|
|
What is the Holodeck?~C4Chaos said Apr 24, 2006, 2:04 PM: |
||
|
The Holodeck is a holographic environment simulator. In the Star Trek universe, it's place section in starships and star bases where people hangout to learn, have fun, have sex, and what not. For us Singularitarians, the ZPod:Singulariy:The Holodeck is where we chill and talk about geeky stuff. Non-geeks are not welcome here! Just kidding. Everyone is invited, but prepare to be assimilated! Resistance is partial! |
|||
|
|
A step towards...Bill said Apr 24, 2006, 6:55 PM: |
||
|
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/04/24/tongue.sight.ap/index.html
|
|||
|
|
Re: A step towards...~C4Chaos said Apr 25, 2006, 12:30 AM: |
||
|
thanks for sharing this Bill. interesting stuff. reminded me of Kurzwiel's Human Body Version 2.0 essay. so i created a new thread in The Holodeck board so we can discuss this topic in detail. i suggest that you repost you stuff in this thread: Human Body 2.0
|
|||
|
|
Re: A step towards...Bill said Apr 25, 2006, 1:59 AM: |
||
|
Which model of the singularity do you tend towards? |
|||
|
|
Re: A step towards...~C4Chaos said Apr 25, 2006, 9:47 AM: |
||
|
i tend to gear towards Kurzweil's version of Technological Singularity since his version (as i perceive it) is the most inclusive, most researched, and his model was the one that got me thinking about this stuff anyway :) |
|||
|
|
Re: A step towards...Bill said Apr 25, 2006, 12:55 PM: |
||
|
Well, a few singularity models off the top of ny head might be: |
|||
|
|
Re: A step towards...~C4Chaos said Apr 26, 2006, 12:28 AM: |
||
|
well, most of the singularity models you mentioned above are covered under the umbrella of Kurzweil's singularity model. one look at KurzweilAi.net would prove this.
i don't read much Bucky Fuller, but i've heard of Bucky Balls :) although i agree that the singularity is hard to predict, but i'm on Kurzweil's side on this one, because even Kurzweil is honest enough to admit this. |
|||
|
|
Re: A step towards...Bill said Apr 26, 2006, 1:00 AM: |
||
|
Well, you can categorize them into basic groups, I guess. |
|||
|
|
Re: A step towards...~C4Chaos said Apr 26, 2006, 1:25 AM: |
||
|
“Fuller's idea of 'precession' is that technical advances create unintended side applications that are often larger than the original technical advance. As an example, we started developing transistors to improve radio, as a precession effect we lerned to make microprcessors, which you wouldn't likely have predicted from the first work on transistors.” |
|||
|
|
Re: A step towards...Bill said Apr 26, 2006, 12:52 PM: |
||
|
Ahhh, my apologies then, I didn't mean to intrude on your presentation. |
|||
|
|
Re: A step towards...Bill said Apr 26, 2006, 6:17 PM: |
||
|
you said “so there”. Doesn't that usually mean offense has been taken? I was just saying none was meant. I was only trying to place singularity talk in it's larger context. |
|||
|
|
Re: A step towards...~C4Chaos said Apr 27, 2006, 6:49 AM: |
||
|
“you said “so there”. Doesn't that usually mean offense has been taken? I was just saying none was meant. I was only trying to place singularity talk in it's larger context.” |
|||

Help


With his new book, The Singularity Is Near, Ray Kurzweil has taken all the strands of the singularity meme circulating in the last decades and has united them into a single tome which he has nailed on our front door. I suspect this will be one of the most cited books of the decade. Like Paul Ehrlich's upsetting 1972 book Population Bomb, fan or foe, it's the wave at the epicenter you have to 
