|
|
Re: What is the goal of Transformation?Ryan said Jun 9, 2006, 8:10 AM: |
||
|
Hey Donald, your question brings context to the discussion, and think I would define the question as what do we mean by transformation? I'm not going to claim any experiential authority to respond to your question, but I'll go ahead and give me egoic two cents;) First, in my study and practice of non-dual, nothing transforms and there is no one to transform. Second, the only thing that could transform is the ego, the relative stream of aggregates called “I”, the “individual”. What I agree on, is that spiritual realization can give us an important capitla P Perspective on all this transformation that is occurring in time. Rather, it gives us potential via a deeper understanding, but not direct transformation of anything other than spiritual “development” itself. But, I do think transformation happens all the same regardless of whether one has a non-dual experience or not, which I think is pretty easy to see in looking at ourselves and others around us. There's all different ways we transform - emotionally, physically, intellectually, etc. Sure, it still belongs to the ego, and it's nature is of the ego, regardless of non-dual, but the ego can expand it's relative perspective, which is also easy to see in developmental psychology. BUT, I agree that the deepest and most authentic transformation would be fostered within the non-dual realization. …but what does this egoic stream know?;) |
|||
|
|
Re: What is the goal of Transformation?Ryan said Jun 12, 2006, 7:43 AM: |
||
But if one is going to really work on it, I think one has to go for the whole tomaleI agree completely. As a matter of fact, almost all of my conscious efforts in transformation have occurred within or concurrently with spiritual transformation, so it's hard for me to comment on what it would be without. Your example of the difference in transformation before and after a non-dual experience makes a lot of sense and I wonder how this all fits into Wilber's notion that an individual's relative transformation is helped by non-dual spiritual practice, such as meditaton? Like you, I think he's right, but not a lot of research - at least that's readily accessible - has been done. hmm….. |
|||
|
|
Re: What is the goal of Transformation?Tom Sidebottom said Jun 12, 2006, 7:29 PM: |
||
|
I see it a bit differently. My old teacher's teacher, Franklin Merrell-Wolff, wrote about there being three different modes of consciousness: perception and cognition, which are both space-time based, and introception, which is his word for unitive consciousness. His writing, and my limited experience, is that unitive consciousness does not manifest in space-time categories. But unitive realization leaves traces behind that I apprehend through cognition or perception, and that I hold as an experience. These experiences can be powerful and cause profound changes in the structures of cognition and perception, but unitive consciousness is not that space-time experience. Where I certainly am is that sparks of unitive consciousness percolate through my normal waking awareness - if I'm lucky. My understanding of Buddha consciousness from the Tibetan Buddhist Middle Way schools is that fully realized Buddha consciousness continuously realizes both conventional space-time categories and unitive consciousness. For me, at least, that's the goal: walking simultaneously and continuously in two worlds. |
|||
|
|
Re: What is the goal of Transformation?please delete everything [no longer around] said Jun 13, 2006, 6:35 PM: |
||
|
http://www.newdimensions.org/listen-now/programofweek.html Listening to a good (free) audio on reason and consciousness and beliefs … sort of hits at this topic. Getting beyond beliefs… and how thinking is removed from reality. |
|||
|
|
Re: What is the goal of Transformation?Drake said Jun 14, 2006, 9:56 AM: |
||
|
I would disagree that a person can not transform themselves, transformation from one stage to another happens naturally and over time if the subject of the transformation is healthy, it is simply slow. Plunging into a non-dual state would not foster transformation in the whole organism anymore then any other state of consciousness can primarily because we will immediately, once out of the state articulate the experience in value statements that is in sympathy with our own stage. (Since we referred to Ken Wilber and to Spiral Dynamics before I will stick to that terminology.) So for example a Kabbalahlist and a Dzogchen Buddhist can both have a nondual state experience however, each will use the rhetoric of their own tradition to describe it. Further, having such an experience alone does not necessarily foster stage growth as you can still be a Green meme individual having nondual experiences. A recent article in What is Enlightenment? states that when Ken Wilber asked Genpo Roshi to judge for himself the level of stage growth most of his Japanese teachers where at, Genpo responded by saying “blue, all of them where blue.” Real stage growth has to be far more then the insights gleaned while in a nondual state, but also the acquisition of the values of higher memes. Thus for our Green meme Kabbalahist and Buddhist they must be endeavoring to embrace Yellow memes (or higher memes) while also engaging in there pursuits of altered states. Following Integral and Spiral Dynamics it is also important to consider that healthy Ego transcendence or identity is needed for evolution. The term Ego death stems from conventional and preconventional societies while Integral development requires the healthy identification with material. The Ego is an important aspect of healthy stage growth. Many very advanced mystics can cause serious Shadow issues by rejecting the ego as we can see by looking at the life of Chogyam Trungpa, and is attested to by Jack Kornfield in his own Vipassana experience which he related in After the Ecstasy the Laundry. None of this hits on the goal of transformation, which I fear is somewhat dependant upon your specific metaphysics and the area of transformation in question. Personal transformations are very individualistic to the tradition and the seeker a Kabbalahlist and a Buddhist have similar yet different metaphysics that fosters their desire for transformation, where as a social activist that seeking transformation in society is doing so based on the ethical implications of their own metaphysical paradigm. Personally I feel these are all human inventions to describe Eros as the mechanism that is built into God or created by God so as to allow It to better understand its' self. Namaste |
|||
|
|
Re: What is the goal of Transformation?Drake said Jun 15, 2006, 12:48 PM: |
||
|
The interpretation that no you or me or us exists because of the transitory identity of the ego is an extreme point of view not supported by most schools of nondualism, because of its inherent reductionism, this point of view is not nondualism as it was conceived, it is a misinterpretation of the concept of nondualism. In nondualism there exists no distinction between the ego and anything, just as there are no distinctions between is and is not, they are a singularity, like a mobius strip which is believed to be two sided but in fact is not. So according to nondualism there is a me there is just no distinction between what is not me or parts of me, as I am unified, indivisible as opposed to none existent, or no solution. Nondualism is not defined by absence, it is indefinable. Namaste |
|||
|
|
Re: What is the goal of Transformation?Drake said Jun 16, 2006, 5:20 AM: |
||
|
The goal I think is very hard to cognize. I can't help but feel much as you expressed that the words all sort fall short of the description. But I believe it is extremely important that when the individual has the nondual experience that there is a philosophical model for the waking mind to begin and articulate its experience as you did. Every time I have had a nondual experience, I can recall feeling as if there where no longer any unknown or unanswered questions, that unfortunately is lost after some time out of that state and all we are left with is the dim memory that we once felt in a way that we will describe based on our paradigms. The state in of its self with no paradigm to rationalize it often leaves people with unsorted memories that prevent transformation. The goal I believe will always allude us when we are out of the nondual state in much the same way that thinking about what happens after light speed often leaves us with more speculation then answers, because all that we experience is contained with the speed of light. The same with transformation it is a process of means to an ends that is in and of its self some what unperceivable. On a personal level I resonate with the idea that God is just getting to know itself and this entire process is the singularity of that ends. Namaste |
|||

Help


