there is where something more interesting occurs. Because Sam Harris and Richard Dawkings do identify and articulate a very serious problem in our World, but the FAIL to ADMIT it is a developmental problem, not an intellectual one. Their books will do NOTHING TO HELP, because they don't deal with (or even acknowledge) development. Does ANYONE actually believe George Bush can be persuaded his religious beliefs are ludicrous through DISCOURSE? If you believe that, you are more fanciful and deluded than he is. BUT, is it possible George Bush could DEVELOP? That he might grow, expand, and enter into a new perspective? Yes, it is. It happens. Not always, not necessarily, but it does happen. And that is the interesting question. How, why, when do people evolve to higher altitudes of consciousness? Ironically, what ardent Evolutionists and Rationalists miss is that the solution IS EVOLUTION. We must get people to evolve to higher, deeper, more inclusive levels of develeopment. You can't persuade them. You can't convince them. It's not a choice, it's a WORLD VIEW.

It is not healthy to act like a five year old if you're twenty-seven. It's PATHOLOGICAL. Similarly, it's not appropriate for the most powerful government in the World to operate under a Mythic Religious compass regarding geo-political policy. It is a nightmare, and it is arrested development. 2,000 years ago when the Romans were bringing a Rule / Order World view onto the map (convention), they were LIFTING humanity up to a new, higher order of social enterprise. From pre-conventional bandits and tribes to conventional Imperial State with codes of conduct and citizenship. It was upward, and one of the biggest advances up to that time. However… 2,000 years later, it's not something to brag about. It's not so cool, because AFTER that Mythic / Rule-Order World view emerged, so did a Rational one ( Western Enlightenment, anyone?), and so did a Pluralistic World View (the sixties, Post-Modernism baby! wooo!), and so did an Integral World View (yay!). It's not desirable in the scheme of Homo-Homo Sapiens to employ World Views that were antiquated (in terms of the highest good for the greatest number) hundreds or thousands of years ago. Especially in the highest office of the World's most powerful nation. Very, very bad. When a President thinks God talks to him, and he's got a bible in one hand and a nuclear military in the other… not good.

But the question is not whether that's bad (of course it is), or whether mythic religion is a bunch of preposterous, ridiculous poison (It is). The question is, HOW DO WE GET PEOPLE TO DEVELOP TO HIGHER, DEEPER WORLD VIEWS?? Because NOTHING ELSE WILL WORK. I cannot stand, I cannot STOMACH listening to one more smart, snappy scientist, or philosopher, or academic, who's going to write another article, another book, make another speech deploring the (very real) danger of Mythic Religion and the “God Delusion” WITHOUT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGING DEVELOPMENT!!

Come on. Jesus fucking CHRIST. Would you use that approach with your five year old child? No, and the whole World would look at you like the obstinate shithead you are if you tried to, because the Kid is FIVE. Five year olds are SUPPOSED to believe in Harry Potter, or Jesus, or Voodoo, or whatever they fancy. But not when they're twenty seven. Well listen, our PRESIDENT IS LIVING WITH THE WORLD VIEW OF A FIVE YEAR OLD. I know, it sucks. THE MYTHIC RELIGIOUS POPULACE OF AMERICA AND ISLAM ARE INHABING THE WORLD VIEW OF FIVE YEAR-OLDS. I know, it REALLY sucks, because they would actually love to render civilization undone in order to validate their vivid delusion. But the delusion, my friends, is DEVELOPMENTAL. And you cannot PERSUADE a five year old to be 27. And you cannot persuade Pat Robertson, or Jerry Falwell, or President Bush to be RATIONAL because they possess PRE-RATIONAL world views.

I know, you're saying “But they do other things rationally. If I told them you had some ocean front property for sale in Montana, they would be suspicious. They would doubt it, want proof, and so don't they have access to rationality, but they just don't use it? If i'm smart enough, eloquent enough, persuasive and brilliant enough, wont' they just WAKE UP????

NO.

People do not only move through levels, or altitudes, or stages of Vertical development (World Views), but also possess many LINES of development. That's why a really SMART nerd-ass scientist might not necessarily be ETHICAL, or INTUITIVE, or FUNNY, or SEXY. We have many different capacaties, qualities, LINES of development, and this “spiritual” perspective is JUST ONE of many, and they develop INDEPENDENTLY. Good looking? Doesn't make you smart. Smart? Doesn't make you ethical. Ethical? Doesn't make you agile. This is COMMON FUCKING SENSE. For details, see Ken Wilber's work.

Rational Pundits, Authors, Public Figures…

I BEG YOU, I PLEAD, I BESEECH YOU to stop being such FLATLAND FUCK FACES, and simply begin to ACKNOWLEDGE DEPTH. Acknowledge that people, and societies, and cultures, develop through altitudes of World Views. If we don't want to live in a country that is ruled by right-wing facist religious zealots, then we had better begin to ask ourselves HOW PEOPLE DEVELOP BEYOND such low-level world views.

Rationalists of the World, were you BORN with that rational World view? Was there ever a time in your life when you were three, or four, or five, when you encountered and interpreted the world differently than you do now? Have you developed at all, or did you pop out of your mother completely possessed of the skeptical capacity to inquire and confirm through direct experience? Of course you developed. You were a pre-rational little brat long before you became a rational brat.

Knowing this, are you interested at all in how other people who are not yet at your Rational World view might develop? Would you like to help them, or would you like to opine to the converted choir for the BILLIONTH TIME? Because listen, the sun will expan and consume the Earth before you convert RELIGIOUS FUNDAMENTALISTS with your Rational blather. They cannot hear you. No one hears you, except those who are already at your altitude, your level of World view, or are ready to enter into it (for reasons that have nothing to do with your rhetoric). We had better figure out how to see depth, experience altitudes of awareness, and embrace development, or those lower stations will render us undone.

Rationalists, ask yourself, since you developed through Archaic, Magic, Mythic (all pre-rational World views) up to your Rational World view, is it POSSIBLE there are other World views which are yet deeper, higher, more inclusive than the one you now inhabit?

Imagine that.

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Jan 9, 2007, 12:03 PM:

 

In an Integral Naked thread titled Stuart Davis, SusanAskwith said:

I've listened to Stuart's music. Some of it I like; strictly personal preference in music I guess. But his shows are so wild (literally) to me. His choices about sexuality, and the zany format seem like the ones I expect from the high school kids I taught. They're interesting in that kids are growing, trying out new ideas, new forms of expression. What bewilders me is how this expresses integral. All I can make out is that integral includes everything, all levels of maturity. So I'm not offended, but it seems like a waste to me. Since this is an integral group, and Stuart is part of it, it must be just me not “getting it”. I want to open to it all. Help, please.

I remember Stuart Davis saying in one of the dialogues with Ken that in terms of his music, he sees the entire body of work as being an integral work, not individual songs.  A lot of his work is expressing various aspects of shadow - for example, consider the song “Wizard” -

Down in the green room
somebody's moanin'
A couple a' groupies
are makin' a movie
Your manager warned you
that women are evil
I guess he forgot that
you worship the Devil

Down, down, down in the dungeon
Dance, dance, dance with the daggers
Blow another bubble
Shiver for Wizard
La, la, la
Wizard of Wasn't
Moan, moan mother fucker
beg, beg, you dumb bastard
Dig it
Lick a little trickle
from the ick-suck-sicle
La, la, la
Wizard of Isn't

All of the ogres
are havin' an orgy
they're pluckin' the feathers
off a' the Angels
We battle our boredom
by building a kingdom
and suckin' some stardom
through a crack in a condom

(Chorus)

Why, Why do you hate me?
Why, I'm not the things I do
Jesus, Jesus loves me
You should find a way to love me too
I'm just like you
I just need love
can't we be friends?
Fuck off, sucker

You think love'll kill me?
Love built me
You wouldn't know love
if it sprouted horns and
spit shit in your face
I am love
I throw you down stairs
I whip the hurt out
I push the pus out
I got a tongue'll knock your teeth out
bend over, you new age pussy
siphon all the fear outta the phallus
pullin' all the pain outta the pelvis
I'm the bad ass cannibal a' this
alchemical carnival I'm stuffin' babies
into catapaults to bomb the cathedrals
I'm kickin' all you camels through the
eye of the needle I am love I am love

~~~~~~~~~~~~

On the other hand, he has songs that are very deep and meaningful, like “Easter” which I quoted a few posts back.  As for “The Stuart Davis Show” in particular, I don't find it personally very entertaining or appealing, although I've just browsed a few episodes so far and plan to give it another shot at some point; but I think that aspect is designed to appeal to the young 'uns, hence all the juvenile sexual humor and such.  It seems to be aimed at twentysomethings with integral/spiritual tendencies.  Integral Naked as a whole seems slanted in that direction, actually, whereas some of the newer apects of the Multiplex - I'm thinking particularly of Integral Spiritual Center - seem designed to appeal to a more mature audience.  I like the idea of different modes of presentation, and that approach does seem very integral to me.

When you ask “how does this express integral?”  I would just say, it's just one way of embedding/expressing integral information and perspectives to appeal to a particular audience.  Deeper truths and higher ethics are part of that material - I encourage you to read his blog entry Sex Secrets and the Ethics of Promiscuity Pre-Dharma Surrender as an example.  As for his shows, I find them hugely entertaining, and that kind of “shocking” sexual humor is a big part of that.  In the first show I saw, the first thing he said was, “Anal sex with robots is the new tantra.  And the great thing is, it's not cheating, because they have no interiors!”

Also check out Stuart Davis responds to his critics, which I consider one of the funniest things he's ever done.

spirals,
arthur

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Jan 23, 2007, 7:54 PM:

 

“Working with Genpo Roshi, the koan 'reality has no opposite' has morphed into 'love has no opposite' for me. That became my soul's riddle. Hate is not the opposite of love. Fear is not the opposite of love. Evil is not the opposite of love. Love has no doctrine, no myth. It's not here to comfort us or punish us. It has no qualities, but it's present in all the qualities – go figure.


“So how does religion fit in? The word 'religion' comes from the Latin 'religione,' which means 'rejoin' or 'reconnect.' Whatever rejoins us, reconnects us, is literally religion. If love had an opposite, it would be scientology. But it doesn't! No voice, no view is the opposite of love. Each and every perspective has the power to wake us up, put us in direct experience of love.” - Stuart Davis, Love Has No Opposite, chapter one

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Mar 6, 2007, 9:18 PM:

 

In another thread, Lizalicious brought this great Stuart Davis Blog Entry to my attention:

dirty purity

song of the day: autumn leaves / Benny Golson version
word of the day: cullion 1, a testicle 2, a base despicable person 3, an orchid

Darlings! How are you? It's a splendid day, here's a toast wishing you and yours a healthy semblence today. Isn't the word “cullion” curious? I love a word that has such disparate definitions, An Orchid or a testicle, or an asshole. You pick, cuz with “cullion” you get it all. I also have to mention here that the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary is the only one with two shits in the crowded field of dictionaries. None of the other dictionaries even listed “testicle” as one of the definitions of cullion, and their etymologies always suck. The Shorter Oxford (two volumes) is, in my experience (and I've snooped around a lot over the years) the only dictionary you need once you get it. I got mine for under $100 like ten years ago, you can still get it all this time later for $96.00. It has never disappointed- gives one a sense of the stunning depth of this language, a half million entries in the Shorter Oxford. That's the SHORTER Oxford. You can get the Complete 20 Volume Oxford English Dictionary for about $900, or if you're a big shot, go for the special >Blue Leather Edition of all 20 Volumes, it's only $5,000.

I've been writing new songs of late, wrote one yesterday called 'Dirty Purity'. It's really quite peculiar the way inspiration works. A while back I had a conversation with Ottmar Leibert, and one of the things he said that I loved and has stuck with me was something like 'there's no such thing as purity, all purity is polluted, absolute purity is an illusion'. That's not a quote, but was the direction of what he said. I really loved it. It's so true, and even the illusion of total purity (racial, theological, philosophical, cultural) is a symptom of a pathological absolutism, it is actually a corruption, distortion, or toxicity. The natural tendency of things, whether on a Cosmic, human, or sub-atomic scale, is to intermingle and entwine in an inextricable weave of all four quadrants. Not only is it impossible to completely isolate or insulate an occasion, to do so results in sickness and imbalance. A closed system is either dead or dying. This doens't just apply to exteriors (matter, physical objects, bodies, planets, molecules, etc) but to interiors as well (thought, emotion, psyche, spirit, etc). The individuality of a discrete entity is only possible and only sustained through an infinite set of relationships. Even the discrete entity itself, the Whole (let's say a human being) is comprised entirely of interdependent parts (atoms in relation, molecules in relation, individuated microbioted life forms in relations, colonies of microbiotic life forms working in concert, and so on, as well as with the mind, emotion, and soul, emerging from and always abiding in the context of the collective, respirating the atmospheric conditions of its culture and intersubjective space) Ottmar's thought reminded me of what Vidyuddeva says about clarity and confusion -we think there can only be clarity if there is the total eradication of confusion, but that is confusion. Both of these sentiments fall right in line with sense of things as a human. When we really dig in, and see things just as they are, not as we wish them to be in terms of our categories, “pure” and “dirty”, “good” and “evil” do not ultimately remain. They're part of the flux. I know you may be saying “But aren't the four quadrants nothing but categories, isn't the integral model just a very sophisticated map?” Yes, it is. The crucial difference that makes the Integral Map unique is that it is a map that asks you to move beyond the maps. It points at all sorts of things, inside, outside, up, down- but it always comes back to saying that you should actually conduct the experiment. Cognitive apprehension is useful, and is part of the game, but it's important to go beyond that. And Integral continually begs us to not take its word for anything, to not simply convert all the data into yet another elaborate system of parsing reality into bite-sized chunks. It wants us to use the map to get beyond the maps, and once we've done that, use them as convenient, effective tools when appropriate. Nobody denies integral is just a map, it's just the best map I personally know of, and it's precisely because of this unusual facet. Anywya, after Ottmar and I had chatted on the phone, he sent me this Nine Inch Nails album (I like it) and that got me in sort of gritty mood musically, and yesterday I was ruminating in my heart on this false dichotomy of pure / polluted, good / evil, and then I laughed when I started chanting “Dirty Purity”. I knew there was a song there, your basic Tantric pop song. I also had a feeling that I wanted to write a simple song with a charge. I get wary of my over-intellectualizing in songs sometimes, it has its place, but only sometimes. It's got to resonate with the gut first. Because of that, before I started writing the song, I decided the chorus could only be two words, 'dirty purity'. I could write verses and stuff, but I wanted the chorus to be simple guts and drive.

The first thing that came up for me when I started writing this song was my wife. To me she is the living embodiment of 'dirty purity', not because of some perversion or ascetism, but because she really gets the complementary, intimate relationship between the muck and grit of incarnation, and how that is truly the Light, the Ecstatic Radiance of Love, and that only by LIVING that truth in the World does the realization grow into the spontaneous expression. it's not merely cognitive for her. my wife has taught me by living example how baby shit in a diaper is the divine light of God. she doesn't talk talk talk yap yap yap all goddamn day about God, Buddha, spirituality like all the blah blah blahs (hey, like what i'm doing right now!), she GETS it intellectually just fine, but that's 2% of the practice. 98% is living as that love in the World, not to show off, not to “evolve” for your own sake. so my wife has been my biggest inspiration, because each day with her and our daughter, i'm face to face with someone who is really going way beyond all the maps, dropping all the philosophical models, and demanding that the practice include everything, especially house cleaning, screaming babies, sleep deprivation, yard work, and not as a sacrifice, as a privilege and celebration of the Mystery. and that is what hit me as Dirty Purity. you get in the fucking trenches of love. for me, that is only possible because i live with a Dakini. left to my own pathetic devices and inclinations, i would resort to the big lie of 'purity'. it's a disease that's not uncommon to Zen practitioners, especially men. we try to live in the world without the messy entanglements of relationships and the messy, ridiculous challenges they bring every day. we don't want to be encumbered, embarrassed, and anchored on Earth where there is all sorts of shitty puzzles banging on your heart and head every day, so we ensconce ourselves in a virtual “cave” and stare at the fucking wall. we say it's for the sake of all beings everywhere, we talk a perfect game of loving and dying for the sake of the Whole, but it's a fucking bypass. It's the oldest trick in the transpersonal book. The last and most dangerous disguise the ego appropriates is the Trans-Egoic. And this is why I love Genpo. He works with the ego, not endlessly trying to destroy it. Cuz you know what? You can't. Fucking forget about Ramana Maharshi, he's literally one in 6 Billion. As long as there is a body that's alive, there is an ego, and forever and a day now Zen and other traditions have sought to kill the ego. You can't kill it. It will ultimately retreat to the most inner recesses of the soul itself and stay there, until the next fucking incarnation, blocking, occluding, and scrambling the important work that might otherwise be occuring in the authentic, real trans-personal domains of our Self. As with everything, it is not an either / or, this / that binary reality. It is the messy miracle of existence which is both the reality of the fucked up, grasping cluthing ego, AND the even more real existence of an awareness which is beyond that, which is not defined or characterized by its impermanent (and miraculous) qualities or characteristics. That is dirty purity to me, and that is what I see my wife unfolding every day with our daughter, our life, and the struggles of being awake in the constant, ferocious white noise of the World and the Human mind. This is why Genpo has an entirely revolutionary approach for a Zen teacher. He STARTS with the ego. He knocks on the front door of the house, and when the ego answers the door (as it always does, even when it's not the ego answering the door, it's STILL the ego answering the door, dressed up as some non-egoic costume called “the soul” or the “trans-temporal self” or whatever) Genpo says “Hi.” the ego says “Hi”. then, Genpo starts to ask a few questions, with respect and dignity, simply ASKING the ego if we can come into the house through the front door, and walk around a bit. can we have the ego's permission to talk to some of the other aspects of self? the answer is always yes. if you just ASK the ego, it will allow you access to the other parts of self, moving through deeper and deeper aspects of self until finally entrance is gained to Big Heart and Big Mind, the Self which unfolds and expresses as all the other smaller selves, but is not any one of them.

it sounds simple, doesn't it? because it is. but it's entirely radical. Zen, and most esoteric traditions, have long regarded the ego as the enemy, as that which must be destroyed and annihilated before there can be awakening, before there can be realization. but to paraphrase Vid, seeking clarity by thinking we have to obliterate all confusion is just confusion. “the worst kind of non-duality is the non-duality that thinks it's better than non-non-duality”. (i thought i heard Genpo say that once, but then i asked him and he said he didn't say it, so i don't know where i got it, maybe Vid said it?)

to me, dirty purity is the way my wife shows up in the World, it's the way Genpo works with the human condition, it's the way Vid teaches about confusion and clarity, and it's what ottmar shared with me. i hate sharing lyrics without music, because it's like watching a movie with no sound, but since i've talked about this song so much today, what the hell.

Dirty Purity

I'm in love
with the homeless girl
who carved a cave
into the World
She crawled out
all covered in blood
and dripped red seeds
into the mud
Filthy deity

Shut up, shut up
Shut up already
with the temple talk
you're freaking me out

What up, what up
What up with the six-limbed Siren
beating it out
of every part of me

Dirty purity
Dirty purity

At first I bought it all
And then I fought it all
Next I forgot it all
But I'm not done
Not at all
With cryptic clarity

Would I, would I
Would I scatter if
I just admit
I'm already dead

Should it, should it
Should it matter if
my mind won't fit
back in my head
friction is sanity is

Dirty purity
Dirty purity

Nothing moves
something switches
Question marks
and crucifixes

Odd how it was
only eyelids
kept me blinded
from the light
in open obscurity

Dirty purity
Dirty purity

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Mar 13, 2007, 11:59 AM:

 

Check out this awesome article Stuart wrote on the Secret:

The Secret: The Spirituality of Narcissism

  Nomali : IntegralSpiritualChocolate

Re: Stuart Davis

Nomali said Mar 14, 2007, 10:26 PM:

 

also,
you gotta luuuuv someone who says “nomz is the bomz!!”

;-)

  Durwin : Radical dad

Re: Stuart Davis

Durwin said Mar 15, 2007, 9:28 PM:

 

Just bought and downloaded my first Stuart Davis CD this week – What – so might have something to chime in about soon…thanks for the list of movies, too!
Durwin

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Mar 19, 2007, 12:26 PM:

 

Nomali: true dat! 

Durwin: glad to hear you've aquired what I consider to be Stu's best album to date, which is saying something.

Here's a delicious tidbit from Ken Wibler's [hey, I've gotta leave in that typo] blog:

Another Face of Stuart Davis
November 24, 2006 19:51

~posted by Clint

You know Stuart Davis the musician. You have seen Stuart Davis on Stu Cam and now on The Stuart Davis Show. You may have seen his recently released Audio Book or heard a rumor that he has a print book in the works, but did you know Stuart Davis was also a painter?

Stuart's paintings feature poems in his constructed language IS, an assortment of figures on fire and reflecting light and dozens of crows painted on paper, wood, and canvas, in watercolor, ink, oil, pencil, acrylic, marker, pen, blood, tears, and piss. Here are a few from a recent series:


Trikaya




Two Crows




Three Crows




Sheho 2




Self Portrait


To see the rest of Stuart's paintings, visit his Flickr site.



Why does he paint so many crows? Stu posted this on his blog last month…

I'm reluctant to be honest about how deeply crows have become woven into the fabric of my being, because it's going to seem weird. I feel them, I would say, 80% of my waking and dreaming life now. I dream of them nearly every night, for weeks now. They are intense, beautiful, simple dreams.

I cannot explain why, one day at the age of 35 I woke up and felt possessed by crows, and began painting them. I wasn't even a painter. But they did not want music, or poetry, or phototgraphy. They demanded to be painted. Hundreds of them. For days, then weeks. I feel disjointed when I have to do something besides paint or study crows.

If I am taking out the trash, I am painting crows in my head. Making coffee? Painting crows. Running errands at the bank? Painting crows. Crows on paper, wood, canvas, in watercolor, ink, oil, pencil, acrylic, marker, pen, blood, tears, piss. Crows on copper (my next series). Sitting, flying, scavenging. I thought it would pass, but it has morphed and deepened. Driving, I look for them in the sky. Walking I search trees. At home I google them. When I see them, a rush of adrenaline. Then, I wait and want to see them again.

I am slightly embarrassed, in fact, to admit what incredible exhileration I feel every time I see a crow now. They take my breath away. When I first saw the murder in my back yard -after the first three days of painting them- it scared Light into me. It was such a stunning, unmistakable synchronicity that it shocked my soul into a bizarre recognition.

And that is the puzzle.

I cannot relate verbally what transpired. It doesn't slide into signifiers. I mean, I try, but… Like for starters, just what the FUCK is going on when you don't see crows, or think about crows for years (since that one, five years ago, in a blizzard), and then one morning you wake up and have to paint them, exorcise them, respire their enigmatic ¿Whatness, with no idea why? Painted and painted, twelve, thirteen hours a day. Then, on the third day I walk out of my studio, and there is a murder of them in my tree, right over the studio? CROWS? At THAT moment? I have never seen a crow in my yard, or in my town.

That moment cracked a mirror I had mistaken for a window.

Since then, they've been back -never as a murder- only in singles. I have followed one around my town for a half hour in my pajamas. Now I see them often. They are stalking me, I swear to God. Wherever I go, they're around. I have read dozens of sources, poetic, scientific. I asked my Zen teacher to explain to me just what is going on with these crows, I mean they're an old central Zen symbol, so a Zen Master must know…

“I don't know shit about that.”

That's a quote.

If I am really honest I would tell you I am pregnant. Or possessed. Enveloped, subsumed, hypnotized in a recognition I can't articulate. It has a hold on my heart, it hurts to turn away from it, emotionally or spiritually. I'm not *thinking* about them. They have nested in my belly, not my head. They're in me, I'm in them, and when they look at me (in dreams they often now get very close to my face and just look in my eyes, and it is ELECTRIC and vulnerable and exposing) I think I can say this much:

The murder that first came into my yard, the dozen on that third day of painting, they are my guides, my family. I mean that literally, somehow THOSE crows, on THAT day, were messengers of a sort. The Family Secret. Agents of Communion. See, I don't like writing this, cuz I it sounds ridiculous, and “purple” and deluded. But listen, I painted those fucking things for three days, for no reason out of nothing. My wife thought I was going crow-crazy. Then they SHOWED UP, in my yard, where they'd never been before. The recognition shook me. Those crows screamed THIS IS NO COINCIDENCE, SEE? WE ARE HERE! I still can't believe it. But I can't deny it.

Now all I want to do is be present to them, as one of them, and delve the Family Secret. What do these guides usher? I'm almost embarrassed to admit how open my Heart is to them, how deeply and sincerely I love them, without knowing why or even what it is.

But not as embarrassed as I am when they look into me, and show me how I idolize decoys, exalt delusions.

Black eyes blink, silken hoods tilt quizzically.

Later my Zen teacher Genpo Roshi admitted he did know something about them. “They are part of your Shiho ceremony. But it hasn't happened. And I don't know when it will happen, but they were there when it happened, spiritually.”

I know they are my family. They know me, and found me, and came at a time when I was broken. They are here now, and will be with me when I die, and without them I would be lost and listless. Biding the black, inscrutable Mystery. In both worlds at once, straddling cycles of birth and death without effort or sense of attainment. Wise, inventive, Paradoxical sense of humor.

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Jun 29, 2007, 9:42 AM:

 

Drown is one of my favorite Stuart Davis songs.  Occasionally it haunts me.  I try not to take this personally.  :p  (from album “Self Titled” 2001)

I'd like to find the fucker who left us afloat
Who pushed us over and took in the boat?
Soup of humans, we're all eating waves
everyone struggles and no one is saved

It makes me thirsty, this salt I'm drinking
my head is bursting but I won't stop thinking
All I've got is what I know
I will not be food for the beast below

Gravity
Love is under me
Endless water, endless water
Gravity
Love is under me
Endless water, endless water

This body won't drop
love is a plank I won't walk off
Look below, where is the joy?
If you go too deep, it's an endless void

But my weight is too much to hold
my arms are ready to fold
Just beneath me, stillness is there
as I thrash the water and gasp for air

Gravity
[Drown Lyrics on http://www.lyricsmania.com]
Love is under me
Endless water, endless water
Gravity
Love is under me
Endless water, endless water
Gravity
Love is under me

So why am I thrashing around?
There's nothing to fear, I'm ready to drown

Nothing's gonna change
I've always been water
Nothing's gonna change
I've always been water
Nothing's gonna change
I've always been
Drowning
Love is under me
Drowning
Love is over me
Drowning
Love is under me
Drowning
Love is over me
Nothing's gonna change
I've always been water
Everything is water

~~~~~

  Colin : Transfigurine

Re: Stuart Davis

Colin said Jun 29, 2007, 10:24 AM:

 

Mmm. These first verses really resonated:

I'd like to find the fucker who left us afloat
Who pushed us over and took in the boat?
Soup of humans, we're all eating waves
everyone struggles and no one is saved

It makes me thirsty, this salt I'm drinking
my head is bursting but I won't stop thinking
All I've got is what I know
I will not be food for the beast below

As I've said to you personally recently, Arthur, I have had emotithoughts arise that give me what seems to be very clear insight into human nature and religious yearning. Where's that fucker that left us afloat? Sometimes I am struck by the outright depravity of humanity. We are monsters on some level. And we are angels, too. How the fuck did we get here? Many times in the last year, I have transcendent moments when I look at my interiors and then apparent exteriors and I just sit in wonder and awe. How the fuck did this happen? Sacred and profane all rolled into one cosmic spliff of delusion and transcendence.

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Jun 29, 2007, 10:45 PM:

 

Heh, Colin - love it, particularly the last line: Sacred and profane all rolled into one cosmic spliff of delusion and transcendence

Here's a recent interview with Stuart Davis from One Mind Village:

~~~~~

What was your spiritual practice prior to Zen?  When did you find Zen?  I've heard you say that
Zen “just fit you”.  Why do you think it was such a cozy fit?

Before Zen, mostly the hedonistic indulgence of the rock 'n roll lifestyle.  After Zen, the puritanical
dissociation from my shadow that so often comes with the honeymoon period of Zen, or any other
interior practice.  The last few years, I feel the two starting to integrate.  But it's slow. And messy.  And
miraculous.  Zen was a fit for me because in my experience it's the most radical about not giving you
something to cling to.  It's not a religion.  It's not a philosophy.  It can include  religion and philosophy,
but Zen is not religion or philosophy, in my experience.  And it takes whatever you clutch as “it” and
dissolves that too.  What's left when Great Doubt has annihilated it all?  Zen also has a good funny bone.  
Doesn't take itself to seriously, which I really like.  I like humor as a vehicle for awakening.


Did Zen expedite your state AND stage growth?

Yes and no.  I think the first few years of Zen, I just converted my rock 'n roll state-chasing (drugs, sex,
etc) into meditation.  Then I was a bliss-state chaser, and a subtle state-chaser, and I became fixated on
those.  So I did get access to them, but they came and went like anything else.  So, I increased access to
states, but also clutched them.  Then, I got married, had kids, and my family life really exposed my
limitations in terms of stages.  I had a lot of shadow stuff going on, and a pretty low center of gravity in
some ways, from a decade in rock 'n.  Never had a boss, or accountability to anyone.  Then I got a wife,
two kids, and a teacher (Genpo Roshi) and suddenly it became painfully obviously what a self-absorbed
asshole I was (am).  Integrating that shadow stuff, and moving the center of gravity up and outward is a
slow process, and you can't just meditate.  Meditation doesn't necessarily equal developing through
stages, but I think combined with relationships, commitment to shadow work, etc, it helps a lot.


Have you practiced other meditative techniques besides Zazen?

Some.  Sufi Dhikr, Contemplative prayer.  But mostly Zazen.


Were you consistently meditating before you found Wilber's work, specifically the Aha moment
of learning about states and stages?  Will you describe a bit about how your interpretations of
states changed after you learned of more advanced stages of interpretation?

My drummer was a Zen monk, and he taught me how to meditate a few months before I discovered
ken's stuff.  After I read Sex, Ecology, Spirituality by Ken Wilber, it really blew the lid off my life, and I
spent about a year just assembling myself again.  It became so clear how partial I'd been, how chronic
the inclination to take one thing, one part of me, one method, one practice, and then make it “THE”
thing. Like you can just meditate.  Or just do drugs.  Or just have sex, or read, or go to therapy, etc, and
that one thing will do it. Ken's work really challenged me toward being a more whole human being, and I
am still living with that question in new ways each day.  It's quite a koan, becoming an Agent of the
Mystery.


What's it like to be more fully enlightened than Sakyamuni himself?

Effortless.


I know your teacher, Genpo Roshi, has developed a technique called Big Mind.  Instead of killing
the ego as in traditional Buddhism, he teaches one to recognize different aspects of the ego and
then embrace or integrate them.  I've heard you call this the “Fourth Turning of the Wheel.”  
Could you speak a little more about this?  Why do you think this is happening in “the Western
world”?  In your opinion what significance could this discovery have on the western world and
Zen in general?

I call it that, “the fourth turning of the wheel”, but I'm not sure Genpo does.  He may, he may not, but in
general I do think that's what's occurring in the West, a fourth turning.  The fourth turning is Integral.  
The first three vehicles Hinayana, Mahayana, and Vajrayana each expanded and increased orders of
whole-ness in practice and realization.  I feel Integral is the fourth turning of  the wheel, (Integral-yana?),
and it rests on the shoulders of Ken Wilber, Genpo Roshi, Patrick Sweeney, Father Thomas Keating,
Andrew Cohen, Swami Sally, and literally thousands of others who are actively developing an integral
approach to awakening in the modern world.  Once you get what “integral” means in LIFE, in the human
condition (not just as a theory) it becomes very difficult to deny how powerful and useful it is to increase
our awakening, deepen our capacity to authentically love.

It isn't enough anymore, to just meditate and “wake up”.  We have all of these important distinctions,
unique insights from the West, that have improved how we play the Game of Being.  For starters, the
simple distinction between states and stages.  You have an enlightenment experience, it may last minutes,
or days, or years.  But that is NOT the same thing as moving the center of gravity (stage) of self upward
and outward.  If you're not careful, and you just meditate, you became someone adept in state-access
(horizontal) with a low center of gravity.  It's very common, even (or especially) in Zen, Shambhala, and
the traditions with advanced practices of interiority.  Meditating won't integrate your shadow.  That's
how you get someone who knows they have aids still having sex with students, which happened in
Buddhism right here in Boulder.  That's how you get new age types saying no one has the right to judge
anyone else about “where they're at”.  Really?  I can't judge a loving mother to be better than a crack
head who beats her kids?  Actual development is a bitch, but it's really what is required for us -as
humans- to navigate through this bottle-neck period.  Plus, there's just no getting around the fact that
Integral allows us to include more.  That means we have even more love, even more awakened
awareness, more intimacy -and it is deeper. Why would we settle for less?  How can we settle for less?  
That's what I think the fourth turning of the wheel is about.  Vertical and horizontal access to love.  
Strong distinctions between states and stages, which will mean less confusion and suffering.  And so on.


Zen has a tradition called “crazy wisdom”.  Do you consider yourself to be part of this lineage?

The crazy part, yes.


When did you first find Wilber?  Did it instantly resonate with you?

I found him, I think, in 1995.  I instantly resonated, yes.  The first book changed my life.


Since we all MUST progress through the entire spectrum of consciousness, I will assume you had
a “green” period in your life.  Will you tell us a bit about that?  How much longer do you think it
would have taken you to evolve past green if you hadn't found Wilber's work?  Or were you
already post-green before finding Wilber?

I had a very green period.  I wrote all sorts of environmental songs, deconstructed everything, was very
pious about it all.  But I think it's crucial to note I'm still GREEN and want to be!  It's not like you go
through a level of development, then are done with it.  I very much want to, and need to include every
dimension and altitude of ME that I've ever accessed.  That includes pre-conventionol stuff (magic,
egoic, etc), conventional (mythic, rational), and post-conventional (green, integral, etc).  I need and want
access to all of them. There's a real tendency toward “anti-green” that pops up in Integral. I have very
much been guilt of it as well.  It's understandable, as development works through

A, identification
B, dis-identification
C, integration

right now, a lot of us are dis-identifying with Green, and that's a good sign.  But we will of course need
to integrate it, or we will have a nasty shadow thing going on.  So, I want to be clear I love the green
part of me, and the green part of the culture, etc.  It is riddled with confusion and problems, but those
problems are better ones then say, they have in Somalia.


When you were nested in your “green” phase do you think you would have instantly recognized
the egoic nature of the Secret?

Yes.  Because the secret is actually a Purple manifesto for Red (using spiral dynamics) devils.  It uses
straightforward magical thinking to lure the ego into the Odyssey of Acquisition.


Why do you think the Secret is resonating so deeply with many Americans at this time?  Is it
just because Oprah endorses it?  Or is there a deeper underlying reason pertaining to stages of
consciousness?  Or both?

For the same reason pornography is the most popular thing on the web.  Immediate gratification of the
lowest common denominator.  The Secret begins with a partial truth -our thoughts influence reality- and
then inflates it to a lie (our thoughts create reality).  It's Harry Potter for narcissists.  See my blog for a
detailed description of the danger in this.



Do you worry that “green” levels of consciousness and below will find Episode 7 of the Stuart
Davis Show demeaning?  You give them hell Stuart.  Or am I just being “green” myself by
worrying about feelings?

Well, remember, I'm giving myself hell too.  Those purple, red, blue, orange, and green altitudes are ME.  
I really do have an insanely ego-maniacal dimension.  I really do have a sensitive green part.  I have a
purple layer.  And so on.  But I also have a subject that can see them, and realize what their assets are,
and what their liabilities may be.  Personally, I think it's funny.  I have fallen for these kinds of things
over and over.  Can I laugh at myself?  Can I laugh at the different altitudes of myself and still love them?

But my deepest loyalty is to Reality, not to a particular aspect of it.  So, I believe in the ruthless approach
to comedy, because it's the quickest path to clarity, truth, awakening, etc.  I don't think we can be in the
business of merely protecting people's feelings, at the expense of Reality.  I don't believe in mean spirited
assassinations either, but if we sat around not trying to piss anyone off, we'd be stuck.  On a good day,
I'll admit I'm an egomaniac with a lot of shadow, and try to work with it, and I will need a lot of help
(wife,
kids, friends, community).  I am every altitude, and I want access to them all, but I also want to make
choices and distinctions.  What is more inclusive?  I want to be able to pick the pebbles out of my rice.
The Secret is almost all pebbles, very little rice.


Do you think the Secret could resonate equally as strongly in “the Eastern world”?  Or is this
strictly a western cultural phenomenon?

I think it would resonate anywhere you have people with egos, tempted by Kosmic Bypass.  That's most
of us.  That's not necessarily unique to the West, although we seem to have taken it to a degree that's
unusual.  Prosperity in the information age comes with new riddles, this is one of them.


Describe the Secret in an original Stuart Davis haiku.

Shiny pebbles
Mixed with rice
Teething Buddhas


If a person finds Wilber's work while nesting in the “orange” stage, is it possible to SKIP the
“green” stage all together and immediately begin operating with Integral or “turquoise” soft-
ware?

Mmm.  I don't know.  I've heard some say Orange and Green are parallel altitudes, but I wouldn't know.  
I think the big question is the difference between “cognitive” access and a person's actual center of
gravity.  I think it's quite easy for many to get this stuff intellectually,  but it's another thing to work the
whole human being.  Think of mixing board with all those faders.  You can slide one channel up to “10”
and the vocal gets really loud, but then the mix is out of whack. You need to be able to work all the
faders.  Cognition is good, Ken always says it's necessary but not sufficient, and I think that's true.


Please describe the strange connection between “green” and “red” levels of consciousness.  Why
do you believe they are so compatible?

Green is pluralistic.  It wants everything equal.  “Don't judge, don't marginalize”. It's perfect for Red,
because then it can do what it wants without being judged or held accountable.  When you get green
saying “who are WE to judge another person's journey, who are we to judge someone's PROCESS?”
then you get Red going “cool. Don't judge me, I'm going Caligula on your ass.”



Pretending Wilber and Integral didn't exist, how else can one bridge the gap between “green”
levels of consciousness and a more integral embrace?

It's a good question.  Cuz I think people often equate Wilber with Integral, but it's just not the case.  He's
the Bodhisattva of Integral for sure, but he's simply describing and cultivating a feature of humanity, not
inventing it.  So, you don't have to have Wilber to go Integral, in my opinion it's just incredibly helpful to
study his stuff, because it's the most exhaustive and brilliant resource currently.

Generally though, I feel you could bridge Green to a more Integral embrace by acquainting it with its
own brilliance and its limitations.  It's been so wonderful in moving us toward pluralism.  It has increased
our sensitivity toward each other (race, gender, etc), the plight of our species in relation to our
biosphere, and has given us a boon of cultural creatives that are visionaries in many regards.  But it's
pathologies and limitations are real.  It's incapacity to make critical value judgements, retro-romantic
notions of a “return” to
some Edenic version of environmentalism, enthusiastic embrace of narcissistic regression (The Secret),
ridiculous appropriation of quantum mechanics (What the Bleep), have resulted in paralysis at time
we simply cannot afford to luxuriate in such confusion.  If we take a sober look at both of those -good
and bad- I think our dynamic nature (evolutionary impulse) is greater than the stasis (green quagmire).

We've made it through a lot.  Magic, mythic, rational, pluralistic altitudes have emerged within us, and
now Integral Awareness is calling us.  It's not a theory, a philosophy, it's a dimension of us, that can
open a whole new mode of Love on Earth.  Not a solution to all our problems, but better problems.  Not
the end of trouble, but better trouble.


What is your opinion of Oprah?

I love Oprah.  Despite my somewhat stern blog about The Secret and the way she's endorsed it, I think
Oprah has done an immeasurable amount of good for the World, and she is one of my heroes.  I watch
her all the time, and I wish we had many more like her.


List your 3 favorite “green” teachers.

Oprah, Bjork, Ken Wilber.   Oprah is obvious.  She's a planetary lightening rod for so much of the best
of Green.  Bjork to me exemplifies the very best artistic genius in the post-modern sense. Ken Wilber has
done more than anyone I know to lovingly (tough love, true) encourage green to a greater, wider
embrace of their own humanity.  Ken has taken a very difficult task on, by being willing to be un-popular
with some of the green in order to manifest something more whole and enduring for all of humanity in
the long run.  Say what you will, Ken has deeply, profoundly engaged green in a way that few could, and
even fewer would be willing to, and it is precisely because he sees and expects even more from them.  If
he didn't love them, didn't give a shit, he would just dismiss them.  But MOST importantly, Ken IS
green.  So am I.  These are altitudes within each of us, and we need them, we continue to nurture and
include them, even after the radius has expanded beyond them.


My friend Paul Lonely quoted Ken the other day:  “Partiality is the new sin.”  Do you agree?  If
so, how do you balance “rock star” Stuart and “monk” Stuart?  There seems to be a funny line
to play with.  Does it ever get confusing for you?  Do you think there are extremes of embracing
one side more than the other?

I do agree with that.  It does get confusing to me.  But as my friend Vidyuddeva says, “People think
there's confusion, and there's clarity, and that to have clarity you have to get rid of confusion.  But that's
a confusion.  There's clarity, and there's confusion.  That's fine.”


In your audio book there is a chapter on marriage called “open marriage open wound”.  Have
your ideas of relationships changed as you've “climbed the ladder” or experienced deeper levels
of consciousness?

Very much.  Open Marriage, Open Wound has generated an incredible amount of reaction.  I've been
surprised by how many people are contending with this riddle.  Basically, I think that like anything,
the institution of marriage is evolving.  Strict monogamy is bound to be (in some way) the vestigial organ
of the inter-subjective domain. But, I really don't know what will come in its place, or what romantic
/ marriage relationships will eventually be like, in the main-stream sense.  I think it's pretty freaking
obvious that our monogamous institution of marriage is a bit of a joke.  We just don't work that way,
increasingly so.  But it's a messy, tricky gig.  I am continuing to live with this puzzle, and would not
want to offer advice or anything to bold.



Please describe the differences between horizontal and vertical enlightenment.

Briefly, horizontal is access to states.  Vertical is the developmental center of gravity.  I can have a
horizontal state-experience of What Is,  and it doesn't necessarily mean my center of gravity will move.  
I will interpret the horizontal state experience from whatever vertical altitude (center of gravity) I am
anchored in.  I could also have a very high, or deep, or expansive vertical center of gravity, and not
necessarily have a very advanced access to states (meditative, etc).  They interact, but are quite
distinct.  Double axis of “enlightenment”.  I always think of this when I see a crucifix.  I think Christ was
pinned at the Point of All Places, at the intersection of vertical and horizontal enlightenment


What is Integral Art?

That's a question I'm living.  One answer is:  What isn't Integral Art.  See my song “¿What” for details.


You, Wilber, Paul Lonely all have shaved heads.  What is the significance of this?

I look better without hair.  It's vanity.   I can't speak for Ken and Paul.


____________________________________________________

Stuart Davis - Thank you for your time, clarity and above all, LOVE!

OMV, Malena Gamboa - Editor
03/07

~~~~~

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Jul 28, 2007, 9:56 PM:

 

Check out The Stuart Davis Show - Pilot Episode on YouTube:

~~~~~

This is the pilot episode Stu hopes will land him a highfalutin Hollywood TV contract. Marci offers to let Stu sleep with groupies if he gives her another baby, Stu discovers a very odd fetish and a horrible rash, and Marci hits the jackpot of hot with a Scientologist on the block. Co-starring Marci and Aja Davis, Steve Brill, Nicole Fegley, and the Clones, this episode truly represents a new benchmark in integral enlightentainment….

~~~~~

I found it pretty funny, although I was a bit annoyed that Marci played a stereotypical brainless bimbo.
  I particularly enjoyed the arguments between the clones over Stu's polyamory aspirations.  Best of all there was NO LAUGHTRACK.  Laughtracks totally kill a TV show for me.  (The only laughtrack that ever worked for me was the Rabbits one.)  Keep the Stuart Davis show LAUGHTRACK FREE!  (The deal is, you can have laughtracks or scientologists.  You've chosen scientologists - so be it.)

spirals,
arthur

  Lauren : mammal

Re: Stuart Davis

Lauren said Jul 29, 2007, 6:00 AM:

 

Hi Arthur,

I just dropped by this thread for the first time in many months and noticed this post about Drown, one of my favorite of Stu's songs as well. A few weeks ago on the “If you could choose only one song…” thread I posted this link to a video of Drown. That thread hasn't seen much traffic so I thought I'd repost it here as well. Have you seen this? There are also links on this page to many songs from the same performance.

Best,
Lauren

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Jul 29, 2007, 11:50 AM:

 

Great, Lauren!  Thanks for the link to Drown you provided.  :)  You're right, there's a ton of other great related stuff, like Savoring Samsara - another favorite of mine, which has been known to lift me out of doldrums.  Jonah, one of my all-time favorite songs by him, is a brilliant and moving evocation of the trail of wreckage suicide leaves in the lives of loved ones left behind.   Fall Awake - yeah baby!  What a great song about spirit struggling to stay present and conscious in a cultural matrix that doesn't support it.   Nothing in Between is a beautiful song about our interconnectivity and unitive nature, a celebration of spiritual communion.  Flower of a Zero is the song that first changed my response to Stuart Davis from “damn, I want to like this guy, but his music is kinda boring” to “wow, this is a fucking great song!“  This particular clip shows a bit what his stage shows are like (but you really need to go to one to get the full experience, and a lot of people have mentioned really falling in love with his music only after seeing a live show).  Ladder is a profoundly chilling song about the glory, horror and potential of our evolutionary journey.  Rock Stars and Models is fucking hilarious.

Thanks again for bringing this stuff to our attention, Lauren.  :)

spiral out,
arthur

  Pelle : focusing

Re: Stuart Davis

Pelle said Jul 29, 2007, 12:31 PM:

 

Five different Stuart albums can be found in the Itunes Store - for those of you who prefer buying CD's online.


Pelle

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Jul 29, 2007, 2:36 PM:

 

Pelle: Five different Stuart albums can be found in the Itunes Store - for those of you who prefer buying CD's online.

~~~~~

Thanks, Pelle!  My personal favorite way to buy a Stuart Davis album is directly from him at a concert.  Hopefully it won't be too long before I get to see one of his shows again.

spirals,
arthur

  Lauren : mammal

Re: Stuart Davis

Lauren said Aug 8, 2007, 3:44 PM:

 

the actual process of evolution is not a pretty affair. it's like making sausage or laws. you don't want to know how it's actually done.

This fantabuloso insight brought to you courtesy of the subject of this thread.

I was reading a fairly recent blog post of Stu's and started to dig it, then started to REALLY dig it, then started to squeal and yelp to myself. Please, pull up a chair, settle your tushy in nice and comfortable, and join me…
Persist if the first few paragraphs don't interest you much. There's a story within a story within a story here, and it's worth waiting for the momentum to build.
and, Hail Marcy!

Here's the rest of the post:

Hollywood Blogs / Relationship

song of the day: Owner of a Lonely Heart / Yes
word of the day: Salubrious / favorable to or promoting health; healthful:

i have never been so engaged. this month i am finishing an album, a book, and a new screeplay. i wake up every day about eight a.m. meditate while my wife goes to yoga class, then i baby sit my daughters for a couple hours. work on my screenplay. my wife comes home, watches the kids, chats with me, i work on the screenplay till about noon. go to the studio. on the way there in the car, make as many phone calls as i can. check in with E, the gang. arrive at studio. work on the record all day. cut vocals, guitars, do production. in between tracking, work on my book (Sex, God, Rock 'n Roll, edited by Ken Wilber sucka, coming out on Shambhala / Random House). leave the studio, get home at nine or ten, work on screenplay again till 1am. fall asleep. repeat.

album is still going incredible. we did guitars yesterday with Dave Levita (Alanis Morisette's guitarist on Jagged Little Pill and others) who played on Twisted Mystery and Wand and turned them into hits! every song we put up, it sounds like a single. a multitude of singles on this thing.

very interesting times. i have made 13 albums in my career. this one feels completely different. not just musically, but energetically. i have reached a threshold in my work, and for the first time ever in my life, i am utterly, absolutely resolved to have a hit record. a successful record, that millions of people hear. and i'm unwilling to accept any other outcome. up until this year, i have been not only content with my role on the periphery of the industry, but actually luxuriated in it. i did not want the responsibility that came with larger success. in other words, i did not want the relationships that come with it. because the truth of it is, you can't do it alone. no artist, ever in the history of truly large-scale endeavor, ever did it alone. in reality, we can't do anything alone. make a baby, bake bread. there's no such thing as true isolation. we are interdependent beings, constitutionally. like or not, we either live in relationship or die. but there is a lot of range. from less relationship to more.

i spent the first fifteen years of my career with the least amount of relationship possible. i was single, for the most part. i never had a record label. i was extremely resistant to having any kind of manager, publicist, publisher, booking agent, because it meant relationship. i wanted to do whatever i wanted, however i wanted, with whomever i wanted. part of it was selfish, but part of it was pure too. it wasn't only that i didn't want to be beholden to others, it was also that i wanted to be radically available to the Mystery, creativity, inner realms. It took me over a decade to really sate my hunger for interior exploration. i wrote hundreds and hundreds of songs, meditated long hours, retreats, spent lots of time alone. lived alone, worked alone, travelled alone. one man show.

and the parameters of my career reflected that. i have always been fortunate to have a successful career. without any label or relationships, i still managed to sell tens of thousands of CDs by touring and so on, and that of course was only possible because of relationship. between me and the audience every night. and i have always loved that relationship. one night stands. basically having spiritual tantric sex with groups of strangers all over the country. each show is a pillow party of sorts. that was easy. anonymous, but not cheap or shallow. there is actually very deep connections and vulnerabilty in the concert event, but its fleeting, which makes it palatable to someone with an allergic reaction to sustained intimacy (the old me).

and then i met my wife. and who knows why, but sometimes you meet the exception to the Rule, and all bets are off. i don't think i'll ever know why, but my wife is the person who is able to get me to transcend my own nature. she has a gift, i guess. for example, i was always categorically against having kids. it was my one non-negotiable with women. i would never, ever have children in this life time. i ended relationships with two women i loved because of it. it was just not going to happen, period. then i kissed my wife one night, and -sounds ridiculous but its true- i realized that i didn't know who i was. it was as though the “me” that categorically refused to have children was actually a decoy. there was another me, or another level of me, that woke up when she kissed me. that self said “ok, we'll take it from here” and i realized not only would i be a father, but it was already DONE. in some strange way, i already knew my daughter(s). and a couple months later, i was married. and a couple months later we were pregnant. and people looked at me and were like “who ARE you? what have you done with Stuart?” and that was about right, because the old me, while still present, was being absorbed into a new identity, a new self. one difference in the new guy was relationship. the new self was actually entering into a relationship, to stay. relationship with wife, relationship with daughter. the old self fucking HATED it. screamed, kicked, freaked out. the new self watched and said “do what you gotta do. but we're staying.” and i never would have found that new self, the one that was willing to go into relationship, if it were not for my wife. it is like she knows the code. a code that night even *I* know. i look at the locks over my heart, and sigh “oh, this thing is fucking BOLTED. we're screwed. it will never open. its welded SHUT.” and it's true. until she shows up, and looks at it, and goes “oh, you just do *this* silly!” and with one mysterious touch, it's all gone. no lock, no nothing. like it was never there.

maybe that's what a soul mate is. maybe that's what true love is, or what, i don't know. but once we were married, and had a kid, then another, i found myself in a very very intimate relationship with not one, but three females. my wife and two daughters. and pretty soon they were doing that magic stuff on all different parts of me. opening this, dissolving that, building muscle, melting scars. they began to remake me, into an ever-more recognizable Me. as it goes along, i feel a more authentic self coming more to the fore. it's a resting. a simple abiding, made possible by allowing, submitting to some (sometimes) incredibly uncomfortable adjustments. but remember, even bliss can be uncomfortable if you're not acclimated to the clarity of its atmosphere. this morning i spent two hours with a screaming baby. it was not comfortable. but it was not as excruciating as three years ago, when my first daughter had cholic for six months, and i would hold her screaming little body for four or five hours, without a break, without a pause in her banshee wailing, and i literally -vividly and exquisitely- imagined killing myself, over and over, putting a pistol in my mouth and squeezing the trigger. very detailed, i could taste the metal of the gun, the weight of barrel on my tongue, the resistance in the trigger against my finger, and the final white out of my skull being opened. and then i would exhale, and somehow, the mock-suicide allowed me to laugh just enough, provided a momentary valve, that i could keep going.

i bring that up, because i think that's the thing with relationships. they are tantra. real tantra. forget fucking yourself into an hour long orgasm. even a dip shit with zero impulse control can do that. try holding a screaming baby for six months, going without sex, and staying in relationship -conscious relationship- for years with the same people. that's tantra. everything else is tiddly winks. but somehow, in spite of my own dissociative tendencies, in spite of my aversion to intimacy, surrender, submission, and above all relationship, somehow in the last three years there's been a little progress. today my baby cried for two hours, and not once did i have to imagine killing myself while i held her. it's all thanks to my wife, of course. she has stayed, waited, endured, and lovingly (and sometimes sternly) opened the locks on my being, gradually allowing me to become more me. and the actual process of evolution is not a pretty affair. it's like making sausage or laws. you don't want to know how it's actually done. it's tantra. it's relationship. now, when i look at a Tonka and I see the Buddha and Dakini entwined in the sexual asana, i have a very different recognition of what that means than i did five years ago, when my wife first kissed me.

i come from a Zen background, which i felt a (mistaken) alignment with initially because i thought it was a tree fort in the sky, where i could hang out and watch the World. and of course, it's been precisely the opposite. every moment of authentic Zen has led me deeper into relationship, opened me more and more to mysterious ways in which we all exist in each other, until i have begun to feel my very own being inextricably mingled with heart and soul of my wife, daughters, family, friends, and strangers. as its always been, it just took years of tutorials from my (vajrayana) wife to open my eyes.

and i'm finally at the beginning. my wife has gotten me to the starting line, because after a five year intensive retreat in tantric relationship, she has transformed me from an insular, agentic navel-gazer into a grumpy, mercurial family man who's marginally capable of being in real relationships. no small feat, my Dakini darling. hats off to you.

that is to say, my wife prepared me for the music business. the TV business. the worlds of movies, books, and multi-media enterprise. not that i'm some aweseome relational dude now -i'm not and i never will be. i'm a chronic introvert, ironically afflicted with exhibitionist tendencies. but my wife has at least help me grow enough to be in relationship. not to be good at it, or exemplary, but functional. adequate. work-able. sufficient for the task at hand. and that's all the Mystery was looking for.

i realize all this now, as I sit in L.A. in the studio, working on finishing this album, which i am determined -absolutely resolved- to see become a huge record. what will it take? relationship. lots and lots of committed relationship. sustained engagement with many, many people in the music world. and i am committed to that, and eagerly receive it as a gift, an opportunity to expand and cultivate love in the world. five years ago? NEVER could have done it. would have freaked out, and run off to some Zen retreat. would have fled, and hid in my tree fort in the sky. today, i know there is company in solitude, and solitude in company. that's my heart beating in my daughters chest, my breath moving in and out of my wife's body. and so on with all people. i WANT the relationships that will allow for us to all enact our greatest love in this life. i am ready to see Alex Gibson and Nate Jenkins at the top of their field. and this is the year. i am ready to go all ove the world and participate in an exuberant awakening in mainstream media. i'm ready to go arm and arm with Majeski Media into the dumpsters and temples that make up these industries. now is the time. it's all about love. and i have my wife to thank for making it possible.

what i'm called to do in this life is participate in mystery through art. we awaken each other with these lamps: music, television, movies, books, art, and events. all of those are entirely relational. it is an inter-subjective age. i have deep conviction there is a large, significant awakening under way. in all spiritual traditions, in all realms, and our continued existence as a species depends upon our ability to navigate it. we either make this evolutionary leap in the next few generations, or we are literally fucked and extinct. it would be enromous loss of depth and love if that were to happen. now, without sounding grandiose, that's where the love is. that's where the action is. to whatever extent i am allowed to participate in this unfolding, this increase in our humanity, i want to absolutely give it ALL. i want to contribute as much luminosity as possible. that requires relationship. i want to be in relationship with millions of people, through art, in order to serve all of us becoming more human. in order to serve all sentient beings.

i thank my wife, my friends, my teachers, my label, and my “enemies” for working with me to make it possible. keep teaching me. please.

  Jane : riversong

Re: Stuart Davis

Jane said Aug 8, 2007, 6:29 PM:

 

Yippee, hooray for Stuart…. what a wonderful exposition! My heart soars.
Jane

  Ewan : Rhythm

Re: Stuart Davis

Ewan said Aug 9, 2007, 1:21 AM:

 

Wow.

  Gina : dancing

Re: Stuart Davis

Gina said Nov 2, 2007, 9:10 AM:

 

Stuart speaks to the divine Feminine.

My heart was aching while reading this.

Thank you Stuart.

  Lauren : mammal

Re: Stuart Davis

Lauren said Nov 2, 2007, 11:28 AM:

 

mmmmm, Gina. Thanks.

  Teenie~Dakini : ~.~  I have my moments  ~.~

Re: Stuart Davis

Teenie~Dakini said Nov 3, 2007, 10:37 PM:

 

Thanks Gina!    Mmmmm with you, Lauren!  :-)

And for all to enjoy (easily….)  in full brilliance:

The Feminine Divine

Song of the Day: Sara / Fleetwood Mac
Word of the Day: Superlation / Aggrandizing Hype

Just finished three days at the third annual Integral Spiritual Center gathering. I was privileged enough to provide music for a group of spiritual teachers that included Father Thomas Keating, Brother David Steidle-Ross, Rabbi Zallman, Roger Walsh, Swami Sally Kempton, Linda and Saniel Bonder, Musho Di Hamilton Sensei, Genpo Roshi, Terry Patton, James Fowler, David Deida, Sophia Diaz, and of course the kooky Bodhisattva we have to thank for the whole thing, Ken Wilber.

One of the things that came up at this ISC event that I really feel aligned with is the sense that what is really needed right now is a full integration of the feminine. The divine feminine, of course, but also in a practical sense, socially, politically, and personally. Not just more feminine leadership and guidance, but a more full unfolding of the feminine in men as well.

On day two of the event Genpo Roshi, while conducting Big Mind with the group, asked to speak to one of the deeper feminine voices in each of us. What came through me (speaking as that Feminine voice) was a real sense of heart break and waiting. The Divine Feminine voice in me said she was waiting for five little boys to grow up (Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Judaism). She needs -literally- to make love in this world, to give birth to a new way for the planet to exist. She has been holding her love and attention over this planet for thousands of years, watching as five little boys have had their way with a World they are not mature enough to steward. She is waiting to usher in a future, but she can't do it alone, and she won't have a partner until the five little boys grow up. Humanity's survival depends on it. Not the survival of the religions, or faith, or god, or even the planet. People. If people are going to keep living, if we have hope of being around in 1,000 or 10,000 years from now, we will have grow into a full, mature balance with the feminine -at every level of ourselves.

I'm not a militant feminist or anything, but I (stuart, that is, the normal guy, not the Divine Feminine) will say flat out that the five major religions have been an unremitting patriarchal circus for as far back as we care to trace their history. To this day, none of them have truly included, embraced, and expressed the depths of the healthy mature feminine Wisdom that is so desperately needed to usher us into our future selves.

I thought it was very interesting that David Deida pointed to research that shows women (collectively) are developmentally 15 years ahead of men in this country. I believe it. Being at ISC this week has really put me back in touch with this ache, this pain in my heart that unless all of us -men & women- find a way to bring true mature balance to our Wisdom traditions, we're screwed. I am convicted that unless 1, the five little boys grow into healthy men, and 2, the feminine and masculine of those traditions grow into a balance they've never had -unless those two things happen, the prospects are very, very dim.

Either the next 1,000 years will be the age of the feminine or it will simply be one of the last ages. That would be so sad, and honestly the ache in my heart over this also comes from hoping we don't forfeit this incredible gift. The precious, rare human vehicle. Such an exquisite combination, our blend of animal and angel. Every minute we straddle base instinct and high intuition.

I started really ruminating about this stuff around 2001. No coincidence this when I fell in love with my wife. In a very concrete way, the feminine divine showed up in my life through my wife, and since that first time we kissed I have been a student of that Mystery. I don't just literally experience my wife as a Goddess, an Angel, a Dakini. I KNOW she is. There are few things I am sure of in this way. But I do know I am utterly incapable -on my own- of becoming a better person, of living more fully as love, of going against the seduction of my personal preferences, of being a dad, a partner, an artist, a spiritual practitioner. And I do know absolutely that my wife is the only person I've ever met who I trust enough to enter the crucible of Family. I am clear that I need to learn how to serve the feminine (mundane and divine) and that I really, really need help. My wife is the one. She is the living embodiment of feminine wisdom that I don't understand but so deeply need. I cannot survive without it, I cannot fulfill my purpose without her. Having taken the Bodhisattva's Vow (to awaken for the sake of all beings, to continue working until they are all free) I know how LOST I would be in this work without her. The truth is left to my own impulses, my own preferences, my offering would be a fraction of what it is with her.

She has not had the easiest job in the world. When she became my partner I'd spent ten years doing what I wanted, with whomever I wanted, whenever I wanted, however I wanted. I had a very distorted perspective of love, family, relationship, and spirituality. I was a dissociated Zen Practitioner. My idea of practice was climbing into my Buddhist Tree Fort in the clouds and removing myself from the mess of reality, family, relationships. My wife is the only one who's ever been able to get me out of that tree fort in the sky. She has pulled me into mess after mess. I am not out of the woods, I never will be. But after five years with her I feel so blessed that she has had the patience and strength to sit in the furnace with me. To hold me in relationship, to help me learn to be a husband, a friend, a father. It has been slow and painful, for everyone involved. I would not trade it for anything in the Universe. I feel it working. I know my life is in the right place.

This is how the science of love works. The empirical method of “we”. I go kicking and screaming, fighting my wife (because I am that little boy, I have been all five little boys my whole life). My personality, the facade of my small self, screams “this is bullshit! fuck this!”. My soul knows better, and says “freak out all you want, we're following HER.” And luckily, the soul is actually steering the vehicle. These experiments prove what works. You repeat the experiment, it works again. Pretty soon it's obvious that trusting this woman, that leaning into her wisdom produces more clarity, greater depth, bigger love. You can't deny the data.

The soul will let the personality sit on its lap and pretend its driving most of the time, but when a truly important direction is needed, it will take the wheel and tell the personality “too bad, we're going this way”. And that's the way it's been with me and my wife. My personality -for years- thought it was all insane. Marriage? Kids? Messy, noisy, complicated tests that continually expose me as the clumsy, lazy, dork I am? Why would I take that instead of fucking groupies, changing towns every night, hotels, parties, and an endless succession of fun (intermingled with lots of Buddhist meditation to make me look SOOOO good and spiritual…). Why did I go with my wife instead of the carnival? More importantly why have I stayed with my wife? More-more importantly why has she stayed with me? Put up with the punishing trial that is marriage to spoiled little boy?

Because she sees beyond it. Beneath it, through it, and she knows there's more in there. A husband, a dad, an artist, a Bodhisattva wanting to do real work, who really needs help. She sees things I can't, and lucky for me it happens to be her craft, her genius, to patiently tease apart the knots, to study the blocks with the love that dissolves them. Over years of holding her love over the chaos in my head and heart and soul, something happens. A little boy grows up.

That is what I want. To learn in this life how to leave the World more whole, more full of love than it was when I came into it. I want to participate in serving the age of Feminine on this planet, because our healing requires it, and so does our survival. Beyond just surviving, I know we can't really be free without that part. Nothing can be left behind, left out. It's a very big thing to want those five little boys to grow up. But the way I can help make that happen is just really recognizing how I am that little boy. Focus my life by trusting and submitting to my wife and daughters as often as is needed (millions upon millions of times). Not just submitting in a way that forfeits my power. Surrendering in the way that allows me to die into a bigger self. I can't do it without her.

It does not often make sense to my rational mind. The gifts my wife and daughters give me are routinely unrecognizable to my thinking self. But my soul knows its in the right hands. As the little boy of Buddhism, I am so grateful to be able to be growing up, and into a better partner for my wife. And I want my daughters to grow into a world where their feminine presence, their unique Wisdom is received as the saving Grace it truly is.

I want to take this moment to thank all the women who have been waiting for the little boys to grow up. Thank you for your patience and your willingness to remain. Please show us how to receive the gift of your grace. Thank you for not giving up on us, after all we've put you through. Even in the midst of what we're putting you through right now, all over the world. Help us wake up in time.


  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Feb 7, 2008, 9:26 PM:

 

Dive [click for YouTube video]

Becoming mist again
the body is a drop
Water never ends
The body is a drop
Water never ends

It isn't a mistake
the swimmer is asleep
Water is awake
the swimmer is asleep
Water is awake

It isn't a mistake
becoming mist again
Water is a friend

Chorus:
Under this wave
over this soul
Losing my arms
Nothing to hold
Nowhere to swim
ready to drown
Longing to dive
Love pulls me down
Where the water is awake
The water is alive
Dive

Nothing to hold
an island in the head
Water in the soul
an island in the head
Water in the soul

Something will survive
let the body melt
Water is alive
Let the body melt
Water is alive

Something will survive
Nothing here to hold
Let the body fold

Chorus

Now I dive
into this mystery
into this place
that has no history
That has no face
everything but water
will be erased
as I dive
The water is awake
The water is alive

~~~

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Mar 8, 2008, 9:09 AM:

 

I published a Stuart Davis essay on integralnews.com a while back; it got great feedback - check it out:

Infinity Hymn

In other Stuart Davis news, he's got a new album coming out, whoo-hoo!  From his website:

~~~

May 2nd, KBCO 97.3 presents Stuart Davis live in Concert at Soiled Dove in Denver. This is the CD release for Stuart's new album Something Simple, in stores everywhere March 25th. Don't miss this special night in one of Colorado's finest live music venues.

Tickets on sale now.


~~~

Stuart is ginormously entertaining live, so if you have a chance to see that show in Denver, you owe it to yourself, your soul, and all sentient beings throughout space and time to check it out.  I can safely say, without fear of exaggeration, that the very survival of the human species - not to mention the entire future evolution of the kosmos - could depend on whether or not YOU are there.

(Or at the very least, even if you've never dug the Stu vibe before, you may find yourself really digging his music after seeing him live.  I've seen it happen.)

spiral out,
Arthur


  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Mar 8, 2008, 9:17 AM:

 

One other thing - Stu is touring for his new album, check out the list of Upcoming Shows - and note that, shockingly, there are no dates on the west coast yet.  I've PM'd Stu and let him know that if he doesn't do a date close to where I live, he will be spanked.  (Stuart has a Gaia profile, so feel free to PM him yourself and harass, intimidate, and cajole him yourself - remember, the goal here is tour dates in California and/or Oregon!)  :P 

spirals,
Arthur

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Mar 25, 2008, 7:40 PM:

 

WHOO-HOO!  Stuart's new album (Something Simple) is out!

Plus, check out his funkadelic redesigned website: http://www.stuartdavis.com/

It's continuously streaming his new album, and I'm totally digging it.  I'm going to buy this as soon as his website will take PayPal payments (PP is there, but it's not accepting payments just yet).

“Already Free”

Something simple
in me
woke up
already free

A thousand stories
removed
Living proof
nothing to prove

But I needed a push
to get me to see
Wherever I am
I'm already free

Hearts and minds
collide
Twist together
opening wide

My head is beneath
my feet are above
tangled up
in a comedy of…

But I needed a push
to get me to see
Wherever I am
I'm already free

I dug a tunnel
when I needed a lift
such a fool
just afraid of a gift

Something subtle
started to shift
now I'm soaring
over cliffs

But I needed a push
to get me to see
Wherever I am
I'm already free

~~~

  Liz : deLizious

Re: Stuart Davis

Liz said Mar 25, 2008, 8:13 PM:

 

Yeah, yeah, already free, blah, blah, blah.

I'm tired of all these enlightened people running around saying how easy it all is and effortless, and “gateless gate,” etc.

Whatever. What has Stuart or any of them ever done for me?

Liz

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Mar 25, 2008, 8:30 PM:

 

Liz: Whatever. What has Stuart or any of them ever done for me?

~

Hmm…apparently not much, baby - but Stuart gives great hug!  You'll see someday.  :)

“Love made a wick out of my tongue…”

spirals,
Arthur

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Mar 25, 2008, 8:21 PM:

 

Man, I am so loving this album.  I want to give Stuart a big hug RIGHT NOW.  His lyrics are so groovy.

Check out Wand - obviously inspired by the amazing movie The Fountain:

Wand

I’ve been building a volcano
In the basement of my navel
Stuck a straw into the sun
Sucked some light into my lungs
Love made a wick out of my tongue

Hate
Hate is a puzzle
One look and I saw double
Fear
Fear is a riddle
That made my bones brittle
Love
Love is a wand
One wave, the riddle’s gone

There’s a field of flowers pushing
Through the tissue in the torso
Love dropped that seed into my wound
Step up, my chest is gonna bloom
You should get a whiff of this perfume

Which is streaming for me right now…oooh…yeah baby.  :)

gleefully spiraling out,
Arthur

  Liz : deLizious

Re: Stuart Davis

Liz said Mar 26, 2008, 7:19 PM:

 

Now I have to post the corresponding picture….
recycling

  Kate : DatingGod

Re: Stuart Davis

Kate said Mar 27, 2008, 9:37 AM:

 

oh yeah … the new album is so good … it's on constant rotation … have you seen his “other blog”? it's at http://www.dreamusher.com/ and he has a button up for paypal.  “the wand” is fabulous … and river is also delicious … :)

  Gina : dancing

Re: Stuart Davis

Gina said Jun 26, 2008, 10:15 AM:

 


In concert
LA  July 5th

Knitting Factory

  adastra : Curious Mutant

Re: Stuart Davis

adastra said Jun 26, 2008, 10:44 AM:

 

Thanks for the head's-up on the LA show, Gina!  Sadly, the timing of that show - like Stuart Davis himself, but this time in a bad way - sucks with great intensity. Liz and I definately won't be able to make it.

Therefore, Stu, I dedicate one of your own songs to you: Asshole World Renown:

Bored stiff with my wallet fat, I ordained myself a diplomat
bought a plane and some aerosol, sprayed my name on China's Wall
Then I pissed all over the Kremlin steps, punched a monk in Tibet
got drunk and disordered in the ol' big Apple, passed gas in the Cistine Chapel

I've thrown darts at the Mona Lisa, tied lead weights to the tower of Pisa
sold salt water in the big Sahara, then I took a shit in the Riviera
Asshole World Renown

Went to Rome and spread V.D., robbed the homeless in Tahiti
was slapped by a woman in the great Euphrates, kidnapped kids in the slums of Haiti
Poisoned livestock in Korea, tainted food shelves in Tanzania
torched Saigon like a Buddhist pyro, slashed tires in the streets of Cairo

I chucked eggs at Castro's doorway, I once puked on the king of Norway
for eighteen days I roamed Japan, choking little kittens with my bare hands
Stuck my gum on Venus De Milo, did Zimbabwe shooting rhinos
ran nude straight through Nepal, spit my chew in Taj Mahal

Asshole World Renown

~~~

<sigh>  Oh well…whoever gets to go to this show: enjoy!  He's wickedly entertaining.

cheers,
Arthur