Help
Sign In
RSS Feed
|
How science fits into my lifeMeenakshi said Aug 28, 1:23 PM: |
||
|
I'd love a discussion of how science fits into our life; and even of what it means to us. |
|||
Permalink
Print
Email
|
Science is everywhere!Dale Husband said Aug 28, 8:14 PM: |
||
|
Our entire civilization is built on advancements in science. As we gain an understanding of scientific laws via experimentation, we may them apply those laws over time. Applying them with human creativity produces technology. And as we make one technological advancement, it then opens up more possibilities for us. The laser, invented in 1960 (resulting from an understanding of how light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation work), is today used in so many ways that we now cannot imagine life without it. It is even used in scientific research, thus accelerating its progress.  |
|||
|
|
Re: How science fits into my lifeMeenakshi said Aug 28, 8:50 PM: |
||
|
Yes indeed; could you share in a more personal way how science came into your life, Dale? Once again, I've to go off [sleeping] but I”ll come back and share. |
|||
|
|
Re: How science fits into my lifeDale Husband said Aug 28, 9:54 PM: |
||
|
My interest in the general subject of science came first from reading science textbooks in grade school and then I started buying science books in stores. But my enthusiasm was really fired up by seeing Carl Sagan's COSMOS series. Sagan was my childhood idol and even after I became an adult and gained a more realistic view of him and all other scientists, he still remained the single biggest influence on my life. Science needs a new superhero  |
|||
|
|
Re: How science fits into my lifeMeenakshi said Aug 29, 9:57 AM: |
||
|
Ah that's wonderful! I'm a Sagan childhood fan too; and although the universe that he spoke of was far from the Science that we learned in school, I realize that he helped the boundaries of scientific study expand by his amazing videos. |
|||
|
|
Re: How science fits into my lifeDale Husband said Aug 29, 1:40 PM: |
||
|
Dale, tell me something. I actually thought that the cosmos and other universe videos are from actual images [silly me!] - are they actually artist renderings or computer generated as someone told me recently? |
|||
|
Re: How science fits into my lifebefore the star became a seed said Aug 29, 10:32 AM: |
||
|
okay, Dale, you have asked me about this current discussion. … But as it happens, I can only do as good as a 'response' right now, so excuse me for not being able to come up with any concrete example. |
|||
|
|
Re: How science fits into my lifeMeenakshi said Aug 30, 3:55 PM: |
||
|
Thanks Dale. There's a delicious quality to the thought that artists and scientists together make the Cosmos what it is!  |
|||
|
|
What has science done for you lately?Dale Husband said Aug 31, 4:19 PM: |
||
|
http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/whathassciencedone_01 Energy. Our understanding of this basic atomic structure has been used as the basis of nuclear power plants, which themselves have many societal benefits (e.g., nuclear power does not rely on non-renewable, polluting fossil fuels) and costs (e.g., nuclear power produces radioactive waste, which must be carefully stored for long periods of time). Medicine. That understanding has also been used in many modern medical applications (e.g., in radiation therapy for cancer and in medical imaging, which can trace the damage caused by a heart attack or Alzheimer's disease). Defense. During World War II, that knowledge also clued scientists and politicians in to the fact that atomic energy could be used to make weapons. Once a political decision was made to pursue atomic weapons, scientists worked to develop other scientific knowledge that would enable this technology to be built. So scientific knowledge allows new technologies to be built, and those technologies, in turn, impact society at many levels. For example, the advent of atomic weapons has influenced the way that World War II ended, its aftermath, and the power plays between nations right up until today. http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/whathassciencedone_03 Science and technology feed off of one another, propelling both forward. Scientific knowledge allows us to build new technologies, which often allow us to make new observations about the world, which, in turn, allow us to build even more scientific knowledge, which then inspires another technology … and so on. As an example, we'll start with a single scientific idea and trace its applications and impact through several different fields of science and technology, from the discovery of electrons in the 1800s to modern forensics and DNA fingerprinting … From cathodes to crystallography A cathode ray tube from the early 1900s We pick up our story in the late 1800s with a bit of technology that no one much understood at the time, but which was poised to change the face of science: the cathode ray tube (node A in the diagram below). This was a sealed glass tube emptied of almost all air — but when an electric current was passed through the tube, it no longer seemed empty. Rays of eerie light shot across the tube. In 1897, physicists would discover that these cathode rays were actually streams of electrons (B). The discovery of the electron would, in turn, lead to the discovery of the atomic nucleus in 1910 (C). On the technological front, the cathode ray tube would slowly evolve into the television (which is constructed from a cathode ray tube with the electron beam deflected in ways that produce an image on a screen) and, eventually, into many sorts of image monitors (D and E). But that's not all … In 1895, the German physicist Wilhem Roentgen noticed that his cathode ray tube seemed to be producing some other sort of ray in addition to the lights inside the tube. These new rays were invisible but caused a screen in his laboratory to light up. He tried to block the rays, but they passed right through paper, copper, and aluminum, but not lead. And not bone. Roentgen noticed that the rays revealed the faint shadow of the bones in his hand! Roentgen had discovered X-rays, a form of electromagnetic radiation (F). This discovery would, of course, shortly lead to the invention of the X-ray machine (G), which would in turn, evolve into the CT scan machine (H) — both of which would become essential to non-invasive medical diagnoses. And the CT scanner itself would soon be adopted by other branches of science — for neurological research, archaeology, and paleontology, in which CT scans are used to study the interiors of fossils (I). Additionally, the discovery of X-rays would eventually lead to the development of X-ray telescopes to detect radiation emitted by objects in deep space (J). And these telescopes would, in turn, shed light on black holes, supernovas, and the origins of the universe (K). But that's not all … The discovery of X-rays also pointed William and William Bragg (a father-son team) in 1913 and 1914 to the idea that X-rays could be used to figure out the arrangements of atoms in a crystal (L). This works a bit like trying to figure out the size and shape of a building based on the shadow it casts: you can work backwards from the shape of the shadow to make a guess at the building's dimensions. When X-rays are passed through a crystal, some of the X-rays are bent or spread out (i.e., diffracted) by the atoms in the crystal. You can then extrapolate backwards from the locations of the deflected X-rays to figure out the relative locations of the crystal atoms. This technique is known as X-ray crystallography, and it has profoundly influenced the course of science by providing snapshots of molecular structures. Perhaps most notably, Rosalind Franklin used X-ray crystallography to help uncover the structure of the key molecule of life: DNA. In 1952, Franklin, like James Watson and Francis Crick, was working on the structure of DNA — but from a different angle. Franklin was painstakingly producing diffracted images of DNA, while Watson and Crick were trying out different structures using tinker-toy models of the component molecules. In fact, Franklin had already proposed a double helical form for the molecule when, in 1953, a colleague showed Franklin's most telling image to Watson. That picture convinced Watson and Crick that the molecule was a double helix and pointed to the arrangement of atoms within that helix. Over the next few weeks, the famous pair would use their models to correctly work out the chemical details of DNA (M). The impact of the discovery of DNA's structure on scientific research, medicine, agriculture, conservation, and other social issues has been wide-ranging — so much so, that it is difficult to pick out which threads of influence to follow. To choose just one, understanding the structure of DNA (along with many other inputs) eventually allowed biologists to develop a quick and easy method for copying very small amounts of DNA, known as PCR — the polymerase chain reaction (N). This technique (developed in the 1980s), in turn, allowed the development of DNA fingerprinting technologies, which have become an important part of modern criminal investigations (O). As shown by the flowchart above, scientific knowledge (like the discovery of X-rays) and technologies (like the invention of PCR) are deeply interwoven and feed off one another. In this case, tracing the influence of a single technology, the cathode ray tube, over the course of a century has taken us on a journey spanning ancient fossils, supernovas, the invention of television, the atomic nucleus, and DNA fingerprinting. And even this complex network is incomplete. Understanding DNA's structure, for example, led to many more advances besides just the development of PCR. And similarly, the invention of the CT scanner relied on much more scientific knowledge than just an understanding of how X-ray machines work. Scientific knowledge and technology form a maze of connections in which every idea is connected to every other idea through a winding path.  |
|||
