Explore
Gaia Soulmates
down  About This Group
One Mind
At once, step up onto the platform.

Above, communication can begin.
Below, vain discrimination never ends.

Argument is not for this Pod. Join in, at the level of Oneness. Share and commune freely. Explore spiritual freedom. Understand religious evolution. Understand discipleship. Understand the role of the Guru. Understand different levels of spiritual evolution. If you don't...(more)
down  About This Room
Explore our Oneness in action. Enact our highest understanding. Share ourself in a free flow of participation. One Body, One Mind, One Soul.
down  Room Activity
Bjorn : One Mind
Bjorn posted a reply to the conversation "One Experience" ()
Opening : Opening
Opening posted a reply to the conversation "One Experience" ()
Bjorn : One Mind
Bjorn posted a reply to the conversation "One Experience" ()
Opening : Opening
Opening posted a reply to the conversation "One Experience" ()
Bjorn : One Mind
Bjorn posted a reply to the conversation "One Experience" ()
Opening : Opening
Opening posted a reply to the conversation "One Experience" ()
down  Group Grapevine
 Advertising keeps Gaia free! Interested in sponsoring us?
Resultset_previousprevious thread | next threadResultset_next
threaded | unthreaded | newest first


  Bjorn : One Mind

One Experience, two perspectives

Bjorn said Aug 23, 2007, 1:34 AM:

 

What blows me away all the time is the realization that we all share the same Experience. When it dawned upon me it literally took away all confusion.

I literally mean that we share this One Experience at all times, at all situations. What became clear is that whether we hold a personal view or a larger impersonal perspective, we all roam around inside this common Experience. We share the exact common traits of this experience of life. So we can actually say that we experience the same thing as the other next to us. That's what we usually call emphathy but it stems from literally experiencing the same thing simultaniously.

The liberating thing though, was the ability to see the difference between what view we adopt at any given time. Depending on situation we all naturally adopt a personal or impersonal view to fit the occasion. This happens most naturally. When I speak to you, you easily respond in a personal manner. When we view the world or a larger context, we easily comprehend it in an impersonal way.

Most of all ignorance or con-fusion happens when we mix them up, or “fuse” them together (con-fuse) and can't tell them apart. Or when we harbour ideas of one being inferior or less true than the other. As when we side with the Absolute side of life and deem this manifest realm as lesser or apart from an Absolute perspective.

Sharing this One Experience all the time does not mean that we understand everything everybody else understands, but we recognize our joint experience and because of it find no separation or limits to our “communion”. Freedom lies in this mutual recognition, from where all communication can begin and exploration find no limits.

This One Experience reveals our common Mind, our joint Body and our true Nature or Spirit.

The relative, or personal, fits right in. It does not contend nor does it interfere with this One Experience of ours.

Any thoughts?

  Omi : Thunder in the sky

Re: One Experience, two perspectives

Omi said Feb 9, 2008, 7:37 PM:

 

If we both look up, we say the same word…”sky.” But then I say it is blue and even. Then you say it is dark with stars in it. We say sky but that sky does not appear in the same way to any two people. Someone else says it is orange with clouds. Now three may be confused. But if we change places we say “Oh!” I see what you mean.


Yet if we blink at different times while looking we do not see all of the same moments. And when I look away the sky disappears. And for you it does not. 

Descriptions always fall short. Views are based on describing what you see. But when an astronaut sees the earth she does not see a sky, or have a view that a sky exists. She sees endless space and all previous views are humbled to memory. Without memory no judgments, views or agreements would exist based on what is not directly seen. 

The mind cuts up the sky into slices with the eye. How could it be one mind? Its only because I see that you have the same eyes and the same mind that we don't need to make things up, or convince one another of what is “out there.” If we don't agree its only temporary. We will put the sky back together in time.

Still, what is “seen” is “true” for one as seen for one. After a man dies, he says I don't even see “space”, nor do I see even see myself. All those moments no longer exist.

In this way even oneness has partiality. We describe oneness as a view, an idea, not the thing itself. No one has been able to see all there is, so how could they describe it? If we acknowledge that “there is more” that is enough to agree. A view is a view, a description a description, and a sight a sight. What holds it together is not seen with the eyes.

Slice after slice, view after view maybe one day we will say at last there is just “One Mind.” Then religions, stories, and opinions will all be laughed at by those who will walk out of the asylum. ;-)




  Bjorn : One Mind

Re: One Experience, two perspectives

Bjorn said Feb 11, 2008, 12:39 AM:

 

One Mind has to be implemented as we communicate. It has to be implicit. Wanting to realize this unified perspective gives direction in our engagement. It is an inner mutual experience, to be shared as we commune. To be realized in action together with others.

We all can experience One Mind by our self, but to realize it together with others is something all-together different. That's the challenge, to strive for, to endavour, to bring about a new, more holistic, more complete, more inclusive awareness.

We can do this simply in writing like this to each-other. We need not to hold to differing views and opinions. We can simply be with what is true, before we make a distinction about our own prejudice.

I hear what you say and I do not dis-agree but I am trying to convey a joint experience that we share now, not in the distant future. This still may be true even if we do not yet understand it.

Bjorn