<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Gaia: Integral Strength - **Tips &amp; Techniques** - The power of the drop set</title>
    <id>tag:gaia.com,2008,:Gaia</id>
    <link>http://groups.gaia.com/integralstrength/discussions/feeds/thread/368283</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>2</ttl>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:28:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <description>Gaia: Integral Strength - **Tips &amp; Techniques** - The power of the drop set</description>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The power of the drop set</title>
      <author>#</author>
      <dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
      <guid>tag:gaia.com,2008:Gaia-368488</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:28:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://groups.gaia.com/integralstrength/conversations/view/368283#368488</link>
      <description>


&lt;p&gt;      Marc&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank-you for sharing this with the group, I find it interesting how people are using the broad framework of FIT within the different forms of training.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To continue on this theme there is a principle in training called &amp;quot;general adaptation&amp;quot; that recommends changing the rep, set, weights, exercises, speed and pace so the body (mind and spirit extended also to this principle) never has a chance to adjust to the tension that is applied.&amp;nbsp; Change when necessary to avoid routine, and keep the body and spirit adapting to different sensations and experiences.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you want to take this principle to the next level I recommend having a read of the following link and quote on EDT or Escalating Density Training:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.staleytraining.com/articles/charles-staley/edt-for-maximal-strength-development.htm"&gt;http://www.staleytraining.com/articles/charles-staley/edt-for-maximal-strength-development.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Tahoma" size="2"&gt;To a lesser degree, MxS improvements                also lead to higher levels of aerobic fitness, agility, and dynamic                mobility. And to point out a sadly-overlooked fact, MxS development                is a precursor to lean-mass gains, since fast-twitch motor units                have much greater capacity for hypertrophy than do Type I MU&amp;#39;s.                And needless to say, all MU&amp;#39;s must be recruited before they can                be trained.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Tahoma" size="2"&gt;Traditional MxS training involves                the use of maximal or near-maximal loads, typically 90% of 1RM and                above. The maximal-load method has validity and a proven track record                for results. However, load is only one-half of the equation, since                it is tension- not load- that provokes anatomical adaptations leading                to MxS improvements. These adaptations include improved inter- and                intra-muscular coordination, as well as more efficient rate-coding.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;font face="Tahoma" size="2"&gt;Tension of course, is the offspring                of load and speed. High loads, performed at (unavoidably) low speeds                produce high tensions- that&amp;#39;s a given. Less appreciated however,                is the fact that moderate loads, moved at high speeds, also lead                to high tensions. So as it turns out, there are two distinctively                different methods that can be employed in your quest for MxS. Given                what we know about the importance of variety for the sake of preventing                physical and psychological stagnation, why not employ both methods?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;                          I have found EDT training&amp;nbsp; conducive in a FIT training philosophy of going deep into intensity for short periods of time, and extended period of rest into a deep reflective state.&amp;nbsp; Its highly efficient, powerful, however leaves enough space for witness state to emerge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The EDT for me works best with Olympic and power lifting movements and it is recommended if you are to experiment with this training that you are familiar with the basics of these lifts in a conventional sense before embarking on an EDT program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Strength and spirit&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Damon &lt;/p&gt;

      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The power of the drop set</title>
      <author>http://quanta-fire.gaia.com</author>
      <dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
      <guid>tag:gaia.com,2008:Gaia-368283</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:07:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <link>http://groups.gaia.com/integralstrength/conversations/view/368283</link>
      <description>


&lt;p&gt;      For the last 2 weeks I&amp;#39;ve been wondering why I&amp;#39;ve not really seen any noticeable difference in my physique from arriving at week 6. And then, tonight, it clicked. The drop set. And the power of changing weights.&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Let me explain how I see this from my padawan view from week 6.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;A lot of my training so far has focused on being REALLY slow but lifting weights that although were difficult, they didn&amp;#39;t really challenge me all too much. Then, I actually took some time to read S4L PROPERLY and realised that I was just using the same weight all the way through. Even for the drop set. So, the last 2 strength training workouts, I changed it up. I increased the weight as my routine went through (making my form SO much more sloppy but requiring a much greater presence to what was going on) AND, I realised that drop sets are called drop sets because you drop the weight on the second set.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;The way I see the drop set, you&amp;#39;re working out your arms and getting them into a big contraction from the heavy weights (that are a real test for me to push) and THEN you&amp;#39;re using smaller weights to HOLD that contraction and go deeper. Would this be anyone else&amp;#39;s experience? It&amp;#39;s like the heavier weights build something up, and then the smaller weights are more controlled ways to really dig in deep and USE that...&amp;quot;suchness&amp;quot; whatever it is. The difference is phenomenal to me.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;This is the way I see it, and it works really well (on an intellectual level anyway) but I really feel my arms get so much more fatigued afterwards. To the point that now, I sit here more fatigued in my arms than I have been since starting this.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Part of me is mad that I didn&amp;#39;t get onto this earlier and may not have gotten as much out of the last 5 weeks as I could have. But part of me is like &amp;quot;Whatever, wow! Embrace it&amp;quot;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Just wanted to share this.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Thanks,&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Marc&lt;/div&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
