|
|
Two Thoughts for Inner and World PeaceDarkchanter said Nov 22, 2006, 6:28 PM: |
||
|
Two thoughts for both inner-peace and to co-create world peace:
Us humans seem to think that because we can differentiate between forms - because we can perceive a difference between two things (or people) - that the one must be better than the other. Forms, and people, are differertiated - not seperate. Here are two subliminal - or, if you prefer, transcendant - truths:
The basic instinct of human being is not survival, it is love. Want some evidence: watch 911 or a similar program and listen to what the hero's say. It is always an act of love that occurs without thinking (that's a definition of what instinct is) before an act of ensuring personal safety. |
|||
|
|
Re: Two Thoughts for Inner and World Peacemary said Nov 24, 2006, 9:37 AM: |
||
|
Darkchanter, hello! |
|||
|
|
Re: Two Thoughts for Inner and World PeaceDarkchanter said Nov 24, 2006, 11:51 AM: |
||
|
Thankyou, Mary :) |
|||
|
|
Re: Two Thoughts for Inner and World Peacemary said Nov 24, 2006, 12:15 PM: |
||
|
Absolutely! And distribution systems are really based on the values and ideology of the system producing them. |
|||
|
|
Re: Two Thoughts for Inner and World PeaceDarkchanter said Nov 25, 2006, 12:48 AM: |
||
|
I agree with you in general. Please allow me to make (some more) subtle differentiations… |
|||
|
|
Re: Two Thoughts for Inner and World Peacemary said Nov 25, 2006, 3:54 AM: |
||
|
Good point! |
|||
|
|
Re: Two Thoughts for Inner and World PeaceDarkchanter said Nov 25, 2006, 10:39 PM: |
||
|
It is the behaviour of a composite social organism, yes. By way of elaboration: one's personal physician being trustworthy does not imply that one should trust the medical profession. |
|||
|
|
Re: Two Thoughts for Inner and World Peacemary said Nov 26, 2006, 8:52 AM: |
||
|
Absolutely. As if we become increasingly delusional as we aggregate in fear. But yes, no need to generalize the specifics to the whole. The whole is like, maybe, the least common denominator, or something… Like the famous committee that can formulate nothing more coherent than its least coherent member. It doen't mean that all members are incoherent, only the mean… |
|||

Help



