| |
Thanks, its good that you are back :)
Another thing that can be added is that usually leaders are born out of circumstances. Real leaders and lead (not just playing the role) are naturally placed in their positions when something needs to be done, provided that in the group all care for each other. The leader doesn't see himself any different from the others, and vice versa.
I think when the leader and lead Choose their positions (and i think current democratic processes today fall in this category) its because they both are looking for personal gain, and not a common benefit or a solution to a problem. Usually the leader seeks power and the lead comfort. Still, circumstances again play a strong role…
Imo when one condition is intended to change into a different one, and more so when the original has prevailed for a long time, there are 2 ways to do it: the first is to destroy the first one and then clean up the mess until the goal is achieved. The second one is to patiently make small and then larger changes, putting pressure without breaking.
Both arrive at the same place, require the same amount of energy, and have the same amount of hardships, sorrow, hope and happiness throughout the process. Which option is taken i guess depends on the general average Character of the group, and Luck. Take care! (you have a shark suit?! cool)
|