|
|
God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 16, 2008, 10:47 AM: |
||
|
It's interesting how some folks tend to take the spiritual game very seriously.
However, there is another type of player that, although they recognize it's all a game, they love playing anyway. For those folks the object of the game is simply to continue playing by engaging as many players as possible. The only rule for those players is that there are NO RULES and the game is never-ending. As if there were only one finite way or path to realize the infinite. LOL! Happy Trails! mike S |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 16, 2008, 11:00 AM: |
||
|
Hi Mike, |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!andrew said Nov 16, 2008, 1:06 PM: |
||
|
i'll take a stab at that one nicole….. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 17, 2008, 6:02 AM: |
||
|
In response to Nicole's question as to how we “deepen the dialogue,” I would suggest we not take the dialogue seriously. Because if it's all a ‘game' does it really matter?
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 16, 2008, 11:07 PM: |
||
|
Nicole, I dunno but if Jesus and Buddha and Lao Tzu and Ghandi and Isis and big mom all went to a bar, I'd go there too, buy them all shots, and get them drunk as fuck. and then I'd start singing this — in all seriousness to mike's origional point, type 2 would feel like type 1 doesn't understand what they think they understood, and if they understood, really down to their bootstrings understood, they'd probably talk less, because the more words you use, the less you actually say.
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 17, 2008, 7:49 AM: |
||
|
andrew, Mike, Alan: |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 17, 2008, 9:17 AM: |
||
|
I don't quite agree with myself in that silence is the only, or best, way. : ) But words are imperfect vessels, and with words, any who understand are trying to build a vessel that holds the truth the way a pitcher holds water. How we build these vessels are extremely important. I would also consider here that in a “teacher/student” paradigm, the teacher can and must understand that the student is inseparable from the cosmos/god. And the cosmos/god is inseparable from the student. That means that the student is both already OK and already completely self-directed. Think of the arrogance of jabbering at god… now, if student/god asks a direct question, it is polite and nice and helpful to humbly answer. it is less-so to jabber and assume that the way the ego/teacher/self sees things has to be grafted on to the student/god. No, the student/god is on his or her own journey of transformation, and this must be recognized and respected. As far as I'm concerned, the teacher is a resource only, and it is up to the student to employ this resource, because the path of the student is and must only be dictated by the student, in conscious self-awareness. Even now, I'm not trying to throw out rules… I only speak for myself, and only because I was asked to elaborate. the teacher has explored, and is exploring; and the student has explored, and is exploring, and no one is above another in any way. Better that they dance with each-other in joy than the teacher act all know-it-all-y. as far as this pod, then, and our relationships, jokey seems just fine to me. : ) I still try and be helpful to my cosmos, as my cosmos is helpful to me. Sometimes, the 'part' of the cosmos I help has a name. Sometimes, the 'part' of the cosmos that helps me has a name too. But for goodness sakes I don't go around preaching! har har! preaching suuuucks |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Mr. said Nov 17, 2008, 11:39 PM: |
||
|
I tend to believe that the game is constantly changing and regenerating. It is simultaneously being played by everyone and by one individual. You as an individual play the game amisst billions of others but despite distractions that present themselves, the only important player to you is you. We each walk our own path. All paths lead to the same destination but different beings arrive at it at different times. Each path is like a mystery that unfolds as we travel it. The journey itself is half the fun! |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Eli said Nov 18, 2008, 1:53 AM: |
||
|
Main Entry: |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 18, 2008, 4:51 AM: |
||
|
My thanks to those who have commented. Its interesting that we would look to a conventional definition of ‘game' to uphold the seriousness of our spiritual play. For the serious player my opinions are almost sacrilege. How dare I impugn the sacred. Even for the devout spiritualist there are rules that must not be questioned.
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Bjorn said Nov 18, 2008, 3:47 AM: |
||
|
Eli, So long… |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 18, 2008, 9:13 AM: |
||
|
Things sound so lovely in this thread. I have two points I'd like to raise: the first is to Mr.'s post, which I agreed with completely until the word destination came into play. Destination…. me, I don't believe one exists. I think the destination is the understanding that there's no hotel, or castle, or bright field, or land of plenty, or harem full of virgins at the end of the road, there's only the everlasting road. My other point was to mike, because I believe to a degree, yes, there are rules, but they are only the rules of the interaction of energies within the universe. Due to how the energies interact, the first rule that I believe in is, when one human tries to communicate 'rules' to another human, the first human has inherantly misunderstood the situation, the universe, and the 'rules' in a way that will probably have both of them evolve in ways that are out of alignment with that which they are seeking: enlightenment, superconsciousness, the kingdom of heaven, whatever you want to call it. In truth, our best teachers talk about the 'rules' all the time, but not in such a crude form that equates them with things schoolteachers tell us to keep us sitting in class quietly. : )
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 18, 2008, 11:07 AM: |
||
|
I agree that once we posit a destination we then have an outcome in mind with an associated expectation on experiencing that outcome. This is fine, however, I merely suggest for discussion purposes that once an outcome is expected, other unexpected outcomes might be missed and that would be unfortunate. Yet, this would apply as well to Ramtha's discussion on “superconsciousness.” That too, would be a destination and thus an expected outcome. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 18, 2008, 3:57 PM: |
||
|
ya everyone, this is a cool thread. : ) mike, you asked: But, who determined the rules, God, the universe, us? Rules impose limits on what can or cannot be. Would a limitless God impose limits? Or is God limited? What are the rules of God's game? The rules I speak of can only really be understood when it's clear that god, the universe, and us are fundamentally the same thing. There are no limits either. : ) only evolution. But isn't what we call it significant in determining the game, rules, teams, winners, losers, etc? Joseph Campbell was a man who spent his life studying religions. He went to many inter-faith conferences of clergy and mystics(monks, mostly) and found that while the clergy always had communication issues, the monks always understood each other perfectly well. The clergy were involved mostly with 'rules' or coda to give the people and the monks were about the living experience of, in the language of the thread, 'the game.' In the living practice, there's only one thing, only one name, and the words are insignificant. It's literally all the same thing, and that at the core of all religious is not in conflict with itself. I agree and many seemngly profound rules have been expressed. But does it matter whether they are expressed crudely or profoundly? Of course, the rule passed down for centuries tends to require profundity and 'wisdom' in our teachers, otherwise we would ignore the teachings as not following the rule. But that doesn't necessarily mean the teachings are truth, only that they appear to be profound and wise. crudely or profoundly refers to the words used. It matters only in how well the words communicate the ideas to people. The core that the words are suggesting is untouched, although surely it's clear that in history, 'crude' religious language has a habit of causing incredible amounts of pain and strife. The question though is: do we attribute this to the language, the 'core', or the minds/interpretations/egos who caused the pain and strife? I would agree with you about the teachings, but I've found that more often than not, when the oneness of all things is understood, the old masters do seem quite respectable. : ) A
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Jackie said Nov 18, 2008, 11:03 AM: |
||
|
This is quite the thread, and very passionate, I must say! |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 19, 2008, 8:36 AM: |
||
|
That used to be one of my mom's pet peeves - platypi - as a teacher, she used to get annoyed when words were misused like that. For Latin-derived “us” endings, “i” is an appropriate plural because it follows the Latin declension. But this is not the case here as the “pus” refers to “foot”. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Jackie said Nov 19, 2008, 7:20 PM: |
||
|
Next time I'll pick an animal I can spell all by myself |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Missy said Nov 18, 2008, 12:23 PM: |
||
|
It is really hard for me to think of spirituality as a game….spirituality literally saved my ass!! I have always known God…gone to church, been active in the church community, and, I was dying….All of those years wasted to king alcohol and whatever the extra added chemical of the day was. God would forgive me, my kids would forgive me, everyone would forgive me…what a joke!!! It was not until i dragged my but in to recovery and found spirituality that I was truly forgiven…spirituality allowed me to forgive myself…..I did not really understand spirituality until i heard Spirituality is not for people that are afraid of going to hell, It is for people that have already been there….. I've been there, bought several t-shirts, and I do not want to go back. So, have fun with your little game if you must, but, I can't play….No fuddy duddy here, just a very grateful, growing, hard knock kid. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 19, 2008, 8:51 AM: |
||
|
Though I know “me too” answers can be annoying, I was so impressed by the way you responded to Missy, Andrew, that I just had to thank you for this. I love you both so much! |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Mr. said Nov 18, 2008, 8:57 PM: |
||
|
Missy has an excellent point. There are an awful lot of people who take their belief in God, be it religion or just spirituality, very seriously. Although I agree with Andrew that nothing posted here is meant to be disrespectful, some may take it as being disrespectful. It's a tricky line to walk when trying to playful with what many consider a serious subject. The most we can do is be mindful of how others may view what is posted before posting it. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 19, 2008, 5:22 AM: |
||
|
So are you saying that we should be careful not to disrespect those who are serious? But would that disrespect those who are NOT? |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 19, 2008, 6:10 AM: |
||
|
I don't think conflict is inevitable but I think it is necessary. Like a polishing stone on a diamond, I think it is important that people should be able to support their position, particularly if they are criticising someone elses faith. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 19, 2008, 8:39 AM: |
||
|
Andrew, I'm interested, tell me more about the book please. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 21, 2008, 8:45 AM: |
||
|
Thank you so much, Andrew, for what you sent me from the Lazy Man's Guide to Enlightenment. A Fable Once upon a time there dwelt an old King in a palace. In the center of a golden table in the main hall, there shone a large and magnificent jewel. Each day of the King's life the stone sparkled more resplendently. One day a thief stole the jewel and ran from the palace, hiding in a forest. As he stared with deep joy at the stone, to his amazement the image of the King appeared in it. “I have come to thank you,” said the King. “You have released me from my attachment to Earth. I thought I was freed when I acquired the jewel, but then I learned that I would be released only when I passed it on, with a pure heart, to another. “Each day of my life I polished that stone, until finally this day arrived, when the jewel became so beautiful that you stole it, and I have passed it on, and am released. “The jewel you hold is Understanding. You cannot add to its beauty by hiding it and hinting that you have it, nor yet by wearing it with vanity. Its beauty comes of the consciousness that others have of it. Honor that which gives it beauty.” |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 21, 2008, 9:07 AM: |
||
|
amen. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 9:01 AM: |
||
|
The “instant enlightenment” thing almost happened to me once. I was sitting meditating and suddenly I realized that I was agreeing to suffer, and I decided to stop. then again it wasn't instantaneous at all. I'd already been meditating a lot. then again, imagine looking for something. Imagine the thing you're looking for is right between your shoulder blades, only you don't know it. you look in a forest, you look in the city, you look in the mountains. you look everywhere. you don't find it. you begin to wonder why you can't. but in reality the search is understanding HOW to look, and changing your whole idea of what is and what is not, what a search is and what it is to find. at that point, like in all the children's stories where kids are given a mirror, it's clear that what was searched for was within all the time, and the search was never something external, but an inner movement towards the deepest part of you that was always there, and always whole. Also, about instantaneous… Isis told us that nothing can happen in nature that is outside of nature. Look for instant changes in nature. were they instant, or was there a long build-up that was perhaps unseen? Think of earth quakes… think of volcanoes… evolution evolution evolution
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 19, 2008, 9:34 AM: |
||
|
Excellent insight, Alan, the seemingly instantaneous the culmination of everything before. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 10:13 AM: |
||
|
Thank you! Perhaps in spite of myself, I have a bit more to say on the subject. : ) I think it's an important subject. There's a tradition that's devoted entirely to the conscious evolution that is the oneness of all things, and that is our uplink TO the oneness of all things. In that tradition, there's two kinds of evolutionary progress: red energy and green energy. Sometimes turned into metaphorical lions: red lion and green lion. The red lion represents abrupt, sudden, large-scale changes. The green lion represents small scale, regular, small change. The two always coexist. Humanity, at the moment, tends to ignore the green lion while seeking the red: “the one big score,” “instant enlightenment,” “loose ten pounds in one week with our amazing product.” But how do you make big changes? The bigger the change, the harder it is to “make” it happen. especially with spiritual red lions, however, the metaphor of a radio is a good one. You're the radio: you have to be on the right station. (but who's to say what that station is? Learning to listen to the self is good.) the green lion is turning the dial. It is necessary to be in the right frequency first. Red lions never show up where the green has not expected them.
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 19, 2008, 10:26 AM: |
||
|
However, although I agree that we 'perceive' evolution all around us (an issue of appearances?), evolution asserts a becoming, less so a being. Evolution is more a 'not just yet' as opposed to a 'now.' If I'm searching then what am I looking to find that I don't already have? |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 10:39 AM: |
||
|
But what in the universe is not evolving, growing, expanding? To be is to evolve. to evolve is to be. What happens when a black-belt receives the black-belt? do they stop? Eckharte's solid. : ) I like his stuff. But surely, even if the green lion was outside of him, it was there. If in nothing else than the condition of his life at that moment, that lead to a possibility. This universe, this world, exist in constant flux. this IS impermanence. This IS the reason why attachment is unwise. Forms flow into eachother. Forms change shape. The forms are the dao changing shape, the dance between form and formless. To be one with the dao is to be aware of form and formless, and to be aware of form and formless is to see evolution, growth, and expansion of the universe herself.
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 19, 2008, 11:14 AM: |
||
|
Hi Alan, |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 11:59 AM: |
||
|
: ) yes, it's very fun playing. Here's a bit on religion, to me: it's a centuries-long game of telephone. Someone hits enlightenment, becomes realized, whatever we wish to call it. That person tells others, becomes a teacher. the students tell others, become teachers. eventually, a few generations later (in christianity's case, 200-300 years later) some of the students' students' students decide to write down the accounts they had of the origonal teacher. these accounts are copied and recopied, interpreted and reinterpreted. at one point, a dictator changes the text, ideas and interpretations to make it easier for him to rule with his iron fist. Eventually, they are translated into other languages. in the other languages, the current interpretation determines which definitions of words to use in the new language. For example, jesus's words became “the meek shall inherit the earth.” “the egoless shall inherit the earth” to me is a much better choice of word. But for centuries, english speaking christians haven't been able to make the connection to buddhism that is inherant in this idea. — now lets look at all the major religons at once. lets imagine that they all went through this process, which they did. Therefore, in their messages, we have a lot of phsycic static– the collective interpretations and misunderstandings of centuries of seekers. You also have, beneath the static, the core message. If you look at all religons at once, assuming they are all staticy pictures, it is possible to clear the static away, but only with cross-referencing… finding the core ideas that are in all religons, we can clean up the picture of each religion. The egoless shall inherit the earth. The law of attraction says: as you sow, so shall ye reap, but as sowing happens in the consciousness (which is all we are), right thought and right action are necessary. Through egoless right thought and right action, we can attune ourselves to the dao, which suggests that we go with nature in all things. Jesus agreed with this, and mocked members of the churches of babel for worshipping indoors– far better, he said, to walk in the woods. This is an example. : )
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 6:12 PM: |
||
|
: ) Are you sure I haven't contemplated for hours or days? oh, my! Where did you get that opinion? Did you assume so because we disagree? That'd be unfortunate. Also, if you read my posts, you'll see the whole point is not telling you what I believe. What I believe is as relevant to you as you think it is– in this case, obviously not much. What I was describing was a method by which, with (exactly as you suggest) contemplation and careful meditation, the teachings of the masters can be seen through the centuries that obscured them. How long did you contemplate my words before you decided I was “riding roughshod?” here's another quick example of the links I drew above: Jesus said: “if you think lustful thoughts about your neighbors thoughts, you have already committed adultery in your heart.” It's a kind of harsh sentence, is it not? Personally, I never liked how judgmental that sounds… but after, um, contemplating it for a while, I separated the idea of committing adultery from the judgment that our societies have heaped on the act. And if you assume immediate forgiveness (which Jesus was about anyway) what Jesus is talking about in the context of the quotation is simply “right thought.” 'Keep your thoughts right, because it matters too.' And it really does. Cognitive Behavioral Psychology proves it, really. In love (with everything), Alan
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 6:32 PM: |
||
|
haha, whups! there's a typo above. The quote from jesus is about your neighbor's wife, not your neighbor's thoughts…. sorry!
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Jackie said Nov 19, 2008, 7:22 PM: |
||
|
we gotcha. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Jackie said Nov 19, 2008, 7:16 PM: |
||
|
I agree with you about right thoughts, Alan, and I asked the same question of my Pastor. Being married I needed to know if I was on my way to hell because I couldn't control the fact that naughty ideas pop in - they just happen! |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 20, 2008, 7:09 AM: |
||
|
Hi Jackie, |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 20, 2008, 7:27 AM: |
||
|
It would seem that fear of no direction is a kind of direction - also an understandable fear, Mike. Directionality seems deeply a part of us. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Mr. said Nov 19, 2008, 5:10 PM: |
||
|
Although I believe that what you say or write should be respectful to others beliefs it is good to try and push the envelope to get people to reach beyond their comfort zone. It is reaching beyond our comfort zones that makes us grow. It is important to be careful however (as a pdersonal safety issue) to do things in a respectful manner so as not to piss off someone or some group who takes religion a bit too seriously and marks you for retribution. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 20, 2008, 7:20 AM: |
||
|
Mr and Andrew, thank you. I am very grateful for the way that members like you follow the discussion here so closely and with such concern and attention for the thoughts and feelings of others. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 20, 2008, 10:55 AM: |
||
|
Andrew, |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 20, 2008, 1:58 PM: |
||
|
This was such a nice thread, with such interesting ideas. It's a shame for such things to get diverted because one person accidentally insults others. so, for accidentally insulting andrew and anyone else, I apologize. Please note that I may occasionally be unintentionally insulting in the future. As it was unintentional, I cannot promise it won't happen again. Please know I also stand by everything I wrote, including the post about not completely understanding what I said that was so offensive. Can we get back to the fun part? : -)
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 20, 2008, 4:34 PM: |
||
|
Andrew, |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 20, 2008, 6:04 PM: |
||
|
if you're considered a heritic… well, why are different viewpoints so offensive? I mean, you didn't even really get what I was saying… First: I am saying that Meek and Egoless are for intents and purposes synonyms, in that they share some meanings enough to be, in specific circumstances, interchangable. Second, here it is again: the EGOLESS/MEEK shall inherit the earth. The difference between the two versions of translation is not a matter of changing the scriptures, it's a matter of translating the scriptures different ways from one language to another. I think the first language is ancient aramaic. (I can't remember if that's actually it, but I think so.) as in any translation, translating from ancient aramaic to english is not exact, because works don't mean the same things or have the same associations. In fact, translation is an art in and of itself, not a science. some grad-schools teach 'theories of translation' classes. this wouldn't be possible if there wasn't some ability and necessity to choose between words when going from one language to another. As we all know, sentences have nuances. Nuances usually do not get translated. So again, what I believe is that “egoless” is probably a better translation of the scripture into english, at least right now when the word meek has been misunderstood for centuries. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 20, 2008, 6:52 PM: |
||
|
G'day Alan, |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 20, 2008, 7:25 PM: |
||
|
Thank you, we can now agree on a working definition of meek. my meek=egoless statement still applies as everything therein can also be ascribed to egolessness. is this the part of the 'dispute' where we pretend to be disagreeing even if we aren't disagreeing anymore? : ) I like that part. But I like ending the disagreement entirely better. Seeing as we are now debating the definition (and perhaps the validity) of the word meek, it does seem that it is a fair and debatable question to ask. Not an attack on the bible. Quoting a favorite expert on the theory proves it… it's at least enough of an issue for an expert to write on. I think that brings us out of the woods, yes? Anyway, I was saying… it is possible to make all the major religions fundamentally agree, instead of fundamentally disagree. It begins with the mindset that says: the universe is alive, and god is the alive universe. OR with the mindset that says: all humans have the same soul/spiritual apparatus, so it is likely they were all using different languages, phrasings and ideas to point their metaphorical fingers at the same moon.
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 20, 2008, 8:48 PM: |
||
|
it has escaped my notice. enemies? I don't really vibrate that way…. I believe everything is one. Therefore, no one has enemies, we only have misunderstandings with each other. everything else I understand and completely share your sentiments. but I would add that we would do well respect all of each other's opinions, even the ones that initially seem in conflict with our own. This means not accusing them of things… To become offended is a choice we all make or don't make. To recognize that all opinions are valid would be to hear even the most 'horrid' idea and not take it personally, to react with it in some way outside of anger. perhaps this energy is needed in these dialogs most. Otherwise, we create a tension-filled situation where it didn't need to be. |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Albert said Nov 19, 2008, 8:00 PM: |
||
|
Who knows what the Sanskrit Word “Kridaratnam” means? |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 20, 2008, 7:11 AM: |
||
|
Albert, I really appreciate your second link and I think I would enjoy the first - except it doesn't work. Would you fix it, please, so we can see what it says? |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Albert said Nov 20, 2008, 7:19 AM: |
||
|
Nicole, It should work and was originally posted for the Play Pod. Albert |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Nicole said Nov 20, 2008, 7:23 AM: |
||
|
Ah, it's in the same thread as the other post, higher up! I see it now, and it is even more delightful than I hoped. Thank you. For example, this part: |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!mike S said Nov 20, 2008, 10:40 AM: |
||
|
As i read the essay Albert linked to I thought, 'okay another merging of the child-like paradigm of play into the adult play paradigm.' but then I came to this: |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Albert said Nov 21, 2008, 11:13 AM: |
||
|
Mike, |
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 22, 2008, 12:01 AM: |
||
|
I love this all! I especially love the heightening of the discussion on play, with that wonderful description of universal play. Oh that feels right! And to feel it, you have to play it. If you play it long enough, you'll feel it. It's acutely inevitable. One thing that strikes me is the intense similarity between the description of 'universal play' and actual child's play. In both, all experiences are all and all both a vehicle and summed-up-to growth. In both, growth is the out-and-out goal: every child knows they are becoming older, becoming an adult, growing: becoming is the natural state of a child, and so they don't focus on it. They just know it's happening. In both, there's a fundamental aliveness, a connection, a trust. In both, I'd say there's intense submission the child to the will of the parents, the 'universal' to the universe itself. And in both, there's both a preconscious and conscious understanding that growth is the name of the game. Growth is everything. As 'adults,' when a child soberly tells us that “when I was six, I used to be afraid of the dark, but now I'm not afraid of the dark anymore.” usually we smile at the cuteness… How much better it'd be if we could say: “oh yeah? I know how you feel… when I was 34, I used to be afraid of becoming poor, but now I'm not afraid anymore. You did a great job growing!” heheheh, some say the children will lead us.
|
|||
|
|
Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!Alan said Nov 20, 2008, 9:48 AM: |
||
|
Jackie, Thank you for your lovely comments! Right thought indeed is important. And you also raise another point, which is that most of our historical teachers themselves were occasionally responding to temporary, contemporary conditions that in almost all cases don't exist anymore. Still, there are many contemporary condition responses that are pretty universal… I feel that way about Jesus's spiel on the Priests of Babel, for example. : ) Nicole: You're awesome. Andrew: I'm sorry, but I don't really know what you're talking about. I mean: I hear what you're saying but it doesn't really compute. Sometimes, I say things, and then people think I said entirely different things. And then people tell me that I said this and that and I'm wrong for this and that reason and I go: “Huh?” For example, I have no idea who you think I've disrespected by stating my perspective as plainly and honestly as I can, but as far as I'm concerned, their assumed offense has more to do with them than me. I believe what I said was logical, based on more or less accepted facts, and inclusive and loving of all walks of faith. I said what I said in this spirit. It really has been many centuries since the old masters did their thing, and the messages have been interpreted and reinterpreted. I didn't say a word about the bible that was negative. The bible is fine with me. Like everything, it literally IS the consciousness that we often call god. Why would I be angry at it? Doesn't compute, mate. : ) I respect all who walk, swim, and exist. I love all who do so. I love you too. hello! A
|
|||

Help





