Explore
Gaia Soulmates
down  About This Group
God Pod or Life, the Universe and Everything

A creative, open and playful discussion group on God, spirituality, art, politics… in other words, on life, the universe and everything. Yes, the answer is 42 but what is the question? All are welcome, and invited to engage in  dialogue with love, mindfulness, and respect.
down  About This Room
Are you drawn to silence and finding God there? This is the place where we muse upon the ins and outs of mysticism and being a contemplative, in a practical sense.
down  Room Activity
Lizzyl : Seeker of Truth and Harmony
Lizzyl posted a reply to the conversation "A 'Disney" moment?!" ()
Nicole : wakingdreamer
Nicole posted a reply to the conversation "A 'Disney" moment?!" ()
Taikunping : Crystal Truth
Taikunping posted a reply to the conversation "A 'Disney" moment?!" ()
Lizzyl : Seeker of Truth and Harmony
Lizzyl posted a reply to the conversation "A 'Disney" moment?!" ()
Nicole : wakingdreamer
Nicole posted a reply to the conversation "To have a teacher or not" ()
Rev. Travis Eneix : Philosopher-lite & Self-Inquirer
Rev. Travis Eneix posted a reply to the conversation "To have a teacher or not" ()
down  Group Grapevine
Taikunping : Crystal Truth
Taikunping cant post on the beauty thread, get the sorry message in the posting box Nicole! (16 days ago)
heemes : Philosophy Minor, Life Major
heemes is a grapevine groupie! LOL (16 days ago)
Nicole : wakingdreamer
Nicole welcome, sea-sh-elle! hugs! (1 month ago)
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?
Resultset_previousprevious thread | next threadResultset_next
threaded | unthreaded | newest first


  mike S : Hahaaaa!

God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 16, 2008, 10:47 AM:

 

It's interesting how some folks tend to take the spiritual game very seriously.

You see them here in Gaia quite often informing others about what “spirituality” is all about; what you must do or not do, say or not say. They tend to apply strict rules to the spiritual game, and woe be it, to any who break with those rules. (no doubt the rules were learned from some teacher somewhere).

They don't take kindly to conflict or disagreement of any kind (especially when it conflicts with the principles they espouse as “the truth”). When you do present an opposing viewpoint, they often attack you personally attempting to highlight any character defect that may have shown through your typed words (because obviously those who do not play by the rules must be a deviant of some kind)


Nevertheless, it is of the utmost importance that you take the rules seriously.

The problem with rules is that they tend to make the game finite, allowing for little change. Rules demand conformity to some teacher or text and they tend to box you into a belief system that allows little freedom of movement (the irony is that many of these serious dogmas actually claim that they will “set you free”).


But for the serious player, there must be rules because there must be winners and losers that we can easily identify. Of course, to be a winner in the spirituality game means you have attained the desired outcome. For some that outcome is simply to attain the title of teacher, guru, yogi, etc, etc. Obviously to win that title you must play by the rules that your guru followed, else you will not win.

Therefore, all the rules are fairly evident (though often unspoken) and based on past precedent. In other words, to be “awakened” like your guru, you must adhere to the strict practices and procedures as set forth by your guru's guru and his guru before him, etc, etc. Those that play the game by these rules may one day be granted the title of “awakened” (yet the rules do state that there can only be a limited number of winners) and will be afforded the reverence that the title deserves (based on the rules for the un-awakened).


However, there is another type of player that, although they recognize it's all a game, they love playing anyway. For those folks the object of the game is simply to continue playing by engaging as many players as possible. The only rule for those players is that there are NO RULES and the game is never-ending.


As if there were only one finite way or path to realize the infinite. LOL!


Happy Trails!

mike S

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 16, 2008, 11:00 AM:

 

Hi Mike,

I think we must have been writing our posts at the same time.

Given our very different perspectives on spirituality in this group, how do you think we can continue to deepen our dialogue?

Love,

Nicole

  andrew : ~SmAsHInG dUaLiTy~

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

andrew said Nov 16, 2008, 1:06 PM:

 

i'll take a stab at that one nicole…..

it seems to me that if we are talking about spirituality defined as some unseen metaphysical presence then i can't see how humanity can ever come to a collective consensus on said unseen metaphysical presence or lack of. it seems obvious to me that this is true because if it wasn't there would only be one spiritual belief system on the planet that all would share without coercion or division. this is again, obviously not the case. now, if there were such a thing as an invisible metaphysical presence, theoretically it could reveal itself to all people overtly at some point so as to end all speculation, division and conflict. until such a time, my belief is that humans must learn to phrase their spiritual beliefs and faith in spiritual hypothesis, thereby allowing a sense of possibility but conceding the possibility of error too, at the same time. now this goes for all you eastern mystics also, who can be as dogmatic as anyone.

let me give you an exp.- take brother mikes or brother zack's writings and ideas on spiritual metaphysics- i really enjoy reading about these ideas and consider them working spiritual hypothesis. i have no idea whether they are ultimately ontologically true but i don't discard or denigrate the ideas and hell, i have a few of my own. let's suppose that somehow in a way that we simply cannot understand that the spirit of all things somehow manifested into human form 2000 years ago. it's my contention that this is not impossible and said spirit could and will eventually reveal itself to all the nations of the world with the net effect being the ushering in of a 'golden age' for all humanity. in other words, all the nations of the world will come to understand the truth, beauty and goodness of god thru the messiah figure and will willingly accept this truth as it is revealed to all. those who may for whatever reason refuse this truth ,beauty and goodness will be dealt with in a fair and just means in a similar way that any loving parent would usually chastise a child for correction for its overall  greater good. this idea of correction seems just a logical and reasonable (if not more so) then the working hypothesis of justice thru  the idea of reincarnation which may or may not be true……..
i hope this helps bothers and sisters…….

  mike S : Hahaaaa!

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 17, 2008, 6:02 AM:

 

In response to Nicole's question as to how we “deepen the dialogue,” I would suggest we not take the dialogue seriously. Because if it's all a ‘game' does it really matter?


Once you take it seriously, then there is the tendency to apply rules to make it a serious game and we refer to that as “religion.” Religion tends to obstruct the possibility of ‘surprise,' because when you play by the rules you EXPECT an outcome and there's no surprise in that.

Of course, egos require rules to offset the potential for surprise because rules allow for “interpretation.' God forbid we should attain some ‘awakening' or ‘enlightenment' episode and not have the rules available (from some ‘teacher' or text) for which to interpret it AS ‘awakening.' LOL! That would suck, dude….


I have no problem with spiritual games since I enjoy participating immensely. Problem is for many folks it is NOT a game, but deadly serious. How can you be surprised, if you're so damn serious?


Nicole, what I like about your pod is that you have allowed for the ongoing possibility of surprise. Like how you picked moderators, many that are highly divergent in perspective and opinion, as if to say “surprise me!” Other pods take this very seriously.


I belong to several pods and I resist commenting in many because, although the rules are not written (although many are) they are strongly implied. Many pod's take their rules very seriously and, like a cloudy day, the light of surprise is obstructed.


Obviously, this opinion does not make me a popular person, especially with the serious players (and they have let me know this in no uncertain terms. LOL!). They don't expect to be surprised and so they don't like it when they ARE.

If we want to deepen the dialogue, simply deepen the opportunity for surprise. Expect to be suprised!

Peace Angels,
mike S

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 16, 2008, 11:07 PM:

 

Nicole, 


I dunno but if Jesus and Buddha and Lao Tzu and Ghandi and Isis and big mom all went to a bar, I'd go there too, buy them all shots, and get them drunk as fuck. 

and then I'd start singing this


in all seriousness to mike's origional point, 

type 2 would feel like type 1 doesn't understand what they think they understood, and if they understood, really down to their bootstrings understood, they'd probably talk less, because the more words you use, the less you actually say. 

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 17, 2008, 7:49 AM:

 

andrew, Mike, Alan:

andrew, right, it's a given that we will never all agree. I was just hoping for pointers on how we could improve the dialogue here. Any thoughts?

Mike, I still believe there is a method to the apparent madness with which I chose my mods! :) Though most of my mods doubt it, apparently! LOL! And even if it is a game, a game can be played better, right?

Alan, I am constantly torn between the truth of what you imply about silence being ultimately the only way to discourse about ultimate reality and the very human desire to explore all the nooks and crannies of what we think we see with our intellect. I appreciate that you tend to take a more playful approach, but do you have any other suggestions?

Love,

Nicole

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 17, 2008, 9:17 AM:

 

I don't quite agree with myself in that silence is the only, or best, way.  : )


But words are imperfect vessels, and with words, any who understand are trying to build a vessel that holds the truth the way a pitcher holds water.  How we build these vessels are extremely important.  

I would also consider here that in a “teacher/student” paradigm, the teacher can and must understand that the student is inseparable from the cosmos/god.  And the cosmos/god is inseparable from the student.  That means that the student is both already OK and already completely self-directed.  Think of the arrogance of jabbering at god… now, if student/god asks a direct question, it is polite and nice and helpful to humbly answer.  it is less-so to jabber and assume that the way the ego/teacher/self sees things has to be grafted on to the student/god.  No, the student/god is on his or her own journey of transformation, and this must be recognized and respected.  As far as I'm concerned, the teacher is a resource only,  and it is up to the student to employ this resource, because the path of the student is and must only be dictated by the student, in conscious self-awareness.  

Even now, I'm not trying to throw out rules… I only speak for  myself, and only because I was asked to elaborate.  

the teacher has explored, and is exploring; and the student has explored, and is exploring, and no one is above another in any way.  

Better that they dance with each-other in joy than the teacher act all know-it-all-y.

as far as this pod, then, and our relationships, jokey seems just fine to me.  : )  I still try and be helpful to my cosmos, as my cosmos is helpful to me.  Sometimes, the 'part' of the cosmos I help has a name.  Sometimes, the 'part' of the cosmos that helps me has a name too.  

But for goodness sakes I don't go around preaching!  har har!  preaching suuuucks

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Mr. said Nov 17, 2008, 11:39 PM:

 

I tend to believe that the game is constantly changing and regenerating. It is simultaneously being played by everyone and by one individual. You as an individual play the game amisst billions of others but despite distractions that present themselves, the only important player to you is you. We each walk our own path. All paths lead to the same destination but different beings arrive at it at different times. Each path is like a mystery that unfolds as we travel it. The journey itself  is half the fun!

  Eli : A Friend

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Eli said Nov 18, 2008, 1:53 AM:

 

A Game ????



Go to homepage.


Main Entry:
1game            Listen to the pronunciation of 1game
Pronunciation:
\ˈgām\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English, from Old English gamen; akin to Old High German gaman amusement
Date:
before 12th century
1 a (1): activity engaged in for diversion or amusement : play (2): the equipment for a game b: often derisive or mocking jesting : fun , sport <make game of a nervous player>2 a: a procedure or strategy for gaining an end : tactic b: an illegal or shady scheme or maneuver : racket3 a (1): a physical or mental competition conducted according to rules with the participants in direct opposition to each other (2): a division of a larger contest (3): the number of points necessary to win (4): points scored in certain card games (as in all fours) by a player whose cards count up the highest (5): the manner of playing in a contest (6): the set of rules governing a game (7): a particular aspect or phase of play in a game or sport <a football team's kicking game> bplural : organized athletics c (1): a field of gainful activity : line <the newspaper game> (2): any activity undertaken or regarded as a contest involving rivalry, strategy, or struggle <the dating game> <the game of politics> ; also : the course or period of such an activity <got into aviation early in the game> (3): area of expertise : specialty 3 <comedy is not my game>4 a (1): animals under pursuit or taken in hunting ; especially : wild animals hunted for sport or food (2): the flesh of game animals barchaic : pluck c: a target or object especially of ridicule or attack -often used in the phrase fair game synonyms see fun

  mike S : Hahaaaa!

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 18, 2008, 4:51 AM:

 

My thanks to those who have commented.
 

Its interesting that we would look to a conventional definition of ‘game' to uphold the seriousness of our spiritual play. For the serious player my opinions are almost sacrilege. How dare I impugn the sacred. Even for the devout spiritualist there are rules that must not be questioned.


Nevertheless, The definition as presented by Webster has all the ingredients of the modern spiritual game. It is often engaged for “amusement” or “diversion” (since how many of us live in a monastery or ashram like many serious players) and is often a very shady “racket” with numerous racketeers (gurus, priests, saints, teachers, masters, etc).

It has numerous strict rules and often involves a great deal of suffering (for many suffering, sacrifice and burden are paramount and the most important rule of play). Of course, there is also a great deal of “derisive or making jests” by the competing teams (Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Atheist, Advaitist, Integralist, New Age, etc, etc) and there is always the institutional field of “expertise,” codified either through text or “lineage” and expressed by those chosen as expert by a consensus of serious players (and of course all serious players want the title of expert, teacher, master, ambassador, spokesperson, etc, so it behooves them to identify other masters who can pass on the title to them. This is called the guru-master racket).


However, I love playing the spiritual game as well (it's “fun”) and, therefore, I have no intention of stopping play as I revel in it. For me the problem are the rules we tend to set depending on what team you play on. Many pods throughout Gaia adhere to such rules and thus, the play is no longer surprising, but serious players get points for adhering to the rules. Problem is this tends to limit the players who wish to bend the rules and so, they tend to move on.


I'm all for rules, since, in the game of life, we play by rules. The problem is when the rules become rigid and finite, allowing no transformation or transcendence from the rules. This tends to result in stagnation (and little opportunity for surprise) because folks tend to forget that it is a game that they have willingly chosen to play. Once you forget that you are playing a game, you become a serious player following serious rules that must not be changed. Centuries of war have erupted in just such a way.

Actually, I enjoy playing the game with serious players, but as indicated in this thread, they don't like playing with me.

Peace Angels,
mike S

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 18, 2008, 2:04 AM:

 

Mike S, you sound like the schoolyard bully.

If people want to treat things of the Spirit seriously, you're not going to stop them.

So there!!!!


An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  Bjorn : One Mind

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Bjorn said Nov 18, 2008, 3:47 AM:

 

Eli,

How interesting! It definitely throws a light upon in what manner and in what spirit communication is conducted.

But what I find most fasinating is that all people already knows this. It's just that we want to have an outlet, an escape clause if things get too burdensome. A game gives us room to play, and we can leave at any time.


So long…

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 18, 2008, 9:13 AM:

 

Things sound so lovely in this thread.  


I have two points I'd like to raise:

the first is to Mr.'s post, which I agreed with completely until the word destination came into play.  Destination…. me, I don't believe one exists.  I think the destination is the understanding that there's no hotel, or castle, or bright field, or land of plenty, or harem full of virgins at the end of the road, there's only the everlasting road.  

My  other point was to  mike, because I believe to a degree, yes, there are rules, but they are only the rules of the interaction of energies within the universe.  Due to how the energies interact, the first rule that I believe in is, when one human tries to communicate 'rules' to another human, the first human has inherantly misunderstood the situation, the universe, and the 'rules' in a way that will probably have both of them evolve in ways that are out of alignment with that which they are seeking: enlightenment, superconsciousness, the kingdom of heaven, whatever you want to call it.

In truth, our best teachers talk about the 'rules' all the time, but not in such a crude form that equates them with things schoolteachers tell us to keep us sitting in class quietly.  : ) 

  mike S : Hahaaaa!

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 18, 2008, 11:07 AM:

 

I agree that once we posit a destination we then have an outcome in mind with an associated expectation on experiencing that outcome. This is fine, however, I merely suggest for discussion purposes that once an outcome is expected, other unexpected outcomes might be missed and that would be unfortunate. Yet, this would apply as well to Ramtha's discussion on “superconsciousness.” That too, would be a destination and thus an expected outcome.

“there are rules, but they are only the rules of the interaction of energies within the universe.”

But, who determined the rules, God, the universe, us? Rules impose limits on what can or cannot be. Would a limitless God impose limits? Or is God limited? What are the rules of God's game?

“…enlightenment, superconsciousness, the kingdom of heaven, whatever you want to call it.”

But isn't what we call it significant in determining the game, rules, teams, winners, losers, etc?

In truth, our best teachers talk about the 'rules' all the time, but not in such a crude form that equates them with things schoolteachers tell us to keep us sitting in class quietly.

I agree and many seemngly profound rules have been expressed. But does it matter whether they are expressed crudely or profoundly?
Of course, the rule passed down for centuries tends to require profundity and 'wisdom'  in our teachers, otherwise we would ignore the teachings as not following the rule. But that doesn't necessarily mean the teachings are truth, only that they appear to be profound and wise.

Great comments!

Thanks,
mike S

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 18, 2008, 3:57 PM:

 

ya everyone, this is a cool thread.  : )


mike, you asked:

But, who determined the rules, God, the universe, us? Rules impose limits on what can or cannot be. Would a limitless God impose limits? Or is God limited? What are the rules of God's game?

The rules I speak of can only really be understood when it's clear that god, the universe, and us are fundamentally the same thing.   There are no limits either. : )  only evolution. 

But isn't what we call it significant in determining the game, rules, teams, winners, losers, etc? 

Joseph Campbell was a man who spent his life studying religions.  He went to many inter-faith conferences of clergy and mystics(monks, mostly) and found that while the clergy always had communication issues, the monks always understood each other perfectly well.  

The clergy were involved mostly with 'rules' or coda to give the people and the monks were about the living experience of, in the language of the thread, 'the game.'  In the living practice, there's only one thing, only one name, and the words are insignificant.  It's literally all the same thing, and that at the core of all religious is not in conflict with itself.  

I agree and many seemngly profound rules have been expressed. But does it matter whether they are expressed crudely or profoundly?
Of course, the rule passed down for centuries tends to require profundity and 'wisdom'  in our teachers, otherwise we would ignore the teachings as not following the rule. But that doesn't necessarily mean the teachings are truth, only that they appear to be profound and wise. 


crudely or profoundly refers to the words used.  It matters only in how well the words communicate the ideas to people.  The core that the words are suggesting is untouched, although surely it's clear that in history, 'crude' religious language has a habit of causing incredible amounts of pain and strife.  The question though is: do we attribute this to the language, the 'core', or the minds/interpretations/egos who caused the pain and strife?

I would agree with you about the teachings, but I've found that more often than not, when the oneness of all things is understood, the old masters do seem quite respectable.  : )

A

  Jackie : Protector of the Innocent

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Jackie said Nov 18, 2008, 11:03 AM:

 

This is quite the thread, and very passionate, I must say!

Just don't forget that whoever you believe created us in one way or another had a sense of humor.  We see examples of it in our daily lives.  Would he/she/it have created penguins and playtapusses (whoa on the spelling of that one!), or helped give some on the idea of pinatas and balloons at parties?

Be careful about being too serious and too set in your ways, or you don't get nice surprises (think presents).  You end up getting horrible shocks (think having your house toliet papered by crazy teenagers), when it turns out you were way off base.

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 18, 2008, 4:51 PM:

 

Platypus, the plural is either platypus or platypuses.

When I went to school they were referred to as playpi, but with the invention of the wheel and fire, that's gone out of fashion.

An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 19, 2008, 8:36 AM:

 

That used to be one of my mom's pet peeves - platypi - as a teacher, she used to get annoyed when words were misused like that. For Latin-derived “us” endings, “i” is an appropriate plural because it follows the Latin declension. But this is not the case here as the “pus” refers to “foot”.

So, good thing they gave up on it, my friend! Less teachers will get high blood pressure over it :)

Hugs,

Nicole

  Jackie : Protector of the Innocent

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Jackie said Nov 19, 2008, 7:20 PM:

 

Next time I'll pick an animal I can spell all by myself
=)

And yes, 52 is SOOOO old.  I am even surprised that you can handle all this new-fangled technology, dear Andrew!

:rolls eyes:

Lovingly,
Jackie

  Missy : blessed survivor

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Missy said Nov 18, 2008, 12:23 PM:

 

It is really hard for me to think of spirituality as a game….spirituality literally saved my ass!!  I have always known God…gone to church, been active in the church community, and, I was dying….All of those years wasted to king alcohol and whatever the extra added chemical of the day was.  God would forgive me, my kids would forgive me, everyone would forgive me…what a joke!!!  It was not until i dragged my but in to recovery and found spirituality that I was truly forgiven…spirituality allowed me to forgive myself…..I did not really understand spirituality until i heard Spirituality is not for people that are afraid of going to hell, It is for people that have already been there….. I've been there, bought several t-shirts, and I do not want to go back.  So, have fun with your little game if you must, but, I can't play….No fuddy duddy here, just a very grateful, growing, hard knock kid.

I agree with Mr., however….half the fun is the journey…I know where I'm going, I just finally am learning to have an absolute ball while I'm trudging the path.  I can be spiritual and very silly, but, I can not play with my spirituality.  :-)

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 18, 2008, 4:45 PM:

 

Missy, I don't think there is anyone here that doesn't realise there is a serious aspect to the Spiritual path.

Nor do I believe that anyone is being disrespectful.

But there are some issues that have to be approached in a light hearted manner to be able to share differences in the way Spirit has been revealed to individuals, without resorting to arguments or fighting.

God know enough blood has been shed over religious differences.

An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 19, 2008, 8:51 AM:

 

Though I know “me too” answers can be annoying, I was so impressed by the way you responded to Missy, Andrew, that I just had to thank you for this. I love you both so much!

Hugs,

Nicole

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Mr. said Nov 18, 2008, 8:57 PM:

 

Missy has an excellent point. There are an awful lot of people who take their belief in God, be it religion or just spirituality, very seriously. Although I agree with Andrew that nothing posted here is meant to be disrespectful, some may take it as being disrespectful. It's a tricky line to walk when trying to playful with what many consider a serious subject. The most we can do is be mindful of how others may view what is posted before posting it.

  mike S : Hahaaaa!

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 19, 2008, 5:22 AM:

 

So are you saying that we should be careful not to disrespect those who are serious? But would that disrespect those who are NOT?

In fact, it does seem that serious players get a great deal more respect than non-serious players.

Maybe this is because the world tends to teach “no pain, no gain” and we have that conditioning imbedded in our minds. Therefore, we have little respect for those whose spiritual path does not convey that they have somehow sacrificed and struggled. We don't like slackers!

I suppose as long as there are serious and non-serious players, there will always be conflict between those two teams.

Peace Angels,
mike S

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 19, 2008, 5:48 AM:

 

Hi Mike, dabbling with semantics for a change?

I don't think conflict is inevitable but I think it is necessary.  Like a polishing stone on a diamond, I think it is important that people should be able to support their position, particularly if they are criticising someone elses faith.

I'm astonished at how precious some people are when, having berated someone else, you ask them a question and your accused of picking a fight, as a snow job for the fact they cannot support their own argument.

An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  mike S : Hahaaaa!

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 19, 2008, 6:10 AM:

 

I don't think conflict is inevitable but I think it is necessary.  Like a polishing stone on a diamond, I think it is important that people should be able to support their position, particularly if they are criticising someone elses faith.

Yes and I'm no stranger to this idea of the need for conflict. I have been on many spiritual paths, from chanting in the ashram while pouring ghee over the Buddha, to staring at a wall in the monastery while somehow slaps me on the back with a whisk broom.

So why can't we simply dump our butts on the cushion and attain instant enlightenment? why go through all this sacrifice and struggle? My general thesis, which I don't believe disrespects anyone's path, is that there is no possibility of that since it is NOT expected and if you don't expect it's coming how can you be open to it the instant it arrives (whatever 'it' is). No, what we do expect is many years of serious struggle and sacrifice and the expected outcome will be ours. I'm not saying this is wrong or right. But could this teaching obstruct NOW?

I simply ask, why would we expect that? Why do we believe it is necessary? Who decided that we should take those rules seriously? God? The Absolute? Universal Consciousness?

Peace Angels,
mike S

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 19, 2008, 6:25 AM:

 

My favourite read in that respect and I've mentioned it before, is “The Lazy Mans Guide to Enlightenment”, by Thaddeus Golas.

But noone paved the way to my door when I mentioned it then, and I doubt anyone will now.

The principle of “Enlightenment” is so simple you need help to misunderstand it.

(Did you REALLY take a flogging?)

An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 19, 2008, 8:39 AM:

 

Andrew, I'm interested, tell me more about the book please.

Mike, it sounds like your search was really intense. What was the turning point for you to bring you to your current perspective?

Love,

Nicole

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 21, 2008, 8:45 AM:

 

Thank you so much, Andrew, for what you sent me from the Lazy Man's Guide to Enlightenment.

I really enjoyed this introductory story and the rest would make a great basis for a discussion - I'll start another thread:

A Fable

Once upon a time there dwelt an old King in a palace. In the center of a golden table in the main hall, there shone a large and magnificent jewel. Each day of the King's life the stone sparkled more resplendently.

One day a thief stole the jewel and ran from the palace, hiding in a forest. As he stared with deep joy at the stone, to his amazement the image of the King appeared in it.

“I have come to thank you,” said the King. “You have released me from my attachment to Earth. I thought I was freed when I acquired the jewel, but then I learned that I would be released only when I passed it on, with a pure heart, to another.

“Each day of my life I polished that stone, until finally this day arrived, when the jewel became so beautiful that you stole it, and I have passed it on, and am released.

“The jewel you hold is Understanding. You cannot add to its beauty by hiding it and hinting that you have it, nor yet by wearing it with vanity. Its beauty comes of the consciousness that others have of it. Honor that which gives it beauty.”

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 21, 2008, 9:07 AM:

 

amen.

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 9:01 AM:

 

The “instant enlightenment” thing almost happened to me once.  I was sitting meditating and suddenly I realized that I was agreeing to suffer, and I decided to stop.  


then again it wasn't instantaneous at all.  I'd already been meditating a lot.  

then again, imagine looking for something.  Imagine the thing you're looking for is right between your shoulder blades, only you don't know it.  
you look in a forest, you look in the city, you look in the mountains.  you look everywhere.  

you don't find it.  you begin to wonder why you can't.

but in reality the search is understanding HOW to look, and changing your whole idea of what is and what is not, what a search is and what it is to find.  at that point, like in all the children's stories where kids are given a mirror, it's clear that what was searched for was within all the time, and the search was never something external, but an inner movement towards the deepest part of you that was always there, and always whole.  

Also, about instantaneous… Isis told us that nothing can happen in nature that is outside of nature.  Look for instant changes in nature.  were they instant, or was there a long build-up that was perhaps unseen?  Think of earth quakes… think of volcanoes…

evolution evolution evolution

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 19, 2008, 9:34 AM:

 

Excellent insight, Alan, the seemingly instantaneous the culmination of everything before.

Love,

Nicole

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 10:13 AM:

 

Thank you!


Perhaps in spite of myself, I have a bit more to say on the subject.  : )  I think it's an important subject.  

There's a tradition that's devoted entirely to the conscious evolution that is the oneness of all things, and that is our uplink TO the oneness of all things.  

In that tradition, there's two kinds of evolutionary progress: red energy and green energy.  Sometimes turned into metaphorical lions: red lion and green lion. 

The red lion represents abrupt, sudden, large-scale changes.  The green lion represents small scale, regular, small change.  

The two always coexist.  Humanity, at the moment, tends to ignore the green lion while seeking the red: “the one big score,” “instant enlightenment,” “loose ten pounds in one week with our amazing product.”  

But how do you make big changes?  The bigger the change, the harder it is to “make” it happen.  

especially with spiritual red lions, however, the metaphor of a radio is a good one.  You're the radio: you have to be on the right station.  (but who's to say what that station is?  Learning to listen to the self is good.)  

the green lion is turning the dial.  It is necessary to be in the right frequency first.  Red lions never show up where the green has not expected them.  

  mike S : Hahaaaa!

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 19, 2008, 10:26 AM:

 

However, although I agree that we 'perceive' evolution all around us (an issue of appearances?), evolution asserts a becoming, less so a being. Evolution is more a 'not just yet' as opposed to a 'now.' If I'm searching then what am I looking to find that I don't already have?

If I consider my spiritual path part of my evolution or becoming, could I miss NOW? Or is it possible to incoporate a being and a becoming, which would be paradoxical because for most, we are either there or NOT there (based on whatever spiritual outcome identified as 'there'). Eckhart Tolle claims to have had one of those spontaneous moments of clarity without any preparation. Problem is the guy then got all serious about it and went about setting rules telling everyone else how to correctly prepare for NOW. HA!

Nicole, I have always embraced my 'doubt' rather than seeking out a spiritual anchor (teacher or path) for which to keep from drifting all over the place. Currently the “perspective” is more of a drift, but even more about exploring the fear that my meaningless drifting might cause me, since the 'self' requires anchoring. I tenuosly sense the answer is in the fear of having no direction whatsoever (but then some might say that's a direction, too).

Peace Angels,
mike S

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 10:39 AM:

 

But what in the universe is not evolving, growing, expanding?  To be is to evolve.  to evolve is to be.  


What happens when a black-belt receives the black-belt?  do they stop?

Eckharte's solid.  : )  I like his stuff.  But surely, even if the green lion was outside of him, it was there.  If in nothing else than the condition of his life at that moment, that lead to a possibility.  

This universe, this world, exist in constant flux.  this IS impermanence.  This IS the reason why attachment is unwise.  

Forms flow into eachother.  Forms change shape.  The forms are the dao changing shape, the dance between form and formless.  

To be one with the dao is to be aware of form and formless, and to be aware of form and formless is to see evolution, growth, and expansion of the universe herself.

  mike S : Hahaaaa!

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 19, 2008, 11:14 AM:

 

Hi Alan,

Love your thinking, dude!

But what in the universe is not evolving, growing, expanding?  To be is to evolve.  to evolve is to be.  

Yes, and that does seem to be a rule of “existing, and of course we all seem to play by that rule for the most part. But if the universe is in your head, then who set the rule? In addition if the rule is impermanence and all is in flux, what has determined that this flux or impermanence is moving toward something at all, let alone toward something that is 'evolved' to more than what it was before. Maybe all spirituality/religion is merely a product of conventional wisdom which posits that evolution is good, thus we look for the signs of what has never existed. Of course, we only know evolution from sensory data, but then who trusts that! or is sensory perception a rule of play.

We can play the game by any rules we choose. Or are there specific finite rules that must be followed to attain the infinite? 
However, once we decide that we must conform to some rules and not others, we have defined the  game and, once we choose to take any rule seriously the game is finite. It's fixed and we may not allow other rules to even be considered. If evolution is the rule then are we limited by that rule? Must we 'evolve'? or is there some other way? Once you posit evolution, are you then victim to 'time'? If we posit that evolution is the only way, that's fine, just recognize that there can be no other (at least not to the one who adhres to that rule).

At least we can all agree that we love playing…

Great Stuff!
mike S

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 11:59 AM:

 

: )


yes, it's very fun playing.  

Here's a bit on religion, to me: it's a centuries-long game of telephone.  

Someone hits enlightenment, becomes realized, whatever we wish to call it.  

That person tells others, becomes a teacher.  

the students tell others, become teachers.  

eventually, a few generations later (in christianity's case, 200-300 years later) some of the students' students' students decide to write down the accounts they had of the origonal teacher.  

these accounts are copied and recopied, interpreted and reinterpreted.  at one point, a dictator changes the text, ideas and interpretations to make it easier for him to rule with his iron fist.  
Eventually, they are translated into other languages.  in the other languages, the current interpretation determines which definitions of words to use in the new language.  

For example, jesus's words became “the meek shall inherit the earth.”

“the egoless shall inherit the earth” to me is a much better choice of word.  But for centuries, english speaking christians haven't been able to make the connection to buddhism that is inherant in this idea.  


now lets look at all the major religons at once.  lets imagine that they all went through this process, which they did.  Therefore, in their messages, we have a lot of phsycic static– the collective interpretations and misunderstandings of centuries of seekers.  

You also have, beneath the static, the core message.  

If you look at all religons at once, assuming they are all staticy pictures, it is possible to clear the static away, but only with cross-referencing… finding the core ideas that are in all religons, we can clean up the picture of each religion.  

The egoless shall inherit the earth.  The law of attraction says: as you sow, so shall ye reap, but as sowing happens in the consciousness (which is all we are), right thought and right action are necessary.   Through egoless right thought and right action, we can attune ourselves to the dao, which suggests that we go with nature in all things.  Jesus agreed with this, and mocked members of the churches of babel for worshipping indoors– far better, he said, to walk in the woods.  

This is an example.  : )

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 19, 2008, 5:34 PM:

 

G'day Alan,

I think you're drawing a long bow with some of your assumptions.

I'm not an authority on any of the sacred scriptures of the world but you seem to be riding rough shod through territory in a few moments that would have seasoned Masters contemplating for hours or days.

Your assumptions leave a lot more questions than they answer.

I'm sure God is amused but some of His adherents might not be.

I think you should give some thought in your expression to allow those that might be perplexed at your mode of thinking, the opportunity to understand what the point is your trying to make.

In love, of course.

An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 6:12 PM:

 

: )


Are you sure I haven't contemplated for hours or days?  oh, my!  Where did you get that opinion?  Did you assume so because we disagree?  That'd be unfortunate.

Also, if you read my posts, you'll see the whole point is not telling you what I believe.  What I believe is as relevant to you as you think it is– in this case, obviously not much.  What I was describing was a method by which, with (exactly as you suggest) contemplation and careful meditation, the teachings of the masters can be seen through the centuries that obscured them.  

How long did you contemplate my words before you decided I was 
“riding roughshod?”  

here's another quick example of the links I drew above: Jesus said: “if you think lustful thoughts about  your neighbors thoughts, you have already committed adultery in your heart.”

It's a kind of harsh sentence, is it not?  Personally, I never liked how judgmental that sounds… but after, um, contemplating it for a while, I separated the idea of committing adultery from the judgment that our societies have heaped on the act.  And if you assume immediate forgiveness (which Jesus was about anyway) what Jesus is talking about in the context of the quotation is simply “right thought.”    'Keep your thoughts right, because it matters too.'  And it really does.  Cognitive Behavioral Psychology proves it, really.  

In love (with everything),

Alan

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 19, 2008, 6:32 PM:

 

haha, whups! there's a typo above.  The quote from jesus is about your neighbor's wife, not your neighbor's thoughts…. 


sorry!

  Jackie : Protector of the Innocent

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Jackie said Nov 19, 2008, 7:22 PM:

 

we gotcha.
=)

  Jackie : Protector of the Innocent

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Jackie said Nov 19, 2008, 7:16 PM:

 

I agree with you about right thoughts, Alan, and I asked the same question of my Pastor.  Being married I needed to know if I was on my way to hell because I couldn't control the fact that naughty ideas pop in - they just happen!

They way in which that was explained to me was even more based on a historical context.  Men in those days could divorce their wives for any reason whatsoever.  If they lusted for another woman, if she browned the bread too much, it didn't matter.  So many woman were on the streets, homeless.  They couldn't go back to their families because they would be a burden and no one wanted a divorced woman, so Jesus made that extreme statement to help create balance, so the streets weren't overflowing with homeless women and their children.

The same with scripture about woman not having roles of authority within the church.  Those rules were created because women were actually getting a little roudy and causing quite a bit of trouble, so extreme statements were made to create balance.

This, of course is just theory.  I have a Baptist Minister for a grandpa, so we get into it a lot.

Peacefully,
Jackie

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 20, 2008, 7:09 AM:

 

Hi Jackie,

Thanks, it's lovely to have you sharing your thoughts here. There are quite a few thorny verses to work through, good to have a Baptist minister grandfather to help!

Hugs,

Nicole

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 19, 2008, 8:27 PM:

 

My my how sensitive you are Alan,

I thought you were a serious player playing a serious game.

You have ridden roughshod over the sensitivities of many whose beliefs you planely distain.

I can't help wondering why you feel you have to prove your bona fides by resorting to big words and oblique references to how much time you have given to comparative study. 

Jesus said the letter kills, the Spirit gives life, or have you found a way to manipulate that to your way of thinking?

Jesus also said Resist not evil.  From your oppositional post you clearly see me as Satan to your form of religion, which is a pity. 

However I'll get over it.

I love you my friend but I'd ask you to demonstrate more respect towards the beliefs of others that share this website

An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 20, 2008, 7:27 AM:

 

It would seem that fear of no direction is a kind of direction - also an understandable fear, Mike. Directionality seems deeply a part of us.

Alan, I haven't heard these concepts referred to before as red and green lions. Cool!

Love,

Nicole

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Mr. said Nov 19, 2008, 5:10 PM:

 

Although I believe that what you say or write should be respectful to others beliefs it is good to try and push the envelope to get people to reach beyond their comfort zone. It is reaching beyond our comfort zones that makes us grow. It is important to be careful however (as a pdersonal safety issue) to do things in a respectful manner so as not to piss off someone or some group who takes religion a bit too seriously and marks you for retribution.

Its not always what is said but how it is said. There is a fine line and an art to writing things that are profoundly thought provoking without insulting someone. That is why this blog makes for good practice because, if you write something that offends someone's beliefs, they will let you know it. I am thankful that Nicole had the foresight to create it and still spends unknown hours daily commenting.

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 20, 2008, 7:20 AM:

 

Mr and Andrew, thank you. I am very grateful for the way that members like you follow the discussion here so closely and with such concern and attention for the thoughts and feelings of others.

Mr, I like the idea of pushing beyond our comfort zone to grow. I believe this is what Alan, Mike and Bjorn have been trying to do, each in his own way. I didn't read Alan's words as disrespectful, but maybe that is partly through familiarity with him. The more we get to know each other, the easier it is to hear the true intent behind the words we read.

Love,

Nicole

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 20, 2008, 7:33 AM:

 

I understand NIcole you may be familiar with Alan but unfortunately the Bible is an easy target, and I know people get really upset when others mess with it.  Particularly when it is manipulated almost beyond recognition by someone that appears to have little regard for it.

If Allan wants to start messing with scripture perhaps he could consider doing the same with the Koran and see how far he gets before a price is put on his head.

I'm not looking for trouble.  I just ask that Alan demonstrate the same respect towards others that he appears to demand for himself.

An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  mike S : Hahaaaa!

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 20, 2008, 10:55 AM:

 

Andrew,

So, in fact, are we setting a rule of not disturbing those who are serious about the bible? But should we respect those who are NOT serious about scripture? Should it not be manipulated? And how much seriousness or regard should we afford the bible or any other religious text? Should religious texts be attended to with respect or just those who take the texts serious? What type of respect should be given? should we not speak God's name in vain, since the rule of eternal damnation has been determined by many religions. We have to wonder, is that God's rule or religions?
I don't feel the question is whether or not we should have rules, since we have rules about everything? The question is how seriously do we adhere to the rules. Of course if we're not serious enough, then it all becomes a game. Does Spirit have anything to do with our rules or have we just imposed our rules upon Spirit thereby cutting ourselves off from it?

Inquiring minds want to know….

Peace Angels,
mike S

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 20, 2008, 1:58 PM:

 

This was such a nice thread, with such interesting ideas.  It's a shame for such things to get diverted because one person accidentally insults others.  


so, for accidentally insulting andrew and anyone else, I apologize.  

Please note that I may occasionally be unintentionally insulting in the future.  As it was unintentional, I cannot promise it won't happen again. 

Please know I also stand by everything I wrote, including the post about not completely understanding what I said that was so offensive.  

Can we get back to the fun part?

: -)

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 20, 2008, 3:56 PM:

 

Hi Mike and Alan,

I don't recollect, nor do I have the authority, to set 'rules' as you well know. 

The one thing that sets Gaia.com apart is the respect and tolerance that individuals demonstrate towards each other.

I don't judge one faiths scriptures to be any more or less Spirit inspired that any other, but to change a scripture to suite a particular viewpoint is going beyond the boundary of respect and good taste.

Arguing doctrine is an entirely different matter.  Doctrine being the interpretation of the scriptures of any particular faith, from which religion and dogma enter the equation to control the adherents of that particular faith.

If I am wrong gentlemen I will publicly and unequivocally apologise.

An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  mike S : Hahaaaa!

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 20, 2008, 4:34 PM:

 

Andrew,

my questions were not in relation to finite or fixed rules within Gaia, but more in relation to rules of any spirtual game.

I don't judge one faiths scriptures to be any more or less Spirit inspired that any other, but to change a scripture to suite a particular viewpoint is going beyond the boundary of respect and good taste.

But, of course, in your life you adhere more to some spiritual paths as opposed to others, thus you do judge, we all do. You seem to be saying that you have determined a rule that such judgments should not be expressed in Gaia, since this is Gaia's rule (I think).
However, in relation to Nicole's initial question about how to deepen the dialogue, my question is that, if we withhold our judgments and reserve our comments in the service of respect and tolerance, do we thus oppress the dialogue as opposed to deepening it?
if I was a satan worshipper would I be afforded the same respect and tolerance as the student of scripture? if not, why not?
My point is not to identify your statement as right or wrong, simply to identify the rules that we take serious in the spiritual games we play and do they limit us or liberate?

Thanks : )
mike S

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 20, 2008, 5:30 PM:

 

G'day Mike

If you wanted to draw from Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal, or it's English translation The Book of Abramelin then that's up to you.  I beleive Satanism is a recognised system of religion though I have had little to do with it. 

I know we have Wiccan adherents on Gaia as well.

The Spiritual path I follow is not in contradiction to any scripture of any faith I have read.  Certainly I'm considered a heretic according to Christian doctrine, an infidel according to Islamic doctrine a gentile according to Judaic doctrine etc etc. but these doctrines have been created from the interpretation of the scriptures, generally designed to control there adherents.

The scriptures I'm most familiar with are the Judeo-Christian scriptures and that is why I quote them the most often but I've read scripture from nearly every major religion in the cosmos. I could make exactly the same points using the Hindu scriptures or Confucianist scriptures, it would just take a lot longer to find the relevent references (a lot longer).

I don't know which scripture path your referring to that I most adhere to.

But it was the interfering with and altering those scriptures that I know people find insulting and disrespectful.

And I'm speaking as an Ambassador of Gaia, my personal opinion is irrelevant.

An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 20, 2008, 6:04 PM:

 

if you're considered a heritic… well, why are different viewpoints so offensive?


I mean, you didn't even really get what I was saying…

First: I am saying that Meek and Egoless are for intents and purposes synonyms, in that they share some meanings enough to be, in specific circumstances, interchangable.

Second, here it is again: the EGOLESS/MEEK shall inherit the earth.  The difference between the two versions of translation is not a matter of changing the scriptures, it's a matter of translating the scriptures different ways from one language to another. 

I think the first language is ancient aramaic.  (I can't remember if that's actually it, but I think so.)  

as in any translation, translating from ancient aramaic to english is not exact, because works don't mean the same things or have the same associations.  In fact, translation is an art in and of itself, not a science.  some grad-schools teach 'theories of translation' classes.  this wouldn't be possible if there wasn't some ability and necessity to choose between words  when going from one language to another.  As we all know, sentences have nuances.  Nuances usually do not get translated.  

So again, what I believe is that “egoless” is probably a better translation of the scripture into english, at least right now when the word meek has been misunderstood for centuries.

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 20, 2008, 6:52 PM:

 

G'day Alan,

I'm going to quote George M. Lamsa, an Assyrian born scholar who grew up in an area that still used the same Aramaic language (Syriac) that would have been used in Jesus's time.  His bio is here.

Ref. to “Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.” (Mat 5:5)

This beatitude is an Oriental proverb still commonly used.  It refers to the type of man who does not retaliate and who is free from that grasping temper which leads to disputes and quarrels often ending up in bloodshed and murder,  Such men believe in nonresistence and submit to injustice even at great inconvenience.  They seldom protest to the rulers of the earth but in their supplications they always remind God of their heavy burdens.  They are at last rewarded for their oppressors and persecutors generally perish in wars and revolutions.

It is still customary in the East, when a man dies or is killed in war, leaving no male heir, his land is turned over to the meritorious meek.  Landlords furthermore invariably prefer to lease their vineyards and farms to men of character who are responsible and reliable.  The meek are thus ultimately blessed and rise in power and prosperity.

-Gospel Light, Page 26, by George M. Lamsa

I don't know what meek means to you Alan but that sounds like a clear definition of the word to me.

An eccentric Australian (or village idiot)

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 20, 2008, 7:25 PM:

 

Thank you, we can now agree on a working definition of meek.  


my meek=egoless statement still applies as everything therein can also be ascribed to egolessness.  

is this the part of the 'dispute' where we pretend to be disagreeing even if we aren't disagreeing anymore?  : )  I like that part.  But I like ending the disagreement entirely better.  Seeing as we are now debating the definition (and perhaps the validity) of the word meek, it does seem that it is a fair and debatable question to ask.  Not an attack on the bible.  Quoting a favorite expert on the theory proves it… it's at least enough of an issue for an expert to write on.  

I think that brings us out of the woods, yes?   

Anyway, I was saying… it is possible to make all the major religions fundamentally agree, instead of fundamentally disagree.  It begins with the mindset that says: the universe is alive, and god is the alive universe.  OR with the mindset that says: all humans have the same soul/spiritual apparatus, so it is likely they were all using different languages, phrasings and ideas to point their metaphorical fingers at the same moon.  

 

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Andrew [no longer around] said Nov 20, 2008, 7:50 PM:

 

I have no disagreement with you on that score Alan,

You have been here a lot longer that I, so I'm sure it hasn't escaped your notice that there are traditional enemy's sharing space here at Gaia.  It can only work if there is mutual respect, that respect being for the foundation for ones belief system.  In most cases that will be related to writings that have been passed down, generation after generaton, meticulously copied by scholars singled out for that work.

To offer dignity and respect and withdraw judgement for someone elses faith mixed with love and a gentle approach in matters pertaining to discussing those differences makes Gaia.com unique.

I've made my point, can we move on now?

An eccentric Aussie (or village idiot)

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 20, 2008, 8:48 PM:

 

it has escaped my notice.  enemies?   I don't really vibrate that way…. I believe everything is one.  Therefore, no one has enemies, we only have misunderstandings with  each other.



everything else I understand and completely share your sentiments.  

but I would add that we would do well respect all of each other's opinions, even the ones that initially seem in conflict with our own.  This means not accusing them of things…  To become offended is a choice we all make or don't make.  To recognize that all opinions are valid would be to hear even the most 'horrid' idea and not take it personally, to react with it in some way outside of anger.  perhaps this energy is needed in these dialogs most.  Otherwise, we create a tension-filled situation where it didn't need to be.


  Albert  : Evolutionary Entrepreneur

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Albert said Nov 19, 2008, 8:00 PM:

 

Who knows what the Sanskrit Word “Kridaratnam” means?

Want to add an article from Gwen Gordon:

PLay: The Movement of Love

And subsequent one co-written by Gwen Gordon and Sean Esbjörn Hargens:

An Exploration Of The Playground And The Evolution Of The PLayer

Enjoy,

Albert

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 20, 2008, 7:11 AM:

 

Albert, I really appreciate your second link and I think I would enjoy the first - except it doesn't work. Would you fix it, please, so we can see what it says?

Love,

Nicole

  Albert  : Evolutionary Entrepreneur

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Albert said Nov 20, 2008, 7:19 AM:

 

Nicole,

try this:

PLay: The Movement of Love


It should work and was originally posted for the Play Pod.


Albert

  Nicole : wakingdreamer

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Nicole said Nov 20, 2008, 7:23 AM:

 

Ah, it's in the same thread as the other post, higher up! I see it now, and it is even more delightful than I hoped. Thank you. For example, this part:

When we play, we enter the creative current of possibilities, the self-organizing force of the whole cosmos, as active participants. Before the human, all animals were specialized for particular niches. We have the flexibility of the cosmos dancing right in our neurons, enabling us to move into any niche and explore the whole world as a playground.

  mike S : Hahaaaa!

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

mike S said Nov 20, 2008, 10:40 AM:

 

As i read the essay Albert linked to I thought, 'okay another merging of the child-like paradigm of play into the adult play paradigm.' but then I came to this:

The philosopher James Carse, in a brilliant little book called Finite and Infinite Games, describes the difference between finite and infinite play. Finite play has rigid limits, rules, winners and losers, and does not include everybody in the game. Infinite play, on the other hand, changes the rules as needed and includes everyone. The whole purpose of infinite play is to keep the play going. Now we can see a little more clearly what has gone awry in our world. Without caring connection, infinite play becomes finite. With high stakes, winners and losers, it takes itself very seriously and when you take things too seriously you end up dropping bombs. The ultimate expression of finite play is war.

But in infinite play, everything-war, death, deadlines, annoying bosses, barbed wire fences, fear and terrorism-can all be brought into the play. This implies that it's possible to get to the source of being that lets you sing and dance no matter what else is going on. When our sense of well-being comes from a deep enough intimacy with the Universe, there's nothing to win or lose. We can risk anything. We can trust that no matter how foolish, confused, or inept we might be, we will not fall out of the web of life. Being held keeps us from holding back from the world and lets us participate play-fully.


I feel the author has adequately, but not comprehensively, provided an excellent encapsulation of Carse's chief ideas. Foremost being that play is one paradigm (not two) and not extracted from childhood and amenable to only certain areas or specific domains of adulthood, but applicable across the board in all domains of adult living.
In fact, death is itself a game and for most a very serious game with strict rules. But what if we changed the rules. Would we then take it less seriously? Would we then be open to “suprise” (one of Carse's chief concepts, similar in many ways to 'enlightenment')

On my blog I have extrapolated some of my own ideas from Carse's book with direct quotes from the author here

Peace Angels,
mike S

  Albert  : Evolutionary Entrepreneur

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Albert said Nov 21, 2008, 11:13 AM:

 

Mike,

I am especially referring to the lengthy article from AQAL JOurnal.

What astonishes me most that either child like play is associated or “serious” spiritual striving.

In the real world with so much vmemetic complexity and monstrous dimensions (Sloterdijk 2007 at Royal Albert Academy in Belgium)
have to be taken into account it should be celar that advanced adult play in utter complexity is a challenge!

I am in contact with an Austrian German Game designer who is developing something in this direction. She adresses the emerging dynamics between female and masculine energies too  -besides other diversity generators .in a wide historic context.

Howard Bloom is one those brilliant veterans who always was into it.

The ultimate Master Game dimensions include necessarily the dimension of birth, transcendence, transformation and death.

But it has to be lived, breathed and felt, as KW says in the quote of my profile page.

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 22, 2008, 12:01 AM:

 

I love this all!


I especially love the heightening of the discussion on play, with that wonderful description of universal play.  Oh that feels right!  

And to feel it, you have to play it.  If you play it long enough, you'll feel it.  It's acutely inevitable.  

One thing that strikes me is the intense similarity between the description of 'universal play' and actual child's play.  

In both, all experiences are all and all both a vehicle and summed-up-to growth.  In both, growth is the out-and-out goal: every child knows they are becoming older, becoming an adult, growing: becoming is the natural state of a child, and so they don't focus on it.  They just know it's happening.  

In both, there's a fundamental aliveness, a connection, a trust.  

In both, I'd say there's intense submission the child to the will of the parents, the 'universal' to the universe itself.  

And in both, there's both a preconscious and conscious understanding that growth is the name of the game.  Growth is everything.  

As 'adults,' when a child soberly tells us that “when I was six, I used to be afraid of the dark, but now I'm not afraid of the dark anymore.”  

usually we smile at the cuteness…

How much better it'd be if we could say: “oh yeah?  I know how you feel… when I was 34, I used to be afraid of becoming poor, but now I'm not afraid anymore.  You did a great job growing!”  

heheheh, some say the children will lead us.  

  Alan :  Life to life.

Re: God is a Serious Game for Serious Players Only!

Alan said Nov 20, 2008, 9:48 AM:

 

Jackie, 


Thank you for your lovely comments!  Right thought indeed is important.   And you also raise another point, which is that most of our historical teachers themselves were occasionally responding to temporary, contemporary conditions that in almost all cases don't exist anymore.  Still, there are many contemporary condition responses that are pretty universal… I feel that way about Jesus's spiel on the Priests of Babel, for example.  : )

Nicole:

You're awesome.  

Andrew:

I'm sorry, but I don't really know what you're talking about.  I mean: I hear what you're saying but it doesn't really compute.  Sometimes, I say things, and then people think I said entirely different things.  And then people tell me that I said this and that and I'm wrong for this and that reason and I go: “Huh?”

For example, I have no idea who you think I've disrespected by stating my perspective as plainly and honestly as I can, but as far as I'm concerned, their assumed offense has more to do with them than me.  I believe what I said was logical, based on more or less accepted facts, and inclusive and loving of all walks of faith.  I said what I said in this spirit.   

It really has been many centuries since the old masters did their thing, and the messages have been interpreted and reinterpreted.  I didn't say a word about the bible that was negative.  The bible is fine with me.  Like everything, it literally IS the consciousness that we often call god.  Why would I be angry at it?  Doesn't compute, mate.  : )

I respect all who walk, swim, and exist.  I love all who do so.  I love you too.  

hello!

A