|
|
Re: shadow and meditationelementstew said May 17, 2007, 8:21 AM: |
||
|
having an effect upon and touching may be different. There is a difference between direct and indirect, no? |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationNicole said May 24, 2007, 7:07 AM: |
||
|
Dear Patrick, I'm far from being an expert on shadow, but I sense that your understanding of it may be quite different from Wilber's. I doubt that he would contend that meditation has no effect on our self-awareness, and so on, but the shadow itself, if I understand it correctly, is not so very “meltable”… |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said May 26, 2007, 7:24 PM: |
||
|
I'm not really sure you want me to weigh in on this because I'm a heavy and I still might be wrong.
Oooops! I used a bad word there - “attaching”. I'll get to that in a moment. But both 1 and 2 in that list are basically the same. If he instead does both 2 and 3 in order, then there is a great shift. If he does only 1 or 3, then the universe is designed to keep pulling him back to the “unreal” reality of consciousness contraction - getting pissed off and reasoning with one another until the problem is consciously resolved. Sorry. He'll never get “established in that state” if he keeps avoiding number 2. Why? Because his fear and loathing of his angry self is creating attachment to the non-angry self. However his attachment is keeping him grounded in the small self because the small self is the one who is attached. The Big Self couldn't care less if he's angry. Big fuckin' deal! So, he's angry! Only the small self cares if he's angry. This, ironically, creates even more hostility between my friend and I!! Why?! Because he hates his angry self so much and he is so unwilling to identify with it, that he sees it in me instead and begins to hate me. He projects all his anger onto me and dis-identifies with me. And if I express interest in going back to #2 and resolving the problem, then I am “attached to my anger and hurt”. So much for enlightenment, peace, love and harmony! The other irony is this: The small self contains the Shadow, right? When the small self is beginning to understand the value of enlightenment, it begins to hate some of the things associated with non-enlightenment:
So when it is just learning about all that stuff but is not yet loosened or dissolved, those things go into the Shadow! That's how the small self functions. When such a person meditates, they begin to believe that they are becoming enlightened because they are losing their identification with those things. But for some mysterious reason they see those things in others all around them and have wild dreams filled with pain and anger and all that. They may become evangelistic in their efforts to preach and teach enlightenment, knowing fully that they themselves are not attached, but are actually surrounded by people who are powerfully attached. You've, no doubt, heard KW's seemingly grandiose estimation of how many people are alive right now who are truly enlightened. I forget, is it like 2 or 3? 4 or 5? Something like that. Guess what's going on with the rest. Those are prolly the boat-anchors that Andrew Cohen keeps picking up. Can meditation touch that? Nope. Only Shadow work. ~Ww |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationNicole said May 27, 2007, 1:45 PM: |
||
|
thanks, Ww, I was hoping you'd go for it! |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said May 31, 2007, 11:20 AM: |
||
|
Go Zone #2 on this post and it's host, Patrick. |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said May 31, 2007, 10:43 PM: |
||
|
Actually, I think you're atomic first. Mamals are pretty far up the chain. |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said May 29, 2007, 8:25 AM: |
||
|
G'morning Nicole, Patrick, et all. |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationPatrick [no longer around] said May 29, 2007, 9:43 AM: |
||
|
HI WW, |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said May 31, 2007, 11:19 AM: |
||
|
I'm sorry, you guys. This is prolly partly my fault. I was in a hurry and didn't edit before I hit the button. |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationNicole said May 30, 2007, 7:20 AM: |
||
|
I'm lost too, Ww, sorry! |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationNicole said Jun 1, 2007, 7:58 AM: |
||
|
have a great retreat patrick! we'll pick this up next week, and you will provide bring new insights and depth from this weekend. |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said Jun 2, 2007, 9:50 PM: |
||
|
Patrick, this is just a little note to let you know what I meant by my Saturday Night Live quote - which you may not be familiar with. Americans are so arrogant, aren't we? Always ass-u-me-ing that the rest of the world is on the same page? |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said Jun 3, 2007, 9:25 PM: |
||
|
Hi, hon. Glad you're back. |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationNicole said Jun 4, 2007, 7:45 AM: |
||
|
Dear Patrick, |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said Jun 4, 2007, 9:09 PM: |
||
|
I'm sorry Patrick, but … |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said Jun 4, 2007, 9:13 PM: |
||
|
Incidentally, methinks that your question to me the other day about whether or not you had hurt me needs to be put back in the correct direction. It is I who has hurt you, and I am sorry. |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationNicole said Jun 5, 2007, 6:37 AM: |
||
|
Dear Patrick and Ww, |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said Jun 5, 2007, 8:12 AM: |
||
|
Hi, hon. Bless the G-man and the Mom and Dad! |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationNicole said Jun 6, 2007, 7:23 PM: |
||
|
Hi Patrick and Ww However you understand integral, please write or speak from that level or altitude. You will be setting an example for others, and you will judged by others based on how well and how often you speak and act integrally. As for the criteria that are used for “judging,” at least a dozen well-known developmental models are used, and professionals who work with those models in the field will be giving us suggestions here. The point here is that, even if you are afraid that your center of gravity is orange or green, you can still think turquoise, you can still talk turquoise, you can still light up turquoise, and the Road Rules help you respond integrally by helping you talk turquoise. The more your talk is second tier, the sooner your walk will be. The fact that you have a really strong interest in Integral Theory already shows that you have at least turquoise cognition, virtually guaranteed. Your center of gravity might be orange or green, or it might be turquoise, but by being in a space that encourages you to think and post turquoise, it helps you—it helps all of us—rise to our own highest occasion. If somebody consistently and belligerently responds from first tier (showing that they are not only acting first-tier but thinking first-tier), they might indeed be asked to step down from that moderated forum. We have other (unmoderated) places they can play, but not on these moderated forums, where we promise each and every one of you that we will do our best to create a turquoise common space. What else is the point of I-I???? Here’s another Road Rule: “Any time that you are not sure whether you are being integral or not, turquoise or not, second tier or not, then feel the thinker; be aware of the thinker.” Every time you are aware of the thinker, you make the subject object, which is the definition of development and transcendence (“the subject of one stage becomes the object of the subject of the next”). This rule—feel the thinker, feel the self-contraction—actually engages third-tier Witnessing. It reminds you and me to be aware of ever-present I AMness, the True Self, in which the entire world is arising. (See Part 2 of the Wyatt blog for an experiential exercise to awaken I AMness.) Here’s another one: “Are there any of my shadow elements in any of my sentences or posts?” Notice this does not say, “Am I aware of any shadow elements in other people’s posts?” We are not allowed to shadow hunt our way through integral forums. We have to clean our own house first. There are specific forums in the critics’ circle where all sorts of criticisms are allowed and encouraged. But threaded discussions in general are not for shadow-boxing. I have a lot of shadow work to do, and am glad to have this community on zaadz where I can learn from people like you two.Love, Nicole |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said Jun 9, 2007, 11:13 AM: |
||
|
Hi Nicole. |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationWhitewave said Jun 11, 2007, 2:59 PM: |
||
|
LOL |
|||
|
|
Re: shadow and meditationNicole said Jun 13, 2007, 8:28 AM: |
||
|
Thanks for the feedback, Patrick and Ww. I understand. We'll keep looking for something that does help then. |
|||

Help



