Explore
Gaia Soulmates
down  About This Group
Integral Psychotherapy

The purpose of this pod is to be a group blog for practicing counsellors and therapists who are interested in how therapy works within a post-postmodern context.  We are looking for members to have completed recognized qualifications of at least associate or bachelor's degree level before joining us here.  The AQAL Model will be highlighted, but any approach that...(more)
down  About This Room
This board is for seeding topics that are worthy of the development of longer (200 - 800 word posts) on integral psychotherapy.
down  Room Activity
No Recent Activity
down  Group Grapevine
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?
Resultset_previousprevious thread | next threadResultset_next
threaded | unthreaded | newest first


  Durwin : Radical dad

Three pillars of integral psychotherapy

Durwin said May 28, 2007, 9:53 AM:

 

I will evolve this post a little over-time, but please contribute as you see fit! (Cross-posted to my blog)

Last week, I attended three days of a national counselling conference here in Vancouver, Canada.  A highlight was listening to a leading local therapist named Patricia Wilensky, widely regarded in these parts as a master clinician.  Among other areas, she specializes in group work, but particularly in working with shadow elements of individuals via therapeutic enactment – an updated form of psychodrama.  She has written a book on therapeutic enactment with my supervisor, Marv Westwood. 

One compelling item she discussed (she is an indidivual who seems to really hold the attention of folks!) was the necessity of therapists to “bring the shadow into the room”, for therapeutic purposes, but also to avoid vicarious traumatization as therapists.  Finding ways to broach the unsaid, such as feelings of shame – so common for both clients and counsellors – is important.  Other ways are through use of humour, active imagination – well, please feel free to respond with more!

In the context of integral psychotherapy, I believe we need to add two more items that need to be brought into the room.  Together, perhaps, these three constitute “three pillars of integral psychotherapy” (I am borrowing the phrase from the Zen classic Three pillars of Zen). 

OK, so here are the other two:  evolution and ever-present Spirit.  So, the integral psychotherapist is challenged to bring all three of these items appropriately into the room.  Outside of integral psychotherapy, I don't believe there is any system that includes all three…but please inform me if I am wrong, because then our synthetic work will be made easier!

So, how do we bring evolution into the room?  To think of this in more psychodynamic terms, we can think of the emergent unconscious.  In integral psychotherapy we acknowledge not only the repressed submergent unconscious i.e. what is typically referred to as the shadow, but also the supressed emergent unconscious (which is a kind of shadow too, but mainstream psychodynamic therapists don't have this on their map). 

One simple technique for bringing the emergent unconscious into the room comes from solution-focused therapy.  Solution-focused approaches have the potential to be “shallow” in the sense of focusing on exterior problem-solving.  But I believe there is also a deeper intuition at work in solution-focused approaches in their emphasis on the relevance of the future to psychotherapy. 

The miracle question from solution-focused therapy is one way to bring evolution into the room in integral psychotherapy.  Basically, that question is the following (some of you may already be familiar):

“If you were to go to sleep tonight, and when you woke up in the morning, a miracle had occurred and your problem had been solved, what would be different? What would you notice, see, feel, and so on”.  The technique is to have the client actively imagine this scene in as concrete detail as possible –really bring it to life.

That is one way to bring evolution into the room in integral psychotherapy.  Please  feel free to contribute more ideas…

The third item was Spirit or ever-present Big Mind, or Self or however we want to refer to that of ultimate concern.  How to bring this into the room?  Let's think of spirituality in terms of a line of development:  as KW suggests in Integral Spirituality, we could think of spirituality as the adaptive intelligence that evolves as an answer to the question: of what is ultimate concern?

At another conference I attended, a nurse-practitioner who works expertly with spirituality noted that she has found that speaking about suffering…particularly using that term suffering…is a great way to open people into a discussion of spirituality without going at it too directly in a way that might be off-putting to clients.  She found that in asking people about their experience of suffering, they pretty much immediately would move to a consideration of ultimacy in some manner.  So here is one way to bring Spirit into the room.

Hopefully this helps get the ball rolling on this topic.  At the very least, SES – shadow, evolution, spirit – with the play on words to Ken's book…these three items the integral psychotherapist wants to 1) have in back of the mind during session to help orient the work; and, 2) look for appopriate ways to bring these aspects “into the room”.

 

Re: Three pillars of integral psychotherapy

Patrick [no longer around] said May 28, 2007, 2:20 PM:

 

HI Durwin, and thanks for this nice post. I have very little time to think these days, but here are some “on the spot” ideas about what you call the three pillars.

1) As for shadow, I work a lot with transferance and counter-transferance.

2) Evolution is indeed an important notion to bring into therapy. I associate it with “time”, and I think that bringing the lower quadrants, collective, into therapy is usefull. It helps people get out of non-dynamic guilt: the problem they're facing is a collective one, which expresses itself in their lives. the answer they find will help the collective!

3) As for Spirit, I find it is the hardest element to bring into therapy. As meditation is very fashionable those days, I teach nearly all my patients that technique. They are willing to try, but few make it a daily discipline. I find that it is the best technique to get an “internal ” UL glimpse of what Spirit is.

I hope I'll have time to dive deeper in these matters soon.


Love to you,
Patrick

  Durwin : Radical dad

Re: Three pillars of integral psychotherapy

Durwin said May 28, 2007, 4:16 PM:

 

Hello Patrick: Thanks for your thoughtful response to my post.  I wanted to clarify a little number 2 where you mention evolution, time and relationship to the collective.  Yes, evolution is something that occurs on the relative side of the street and therefore in time, yes? (you are a Vedanta type I notice…I like Vedanta too!).  In terms of the collective, I could see that helping a client see that their personal change will influence others positively may help them to “take the leap” to make necessary changes.  Were you meaning to make a connection between the collective and evolution as well?
I don't mean to press you…just interested to know your thoughts…

Durwin

 

Re: Three pillars of integral psychotherapy

Patrick [no longer around] said May 29, 2007, 4:49 AM:

 

Hi Durwin,

Yes, I was bridging the collective with the notion of evolution. it seems to me that the notion of evolution is better percieved when the collective is brought in.

I don't know, though, how well   people who are suffering, and who tend to feel disconnected from the collective, can relate to this LL quadrant. that's a discussion in itself.



Patrick

  Durwin : Radical dad

Re: Three pillars of integral psychotherapy

Durwin said Jun 3, 2007, 10:03 AM:

 

Re: how well individuals can relate to the LL quadrant…
Well, it would definitely make sense to me that an individual who is suffering will be experiencing disjunctures or quadrant clashes of various sorts – so they may definitely feel that there are problems with their relationships to others!!!  Working on relationships is often so central to therapeutic work, yes, with the associated “validity claims” of appropriateness, justice, and kindness and compassion.

Thanks for your contribution, here.

Regards,
Durwin