|
|
Re: The Core EssentialsRob said Feb 8, 2007, 8:36 AM: |
||
|
Damon, Thanks for resurfacing this question as I know you brought it up in another post. This question has been on my “to do” list for quite some time simply because your inquiry is pointed at such an important distiniction. Ok, as I respond please know that I’m going to paint with some broad brush strokes. This is for the sake of simplicity and clarity. I’m not trying to over generalize or simplify, certainly the territory is much more complicated than any of our maps. Here we go… Damon, You feel most alive after deep meditation as well as extreme exercise. Here’s one of the essential differences between these two states of being in my experience. Meditation is specializes in Awareness. Now here’s how I’m using the term “awareness” - it is the ever present witness of what is. It is a timeless awake stance that is always the seer. Meditation does many things, but what it does very well is awaken you to your essential seat of awareness. So in the FIT model you’ve got your very “Broad Receptive” states of awareness as well as your “single pointed” concentrated states of awareness - both require a basic stability of mind, the ability to stay present, open and receptive to what is in the ever present moment that you happen to be attending to. While FIT cultivates this awareness dimension, meditation thrives at cultivating your seat as the ever present witness. This awareness dimension reveals liberation, freedom from suffering, the timeless dimesion and so on. This the breath taking stillness from which your witness sees all that is arrising moment to moment. Without a flinch, everything is witnessed, taken in. So when you meditate, I’m guessing you feel most alive because you’re cultivating this seat in some fashion. That’s my general interpretation of my cushion experiences. In terms of “awakening” or development - whatever term you’d like to use - this is only 1/2 of the equation. This is only the masculine half of the picture. If the basic masculine stance is to see, we still need the other half - the feminine stance of being seen. This feminine half is something I call Embrace. Embrace is “the dance” as I often refer to it. It is the intention and activity into manifestation - as manifestation. So there’s the timeless eternal witness, and there’s the temporal dance of you (really everything in manifestation). Now you’ve got both sides of Spirit, the divine Freedom and the divine Fullness of manifestation (as Wilber might put it). Strength Training thrives at Embrace. It thrives at helping you to move deeply into your body-mind. You don’t “embrace” your body-mind as the witness does, watching from your ever present perch, rather you Embrace your body-mind as the body-mind. You don’t watch the dance, you are the dance. Embrace brings forth and enacts the fullness of manifestation (as opposed to the freedom from manifestation). Meditation also works on Embrace, but Strength Training - particularly the type of strength training we’ve been talking about here - thrives at cultivating Embrace, how Full you bring your divine presence into this body-mind and moment. So generally speaking - remember broad brush strokes - meditation excels at cultivating your Awareness - your Freedom. Strength Training in contrast excells at cultivating your Embrace - the Fullness with which you show up in and dance as your body-mind in this and every moment. As you can see these are two difference faces of “life” if you will. Both make you feel more “alive” “awake” and “full” however meditation and strength training - even when you integrate the two - have different emphasis. ~Rob |
|||
|
|
Re: The Core EssentialsRob said Feb 18, 2007, 9:20 PM: |
||
|
Ok, I’m a total sucker for great Q’s so here’s a quick stab at these. How does one recognise where one needs a focus on one aspect of the spectrum of awareness? - I think this is one of the central contributions of the AQAL framework- the integral landscape is a great tool for sweeping one’s life and figuring out what’s being left out in some way. - Although, there’s no way to see it all so to speak - every perspective has its blindspot, which leads to the importance of an integral practice. Regardless of what you see and don’t see, if you’re “training” all of the major aspects of yourself on a regular basis you’re more likely to stuble across and start working on dimensions that might have otherwise have fallen off the map and into blindspots. Can/should strength training be used as an exclusive practice without the need from the influence of other practices? - Absolutely! I believe strength training is a discipline full unto itself. With that said though, strength training and the practioner doing the strength training are fundamentally not two. For most people, there’s much to gain from looking at the depth, tradition and lineage within say the yogic, martial arts and contempative/meditative traditions as there’s much to be learned from the thousands of years of practice. - My bias is that at a certain point these other approaches that can compliment strength training must be “put down” so to speak. Once a certain level of maturity has been achieved a dedictated strength trainer has the responsibility to the discipline and to him/herself to truely give themselves to the practice, give themselves to the weights fully and whole heartedly. That’s my bias though… the field of authentic mastery resides beyond this step. Are there limitations to strength training even within the deeper FIT context? What are they? - This is an excellent question, There’s the obvious its not going to turn you into a marathon runner by itself. I don’t think you’re inquiring along these lines though - No its not going to increase the number of mitochondria in your cells… with that said, strength training’s limitation is that it is primarily a zone 1 practice (meaning zones 2 through 8 aren’t the central focus). I’m going AQAL crazy right now - but check out Ken Wilber’s Integral Methodological Pluralism to learn more about this. He’s brilliantly articulate on this front and I think I’ll leave this clarity to him. You can read about it his book Integral Sprituality or on his posts on the shambhala site (and also on the Integral Spiritual Center website). - I think the limitations brought about by this practice as it pertains within the inside of the UL quadrant (zone one), are largely a result of the practitioner. - With that said the biggest limitation is there isn’t the LL cultural network of practioners and “teachers” so to speak that can lead people down this UL interior road. The whole field of strength training is caught in the UR quadrant - for the most part the exteriors are honored and recognized (and in most cases worshipped). This is truely a shame. It’s painful feeling this rift within the fast majority of gyms around the US (and I’m guessing around the world - although my strenght training outside of the US is very limited (Switzerland was my last non US training experience and I didn’t see or feel much of a difference on this front). This is a HUGE hurdle, one that I hope to contribute to with my writing and my work with people in their training. What should a FIT seeker look out for as signs you are off the map. - Ok, you are off the hook! You’re Q’s are just AMAZING! Love em buddy… - I’m going to just give an overview of a bundle of stuff - some more on the practical side of the street, others more on the theoretical side of things. a. Self critical self talk / unwillingness to compare with others (both are a “sticking point”
- Perhaps the biggest obstacle when FIT has really been integrated and “mastered” (please not mastering FIT is not the mastery of Strength Training) is the attachment to enjoyment. This is what I call the “pleasure trap.” It’s a nasty place to get caught because its so hard to get out. This attachment or sticking point as I’ll often call them often cuts you off from the genuine joy of training but the biggest nail in the foot is this attachment stunts the ongoing development within their own evolution of strength training. - The way out of this is to further focus working on one’s ability to surrender to the process of training and to go after the more uncomfortable or “painful” (pain from a more conventional stand point) dimensions of training. Burrowing down to the core of intention is critical and this is perhaps the one stage that a contemplative practice outside of one’s training is VERY helpful. Ok, there’s my two cents buddy…
PS: someone else get in on this good stuff! |
|||
|
|
Re: The Core EssentialsRob said May 10, 2007, 10:38 AM: |
||
|
Hey Damon, |
|||