| |
Quo Vadis
A perspective for extended thinking and action area of Dorothea room and Don E. Beck “I love this country! ”, Federal President Horst Köhler in its inaugural speech said 2004. Nobody laughed or pulled those to brow high.
Beyond petroleum (before times British Petrol) scolded full-page announcements with various “German”, among other things:
Johann Wolfgang von Goethe… sauerkraut… Ms miracles… office mould… Albert Einstein… Semper opera… Bertold break… to oak… Gretchen… brothers Grimm… Siegfried… pink Luxembourg… Johannes good mountain… Loreley… fall of the wall… Otto von Bismarck… Pellkartoffel… garden dwarf… Immanuel Kant… Ostfriesennerz… Albrecht Dürer… Brezeln… garbage separation…
Among them stands: “We are gladly here.”
After decades German skirt is at one time cool again rather.
Prominent politicians discuss over the necessity for a German guiding culture and German virtues. Deutschtümelnde neo-Nazis sit in the Saxonian federal state parliament.
Does one have to do with the other something? Does Germany induce itself to involution-back into one to nationalism, extremism, ever more strongly itself a polarizing society? Or is it on the way to look for something which was lost to it, something, which it necessarily, in order further to go to be able?
60 years after victory over the Nazi regime and 16 years after the case of the wall are the questions about how we work, how we live together, as we learn urgent, more deeply and more vitally ever. They affect the existenziellen and spirituellen bases of our identity as humans, as nation, as a society and as a responsible person fellow player in a deeply fragmented and at the same time from each other dependent and connected world.
For the moment it looks in such a way, as if Germany wants to insert the reverse gear. Backwards, because none of the parties orders over a convincing and load-carrying future draft for Germany, which would be appropriate for the complexity of the political, economic, social and social challenges. Which is to be accused to them not simply. We live 20 in times of large circulations, those with the ideological concepts, practical models and idealistic conceptions. Century no longer to be met can. And if the situation is intensified and first of all increases the general confusion, make themselves Demagogen, simple, extremists and fundamentalists likewise the socks. We see also it already well on the way.
In the Einstein year however little our situation brings 2005 in such a way on the point like the statement of the low-intimate physicist: “We cannot solve problems with same thinking, these problems create have.”
The question is: Do we have resources, which a qualitative leap into new thinking, a new existence level to make possible? If, which there is and as we mobilize it? Or which holds back us? And which new Denken-eines, which in complexes, connections in the fragmenting and the deeper dynamic forces, which form a thinking, an acting and the identity in individuals and whole cultures, is called recognizes order in the chaos, simplicity?
With a new perspective we discover the deeper samples of the human psyche, the value systems, which are the basis for the behavior and the development on the different levels of the Seins and Zusammenseins of humans. In spiral Dynamics integral, one of the most precise models of cultural development, were investigated these value systems and development codes, which constitute our “cultural DNA”. For the better communication the individual levels with colors were designated.
The key thought is: Humans, cultures and subcultures, whole nations dance on different levels of psychosocial evolution, set different priorities in their value systems, have different value Memes as emphasis. They are all verwoben with one another in an unfolding global fabric, an enormous alive body, which begins to become only conscious its even straight. And they emergieren one on the other following, not in rigid linear form, but is even like the life: hurrying ahead, back-yielding, looking for detours, playful, sometimes inconsiderately and brutally lessons demanding, mäandernd, dancing. But emerges internal dynamics and order following, in after each out-differentiated stage the new with constantly higher complexity and quantum transitions. In the midst of the largest quantum transition of our history we move obviously now of the realm the necessity-beige green into a realm of the real possibility off yellow. (To the further information over spiral Dynamics integral see also www.wie.org/spiral)
To the art, the mental, to understand spirituellen, to master social and cultural challenges of our century belongs substantially, to recognize the natural river of this evolution what it blocked and where a diseased development, a too much one or a too little, conflicts, crises and wars produce, which natural next stage lines up and which it needs to their optimal development.
What is called for Germany? For example:
For many decades the Germans were gladly Bavaria or Lower Saxony, Frankfurt ones or citizens of Berlin. In the east they were citizens of the GDR. To be German was not in. National feelings were considered as nationalistic Mief from yesterday. Its was called progressive to be at least European or Weltbürger.
But in this country, that perhaps thus begins, to free themselves of its debt feelings for the time of fascism and set responsibility for it in their place, seems to something at one time to be missing. One level between that is missing geographically/to cultural identity as Munich and a citizen of the world, which are rooted in the tradition of this country, their light and its shade, its language and its history of ideas.
And it is missing load-carrying future draft for this country, model Germany, which and is nevertheless firmly in the reality created a framework for with one another of his 80 million humans offer also those, who are from other culture areas to us come being, which demands and promotes both, simultaneous visionär enough, in order to inspire head and heart. A model Germany for the own identity and development, less for the remainder of the world…..”
|