|
|
the mind shiftstella azul said Dec 29, 2006, 7:02 AM: |
||
|
As human beeings we are part of the problem, not the solution. We are the only beeings, that things, they could have privat thought and could therefore be cut off from the whole universe, which is in total communication. The nessisary mind shift have to come from beyond our own frame of reference of time and space. |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftsandy said Dec 30, 2006, 8:21 PM: |
||
|
love it Stella - |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftrashthawani said Jan 1, 2007, 3:14 AM: |
||
|
stella |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftAngela said Jan 1, 2007, 6:47 PM: |
||
|
Wow, that’s cool, Rash. So what does this mean?Most (90%?) of our actions are beyond our conscious control (body regulation, emotional responses, memories etc.). In other words, we are animals. If “man is the only one who can cease to divide himself from the world” this must be through our consciousness. So as we evolve to be more conscious, to be less controlled by our pimitive fears and emotional reactions, to be more aware of what is versus what we imagine …well then there's nothing to say, right? |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftMary said Sep 23, 2007, 12:52 PM: |
||
|
i agree and disagree |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftMichael said Oct 2, 2007, 7:05 AM: |
||
|
WELL SAID mary. |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftsandy said Oct 21, 2007, 5:11 AM: |
||
|
Such a beautiful page Michael- |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftEsse said Nov 3, 2007, 8:29 PM: |
||
|
I like when you said: “What is the solution? The reastablishment of communication by the Spirit of the Universe in us.” |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftsandy said Nov 3, 2007, 8:52 PM: |
||
|
I would have used magical instead of magicians- |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftMarcus said Nov 15, 2007, 10:03 AM: |
||
|
I personally don't see any problem with say “human existence in its current state”. “If the world is bad, refer to your dad, and his 'fore, four score” |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftAdam said May 31, 2008, 7:42 PM: |
||
|
I highly agree. Especially about the animals. It is not that humans are “more advanced” so to speak. Rather, our “design” is more apt to the conquering of the planet, then, for example, squirrels, which are “designed” more for gathering nuts and running through suburbs. |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftsandy said Jun 2, 2008, 11:08 PM: |
||
|
No -it's not that we are more advanced than animals -apart from the gift |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftkevin said Jun 3, 2008, 12:47 AM: |
||
|
It seems to me that there is a force behind all this that is up to something…a designing force…creating things like any designer. Start with an idea (a casette tape playing, personal music device for example) make it and call it a Walkman. Inevitably the designers see a way to make the first design better, so they get working on the next model. More features, smaller, faster. No sooner does the latest model go to production when new research leads to new ideas leads to yet another updated model. On and on it goes… |
|||
|
|
Re: the mind shiftsandra said Jun 5, 2008, 12:17 AM: |
||
|
i love how this thread is about a year old and the discussion is still so fresh |
|||

Help



