| |
Marc
Thank-you for sharing this with the group, I find it interesting how people are using the broad framework of FIT within the different forms of training.
To continue on this theme there is a principle in training called “general adaptation” that recommends changing the rep, set, weights, exercises, speed and pace so the body (mind and spirit extended also to this principle) never has a chance to adjust to the tension that is applied. Change when necessary to avoid routine, and keep the body and spirit adapting to different sensations and experiences.
If you want to take this principle to the next level I recommend having a read of the following link and quote on EDT or Escalating Density Training:
http://www.staleytraining.com/articles/charles-staley/edt-for-maximal-strength-development.htm
To a lesser degree, MxS improvements also lead to higher levels of aerobic fitness, agility, and dynamic mobility. And to point out a sadly-overlooked fact, MxS development is a precursor to lean-mass gains, since fast-twitch motor units have much greater capacity for hypertrophy than do Type I MU's. And needless to say, all MU's must be recruited before they can be trained. Traditional MxS training involves the use of maximal or near-maximal loads, typically 90% of 1RM and above. The maximal-load method has validity and a proven track record for results. However, load is only one-half of the equation, since it is tension- not load- that provokes anatomical adaptations leading to MxS improvements. These adaptations include improved inter- and intra-muscular coordination, as well as more efficient rate-coding. Tension of course, is the offspring of load and speed. High loads, performed at (unavoidably) low speeds produce high tensions- that's a given. Less appreciated however, is the fact that moderate loads, moved at high speeds, also lead to high tensions. So as it turns out, there are two distinctively different methods that can be employed in your quest for MxS. Given what we know about the importance of variety for the sake of preventing physical and psychological stagnation, why not employ both methods?
I have found EDT training conducive in a FIT training philosophy of going deep into intensity for short periods of time, and extended period of rest into a deep reflective state. Its highly efficient, powerful, however leaves enough space for witness state to emerge.
The EDT for me works best with Olympic and power lifting movements and it is recommended if you are to experiment with this training that you are familiar with the basics of these lifts in a conventional sense before embarking on an EDT program.
Strength and spirit
Damon
|
