|
|
One Experience, two perspectivesBjorn said Aug 23, 2007, 1:34 AM: |
||
|
What blows me away all the time is the realization that we all share the same Experience. When it dawned upon me it literally took away all confusion. |
|||
|
|
Re: One Experience, two perspectivesOmi said Feb 9, 2008, 7:37 PM: |
||
|
If we both look up, we say the same word…”sky.” But then I say it is blue and even. Then you say it is dark with stars in it. We say sky but that sky does not appear in the same way to any two people. Someone else says it is orange with clouds. Now three may be confused. But if we change places we say “Oh!” I see what you mean. Yet if we blink at different times while looking we do not see all of the same moments. And when I look away the sky disappears. And for you it does not. Descriptions always fall short. Views are based on describing what you see. But when an astronaut sees the earth she does not see a sky, or have a view that a sky exists. She sees endless space and all previous views are humbled to memory. Without memory no judgments, views or agreements would exist based on what is not directly seen. The mind cuts up the sky into slices with the eye. How could it be one mind? Its only because I see that you have the same eyes and the same mind that we don't need to make things up, or convince one another of what is “out there.” If we don't agree its only temporary. We will put the sky back together in time. Still, what is “seen” is “true” for one as seen for one. After a man dies, he says I don't even see “space”, nor do I see even see myself. All those moments no longer exist. In this way even oneness has partiality. We describe oneness as a view, an idea, not the thing itself. No one has been able to see all there is, so how could they describe it? If we acknowledge that “there is more” that is enough to agree. A view is a view, a description a description, and a sight a sight. What holds it together is not seen with the eyes. Slice after slice, view after view maybe one day we will say at last there is just “One Mind.” Then religions, stories, and opinions will all be laughed at by those who will walk out of the asylum. ;-) |
|||
|
|
Re: One Experience, two perspectivesBjorn said Feb 11, 2008, 12:39 AM: |
||
|
One Mind has to be implemented as we communicate. It has to be implicit. Wanting to realize this unified perspective gives direction in our engagement. It is an inner mutual experience, to be shared as we commune. To be realized in action together with others. |
|||

Help



