Hi TMI friends!!!

I call myself rubytone.  I am fairly new to the zaadz community and brand new here.

Thank you Jeff for the invitation!!!

I have just completed the Sync Creation home workshop.  It is geared towards manifestation and follows C1, Focus 10 and Focus 12,  I have Listened to a TMI cd from a friend that concentrated on Focus 15 for intuitive development. 

I have found the workshop to be all that it promised and new understanding and ability to manifest more quickly is occurring each day.  It has been well worth the money and time investment.

Being that I Am involved full time in Living in the Moment and work daily within planetary energies and inner work, it is hard for me to pinpoint the exact tool that has led to quicker manifestations, however, I choose to believe that it has been an accumulation of all tools that has led to this pleasurable experience !!!

I would be curious to learn from you others what particular abilities have been increased with your experience with the other TMI programs.

Many Blessings of Abundance and Prosperity !!!

rubytone

Re: Hi TMI friends!!!

Welcome, rubytone!

Is Sync Creation produced by Joe Gallenberger?

The variety of experiences and directions in life that result from TMI and related programs always fascinates me.  My experience has been more in the direction of letting go, acceptance, community.  I also have discovered some healing ability.

Karl

Re: Hi TMI friends!!!

Hi.

Yes, SyncCreation is Joe Gallenberger's creation.

Regards,
    Ricardo

Re: Hi TMI friends!!!

Hi everyone.

I have also bought the SyncCreation home course about 1 and a half year ago. Experiencing it's quality I decided to bring Dr. Joe to teach a SyncCreation workshop in Europe (Portugal), which I did, last December. He will be coming to Portugal this May again to teach another SyncCreation workshop.

I am also a fan of both Dr Joe's and the Monroe Institute work. I love the SyncCreation Hemi-Sync exercises. I have also done a couple of Metamusic and Gateway exercises (Wave I and II).

I trully believe that Hemi-Sync has a great potential.

Best regards,
    Ricardo Pereira

Re: Hi TMI friends!!!

I completed the Gateway Experience series about a year ago and have been benefiting from it on a daily basis. I'm now able to achieve deep states of meditation (focus 10 & 12) without the cds. I'm having more OBEs now than ever before.

I've thought about purchasing the SyncCreation home course but have not been able to read enough testimonials before committing to a purchase - so it was great to come accross your posts today.

Please share more of your SyncCreation experiences.

Blessings and Peace,

Dave

Re: Hi TMI friends!!!

Hi Dave.

For me, the SyncCreation course has been a true gift.

It has taught me how to open to abundance and dissolve our own limitations/fears.

Because of its exercises (Hemi-Sync meditations and others) I feel like my heart energy center has opened a lot, and that I can feel much more grounded and feeling fresh energy with each breath.

I've had some true manifestation experiences using the SyncCreation techniques learned.

Per instance, about 2 weeks ago I expressed my intention (using the SyncCreation's techniques) of getting, somehow, a good amount of money. About a week later, I received, from my family (parents) a good amount of money, without expecting it and without haveing asked for it (and it had been quite a while since I had received such an amount of money from them). That same week I also got the news that my new contract at work was possibly going to raise my salary substantially.

I used these same techniques, about 1 year ago, to express my intention of getting involved with the Monroe Institute work (when I decided that was something I deeply wanted to do), somehow, by helping organize residential courses or becoming a trainer, and 2 days later I received an email from Dr. Joe Gallenberger (whom I had been in touch, some months before, when I had shown interest in attending his Vegas Adventure workshop some day) asking if I was still interested in attending a Vegas workshop and he also mentioned that he had been in Europe. I replied to his email and told what my intention was and he promptly offered himself to come to Portugal to teach a SyncCreation residential course, and in a couple of emails we had it all arranged :)

These were just 2 big examples of how I saw the fast and efficient results of these techniques. I have witnessed plenty of other smaller ones, some of them with imediate results.

Do you know those coincidences that we see, around us, that may crucially help us going one way or the other? This course is about learning how to make those coincidences happen, with our own intention.


This and having a spoon become as soft in your hands like as if it was made of plasticine, empowers you a lot! :)

Hope my testimony helped.

Best regards,
   Ricardo Pereira

synccreationinportugal.com
Start influencing your reality in a whole new different way…!

Re: Hi TMI friends!!!

Hey Ricardo,

Thanks for sharing about your SyncCreation experiences. I can really relate with what you say about making coincidences or synchronicity happen with our intention. I've noticed that once I place my intention and focus on something and charge it with positive energy and confidence, I'm able to manifest it in my life within a day or so. I agree that there truly are no real coincidences. We are suppose to be where we are at each moment as a result of our choices and for the lessons that we and others may need to learn. I've been also learning that it is not our rational logical mind that does the manifesting - it's out heart energy that is compassionately resonating and connected to universal life force that makes the difference.

Having a spoon soften in your hand must really empower you? Could you share more about the different hemi-sync states such as focus 10, 12, 15, etc that are used for psychokinesis?

Peace and Blessings,

Dave  

SyncCreation and PK

Ricardo's post has left me darn curious for the last month, as it may have for other posters here in the pod. Robert Monroe talked about OBE and remote veiwing in his books but how about PK or psychokinesis?

I've gone through the Gateway Experience cd home series and remembered the exercise in remote viewing where the listener is guided to “connect” consciously with the consciousness of a friend or loved one and then try to “see” what six numbers he or she wrote on a card in an envelope… and next see where he or she hid some cotton balls. Robert Monroe leads the voyager to heat up the cotton balls in the quest to “locate” the balls position. As far as I can tell, this is TMIs first introduction to PK?

I would like to purchase SyncCreation but I can't justify the $700 at this time in our family budget. I just purchased a $15 PK hypnosis cd and will see how that goes. 

I've found that Pk is a bit intimidating, as it requires a rewiring of the subconsious that has been conditioned by a highly skeptical western society in regards to the psychic manipulation of physical matter, let alone, precognition, clairvoyance, and OBE. I'm going to step way out of the box and give this one a go.

Any others here in the pod who would like to give this a try as well? MTF

Best wishes,

Dave

Re: Hi TMI friends!!!

Dave, I don't know of anyplace where Bob talks about PK in any of his books, or any earlier intro to PK than the Gateway Experience tapes.  From what I understand, doing PK with substantial material objects often requires lots of group energy, a PK party.  There are other ways to play around with PK, via micro-PK, PK done on things like random-number generators.  See, for example, the IONS Psi Arcade, GotPsi, and the RetroPsychoKinesis Experiments.

Karl

Re: Hi TMI friends!!!

Karl,

Thanks for the helpful tips and links. It makes sense to attempt starting off “micro” with PK dosesn't it?  Here are a few more article and websites links that may be helpful: Spoon Bending Party, Telekinesis Test and Jack Houck Founder of PK Parties.

Jack Houck has written many articles on remote viewing and PK. In one of his articles he details some research work that has been done with EEG feedback. He found that when we listen to frequency ranges between 7.81 to 7.83 Hz, we open up a “mental access window” that induces out of body experiences. Further on in the article he mentions Hemi-Sync as another  “technique for inducing selective brain wave frequencies.”

Robert Monroe says in his Gateway Affirmation, “We are more than our physical body.” Human consciousness can expand or extent beyond the physical confines of the organic brain and body while in a “mental access window” brought on by relaxing the body through meditation, REM dream cycles, hypnosis, binaral beat hemispheric brain synchronization, and various other trance state techniques ultilized by shamans and mystics of indigenous and wisdom traditions.

MTF

Dave

Mind Over Machine

Hi Karl,

I found an excerpt from Lynn McTaggart's Living the Field course that talks about mind over machines and random event generators that may be helpful to this discussion. http://www.livingthefield.com/

“Mind Over Machine

The simplest way to test the power of human intention is to see if human consciousness can affectmachinery that is governed by a probabilistic system.

In the 1970s, Helmut Schmidt, a physicist and researcher at Boeing Aeronautics, produced the first ‘random number generator', a 20th-century version of the flip of a coin, the movements of which were based on a system of random radioactive atomic decay. These are machines with an output consisting of perfectly random activity that, in physics, is viewed as a state of ‘disorder'.

If it can be shown that participants in a study have altered some element of the machine's output-even ever so slightly-they would have shifted the odds of something happening or altered the tendency of a system to behave in a certain way. Some information transfer or ordering mechanism would be going on-what physicists term ‘negative entropy', or  negentropy' for short-the move away from randomness or disarray.

It's like persuading a person at a crossroads, momentarily undecided about taking a walk, to head down one road rather than another. They would, in other words, have created order. The most persuasive of these studies has been designed and carried out by former dean of engineering Robert Jahn, at the Princeton Anomalies Engineering Research (PEAR) laboratory at Princeton University. Jahn refined and improved Schmidt's original equipment, determining that his random event generators, or REGS (pronounced with a hard ‘G'), should be driven by an electronic noise source rather than atomic decay. The random movement of these machines (to either heads or tails) is controlled by a randomly alternating frequency of positive and negative pulses. Their output is utterly random and without any inherent order so, according to the laws of probability, they can be expected to produce either heads or tails approximately 50 per cent of the time.

The most common configuration is a computer screen that is randomly alternating two images-say, cowboys and Indians. Over hundreds of thousands of studies, Jahn has decisively demonstrated that human intention can influence these random electronic devices to produce more of one image, as specified by the participant (more Indians than cowboys, say).1

In 1987, a combined analysis of all the REG experiments-more than 800- carried out by some 68 investigators showed that experimenters could affect the machine so that it gave the desired result 51 per cent of the time instead of the expected 50 per cent. In some of Schmidt's experiments, certain individuals had shifted the odds to 54 per cent.2

Although 51 or 54 per cent doesn't sound like much of an effect, statistically speaking, it's a giant step. If you combine all the studies into what is called a ‘metaanalysis', the odds of this overall score occurring are a trillion to one.3 The US National Research Council also concluded that the REG trials could not be explained by chance.4

An ‘effect size' is a figure which resembles the actual size of change or outcome in a study. It is arrived at by factoring in such variables as the number of participants and the duration time of the test. The overall effect size of the PEAR database was 0.2 per hour.5 The PEAR effect sizes are considered small, whereas the overall REG studies are considered small-to-medium. However, these effect sizes are far larger than those of many drugs deemed to be highly successful in medicine. For instance, the effect of aspirin in preventing heart disease is 0.032-about 10 times smaller than the PEAR effect size.

A simple way to understand effect sizes is to convert it into the number of persons surviving out of 100 people in a medical emergency. An effect size of 0.2 means that 20 more people than expected out of 100 will survive.

To give some hypothetical idea of the magnitude of the PEAR effect size, let's say that, with a certain type of heart operation, one-third of patients usually survive. Now, say that patients undergoing this operation are given a new drug with an effect size of 0.3-about the size of the PEAR effect. Offering the drug on top of the operation would virtually double the survival rate, so that two-thirds of patients undergoing the procedure will live. An additional effect size of 0.3 would turn a medical treatment that had been lifesaving less than half the time into one that worked in a majority of cases.
Lynne McTaggart

1 Behav Brain Sci, 1987; 10: 600-1
2 Broughton RS. Parapsychology: The  Controversial Science. NY: Ballantine Books, 1991:177
3 Radin D. The Conscious Universe: The Scientific Truth of Psychic Phenomena. NY: HarperEdge, 1997: 140
4 Found Phys, 1989; 19 (12): 1499-514
5 PEAR Technical Note 94003, 1994; September

The mothers of intention

Humans are not the only living beings with influence over the physical world. Using a variation of Jahn's REG machines, a French scientist named René Peo'ch carried out an ingenious experiment with baby chicks. As soon as they were born, a movable REG was ‘imprinted' on them as their ‘mother'. The robot was then placed outside the chicks' cage and allowed to move about freely while Peo'ch tracked its path. After a time, the evidence was clear - the robot was moving toward the chicks more than it would do if it were wandering randomly.

The desire of the chicks to be near their mother was an ‘inferred intention' that appeared to be having an effect in drawing the machine nearer.

Peo'ch carried out a similar study with baby rabbits. He placed a bright light on the movable REG that the baby rabbits found abhorrent. When the data from the experiment were analyzed, it appeared that the rabbits were successfully willing the machine to stay away from them.”

Re: Mind Over Machine

Wow!  Thanks for posting that, Dave.  I hadn't heard of the Peo'ch experiments.

On a related note, have you looked at the Global Consciousness Project?  It operates a network of random number generators and tries to correlate episodes of coherence with events that have some kind of global-scale impact, like 9-11 or Princess Diana's death.  The recent Fire the Grid event is another example; the GCP did find a correlation.

Karl

Re: Mind Over Machine

Hi Karl,

I just checked out the GCP website. I'm familiar with it through authors Lynn McTaggart, (The Field and The Intention Experiment), and Dean Radin, (Entangled Minds), but was glad to visit it first hand. It was very interesting to see the graphs of global-scale impacts. How exciting about the Fire the Grid correlation. I participated in the event at 4:11 am Pacific Time and was just able to stay awake for an hour to meditate and send peaceful and healing intention to the grid.

Are you familiar with Lynn's The Intention Experiment website?

Blessings,
Dave